rec.autos.simulators

GPL: TSW+PDPI not smooth???

Darko Juva

GPL: TSW+PDPI not smooth???

by Darko Juva » Fri, 11 Feb 2000 04:00:00

Hi all,

Recently, I installed PDPI L4. I have TSW (50 ohm SPEC pots). No jittering,
spiking - it's rock solid, BUT it's not as smooth as TSW+SB Live. My virtual
wheel in GPL moves in discrete increments, not smoothly, very hard to
control when you have setting to full linear. Specially hard to control
close to wheel neutral position. By the way, I calibrated TSW without
problem and also I set dead zone to 0 using CTFJ!. Didn't help. It's hard
for me to believe that TSW+PDPI cannot better TSW+SB Live in smoothness. So
my questions are.

1. Is that matter of fine tuning in PDPI Default/FineTuneInfo  registry
settings. Currently I have
"FineTuneInfo"=hex:3b,00,00,00,3b,00,00,00,3b,00,00,00,3b,00,00,00
(exported from my registry). Can anybody who have smooth respond with
TSW(SPEC pots) and PDPI send me a FineTuneInfo settings?

2. Is there anything else I can do to solve my problem. Like special
registry settings, magic calibration...

Otherwise I'll be forced to go back to SB Live gameport which gives me
little jittering but allow me smooth control with generic Papy driver and
steering set to full linear.

 I really hope that I'm doing something wrong and PDPI is rock solid and
smooth, as so many people in this news group said it is.

I'll highly appreciate any help or suggestion? Thank you in advance.

Darko

bph..

GPL: TSW+PDPI not smooth???

by bph.. » Fri, 11 Feb 2000 04:00:00

I have a tsw2 with spec steering pot and pdpi.  Steering moves smoothly
in gpl, NO increments.  I have the switch on the pdpi set to digital.
I have done no special calib or tweaking.  My default fine tune reg
entries are the same as yours.  I also have a sb live.  I'm using dx
6.1.  Maybe Thomas or pdpi can help you.



> Hi all,

> Recently, I installed PDPI L4. I have TSW (50 ohm SPEC pots). No
jittering,
> spiking - it's rock solid, BUT it's not as smooth as TSW+SB Live. My
virtual
> wheel in GPL moves in discrete increments, not smoothly, very hard to
> control when you have setting to full linear. Specially hard to
control
> close to wheel neutral position. By the way, I calibrated TSW without
> problem and also I set dead zone to 0 using CTFJ!. Didn't help. It's
hard
> for me to believe that TSW+PDPI cannot better TSW+SB Live in
smoothness. So
> my questions are.

> 1. Is that matter of fine tuning in PDPI Default/FineTuneInfo
registry
> settings. Currently I have
> "FineTuneInfo"=hex:3b,00,00,00,3b,00,00,00,3b,00,00,00,3b,00,00,00
> (exported from my registry). Can anybody who have smooth respond with
> TSW(SPEC pots) and PDPI send me a FineTuneInfo settings?

> 2. Is there anything else I can do to solve my problem. Like special
> registry settings, magic calibration...

> Otherwise I'll be forced to go back to SB Live gameport which gives me
> little jittering but allow me smooth control with generic Papy driver
and
> steering set to full linear.

>  I really hope that I'm doing something wrong and PDPI is rock solid
and
> smooth, as so many people in this news group said it is.

> I'll highly appreciate any help or suggestion? Thank you in advance.

> Darko


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
asgeir nes?e

GPL: TSW+PDPI not smooth???

by asgeir nes?e » Fri, 11 Feb 2000 04:00:00

I am using 20K pots, and I definitely had to adjust the register of the PDPI
FineTune section.

First of all, make an folder in the FineTuneInfo section bearing the same name
as your controller. Then make the keys in that folder required (have a look at
the keys in any other folder in the FineTuneInfo folder, copy name and content).
You now have a register setting that you can experiment with

Darko, 3B in the fine tune register is way too little sensitivity for 50 k.

I am using 10 for my 20k pots! So, 20 could be a good value for 50k pots.

If you are using 50k pots all around you should use these values:
"FineTuneInfo"=hex:20,00,00,00,20,00,00,00,20,00,00,00,20,00,00,00". You're only
using 3 axes, so the last of the four "20" isn't important...

You should obtain a range of 0 to 255 if you can. You just have to adjust the
finetune register so that you get as big range as possible.

One thing... You have to restart your computer every time you change the
values... :-( Windows reads the register only when you start up windows.

If you don't get it to work, you can email me, because I have a lot of
experience in this. :-)

---Asgeir---

Shum

GPL: TSW+PDPI not smooth???

by Shum » Fri, 11 Feb 2000 04:00:00

Thanks Asgeir,

He sent me an e-mail, and I was just about to recommend the exact same thing
:)

It's also worth noting that the TSWs set their pedal pots at "mid-range" of
the resistance position (position-range of the axis by default never reaches
0 resistance value). It is always wise to manually adjust the pot posts to
start from 0 resistance (all the way to lock on the one side - depending on
the position of the pot mounting) to reach a desired result. In fact...
EVERYONE should make sure this is the case on all their pedal units (you'd
be surprised what some of the settings are on some wheels).

Cheers,

Shumi

P.S. Darko... the settings that Asgeir recommended should increase
performance for you :) We would add it automatically in the drivers except
that it would probably cause confusion for most since most use 100-250K
Pots, and the 20 setting will not be desirable for them...


Darko Juva

GPL: TSW+PDPI not smooth???

by Darko Juva » Fri, 11 Feb 2000 04:00:00

Thanks guys. I just change from 0x3b->0x20 in FineTuneInfo, and that made
HUGE difference. It's just the best experience in GPL I ever have. Rock
solid and smooth. This little tweak made wonder. Shumi you should put this
info on PDPI site/documentation, or at least in Readme file. Now TSW+PDPI
really look like ultimate combination for GPL, but just with a right
FineTuneInfo settings. Once again, thank you very much for your response.

Darko


> Thanks Asgeir,

> He sent me an e-mail, and I was just about to recommend the exact same
thing
> :)

> It's also worth noting that the TSWs set their pedal pots at "mid-range"
of
> the resistance position (position-range of the axis by default never
reaches
> 0 resistance value). It is always wise to manually adjust the pot posts to
> start from 0 resistance (all the way to lock on the one side - depending
on
> the position of the pot mounting) to reach a desired result. In fact...
> EVERYONE should make sure this is the case on all their pedal units (you'd
> be surprised what some of the settings are on some wheels).

> Cheers,

> Shumi

> P.S. Darko... the settings that Asgeir recommended should increase
> performance for you :) We would add it automatically in the drivers except
> that it would probably cause confusion for most since most use 100-250K
> Pots, and the 20 setting will not be desirable for them...



> > I am using 20K pots, and I definitely had to adjust the register of the
> PDPI
> > FineTune section.

> > First of all, make an folder in the FineTuneInfo section bearing the
same
> name
> > as your controller. Then make the keys in that folder required (have a
> look at
> > the keys in any other folder in the FineTuneInfo folder, copy name and
> content).
> > You now have a register setting that you can experiment with

> > Darko, 3B in the fine tune register is way too little sensitivity for 50
> k.

> > I am using 10 for my 20k pots! So, 20 could be a good value for 50k
pots.

> > If you are using 50k pots all around you should use these values:
> > "FineTuneInfo"=hex:20,00,00,00,20,00,00,00,20,00,00,00,20,00,00,00".
> You're only
> > using 3 axes, so the last of the four "20" isn't important...

> > You should obtain a range of 0 to 255 if you can. You just have to
adjust
> the
> > finetune register so that you get as big range as possible.

> > One thing... You have to restart your computer every time you change the
> > values... :-( Windows reads the register only when you start up windows.

> > If you don't get it to work, you can email me, because I have a lot of
> > experience in this. :-)

> > ---Asgeir---

Shum

GPL: TSW+PDPI not smooth???

by Shum » Sat, 12 Feb 2000 04:00:00

I have made note of the settings you gentlemen are experiencing favorable
results with, and the new version of the drivers will include a readme.txt
for uncommon pots (although they should be more commonly used). Keep your
eyes peeled for our Win2K drivers coming soon :)

20K = 10
50K = 18

Cheers,

Shumi


> Thanks guys. I just change from 0x3b->0x20 in FineTuneInfo, and that made
> HUGE difference. It's just the best experience in GPL I ever have. Rock
> solid and smooth. This little tweak made wonder. Shumi you should put this
> info on PDPI site/documentation, or at least in Readme file. Now TSW+PDPI
> really look like ultimate combination for GPL, but just with a right
> FineTuneInfo settings. Once again, thank you very much for your response.

> Darko



> > Thanks Asgeir,

> > He sent me an e-mail, and I was just about to recommend the exact same
> thing
> > :)

> > It's also worth noting that the TSWs set their pedal pots at "mid-range"
> of
> > the resistance position (position-range of the axis by default never
> reaches
> > 0 resistance value). It is always wise to manually adjust the pot posts
to
> > start from 0 resistance (all the way to lock on the one side - depending
> on
> > the position of the pot mounting) to reach a desired result. In fact...
> > EVERYONE should make sure this is the case on all their pedal units
(you'd
> > be surprised what some of the settings are on some wheels).

> > Cheers,

> > Shumi

> > P.S. Darko... the settings that Asgeir recommended should increase
> > performance for you :) We would add it automatically in the drivers
except
> > that it would probably cause confusion for most since most use 100-250K
> > Pots, and the 20 setting will not be desirable for them...



> > > I am using 20K pots, and I definitely had to adjust the register of
the
> > PDPI
> > > FineTune section.

> > > First of all, make an folder in the FineTuneInfo section bearing the
> same
> > name
> > > as your controller. Then make the keys in that folder required (have a
> > look at
> > > the keys in any other folder in the FineTuneInfo folder, copy name and
> > content).
> > > You now have a register setting that you can experiment with

> > > Darko, 3B in the fine tune register is way too little sensitivity for
50
> > k.

> > > I am using 10 for my 20k pots! So, 20 could be a good value for 50k
> pots.

> > > If you are using 50k pots all around you should use these values:
> > > "FineTuneInfo"=hex:20,00,00,00,20,00,00,00,20,00,00,00,20,00,00,00".
> > You're only
> > > using 3 axes, so the last of the four "20" isn't important...

> > > You should obtain a range of 0 to 255 if you can. You just have to
> adjust
> > the
> > > finetune register so that you get as big range as possible.

> > > One thing... You have to restart your computer every time you change
the
> > > values... :-( Windows reads the register only when you start up
windows.

> > > If you don't get it to work, you can email me, because I have a lot of
> > > experience in this. :-)

> > > ---Asgeir---

Kenny L

GPL: TSW+PDPI not smooth???

by Kenny L » Sat, 12 Feb 2000 04:00:00

I've owned a PDPI  L4 for a while, and have never seen this FineTuneInfo
deal you're
speaking of.  Where is that?  What did I miss?

--
Kenny L.
kenny_l  AT pacbell DOT net


> I have made note of the settings you gentlemen are experiencing favorable
> results with, and the new version of the drivers will include a readme.txt
> for uncommon pots (although they should be more commonly used). Keep your
> eyes peeled for our Win2K drivers coming soon :)

> 20K = 10
> 50K = 18

> Cheers,

> Shumi



> > Thanks guys. I just change from 0x3b->0x20 in FineTuneInfo, and that
made
> > HUGE difference. It's just the best experience in GPL I ever have. Rock
> > solid and smooth. This little tweak made wonder. Shumi you should put
this
> > info on PDPI site/documentation, or at least in Readme file. Now
TSW+PDPI
> > really look like ultimate combination for GPL, but just with a right
> > FineTuneInfo settings. Once again, thank you very much for your
response.

> > Darko



> > > Thanks Asgeir,

> > > He sent me an e-mail, and I was just about to recommend the exact same
> > thing
> > > :)

> > > It's also worth noting that the TSWs set their pedal pots at
"mid-range"
> > of
> > > the resistance position (position-range of the axis by default never
> > reaches
> > > 0 resistance value). It is always wise to manually adjust the pot
posts
> to
> > > start from 0 resistance (all the way to lock on the one side -
depending
> > on
> > > the position of the pot mounting) to reach a desired result. In
fact...
> > > EVERYONE should make sure this is the case on all their pedal units
> (you'd
> > > be surprised what some of the settings are on some wheels).

> > > Cheers,

> > > Shumi

> > > P.S. Darko... the settings that Asgeir recommended should increase
> > > performance for you :) We would add it automatically in the drivers
> except
> > > that it would probably cause confusion for most since most use
100-250K
> > > Pots, and the 20 setting will not be desirable for them...



> > > > I am using 20K pots, and I definitely had to adjust the register of
> the
> > > PDPI
> > > > FineTune section.

> > > > First of all, make an folder in the FineTuneInfo section bearing the
> > same
> > > name
> > > > as your controller. Then make the keys in that folder required (have
a
> > > look at
> > > > the keys in any other folder in the FineTuneInfo folder, copy name
and
> > > content).
> > > > You now have a register setting that you can experiment with

> > > > Darko, 3B in the fine tune register is way too little sensitivity
for
> 50
> > > k.

> > > > I am using 10 for my 20k pots! So, 20 could be a good value for 50k
> > pots.

> > > > If you are using 50k pots all around you should use these values:
> > > > "FineTuneInfo"=hex:20,00,00,00,20,00,00,00,20,00,00,00,20,00,00,00".
> > > You're only
> > > > using 3 axes, so the last of the four "20" isn't important...

> > > > You should obtain a range of 0 to 255 if you can. You just have to
> > adjust
> > > the
> > > > finetune register so that you get as big range as possible.

> > > > One thing... You have to restart your computer every time you change
> the
> > > > values... :-( Windows reads the register only when you start up
> windows.

> > > > If you don't get it to work, you can email me, because I have a lot
of
> > > > experience in this. :-)

> > > > ---Asgeir---

Kenny L

GPL: TSW+PDPI not smooth???

by Kenny L » Sat, 12 Feb 2000 04:00:00

Ok, I found that reg entry.  Now, a new question.  Is there a setting which
would make
a Thrustmaster NASCAR pro wheel smoother?  I have not been able to use the
Papy
joystick driver since I installed the PDPI L4, my inputs are way too clunky.
The Dx driver
does seem to work well enough, though.  But, I do remember the Papy driver
beeing
much more precise.
TIA
--
Kenny L.
kenny_l  AT pacbell DOT net


> Hi all,

> Recently, I installed PDPI L4. I have TSW (50 ohm SPEC pots). No
jittering,
> spiking - it's rock solid, BUT it's not as smooth as TSW+SB Live. My
virtual
> wheel in GPL moves in discrete increments, not smoothly, very hard to
> control when you have setting to full linear. Specially hard to control
> close to wheel neutral position. By the way, I calibrated TSW without
> problem and also I set dead zone to 0 using CTFJ!. Didn't help. It's hard
> for me to believe that TSW+PDPI cannot better TSW+SB Live in smoothness.
So
> my questions are.

> 1. Is that matter of fine tuning in PDPI Default/FineTuneInfo  registry
> settings. Currently I have
> "FineTuneInfo"=hex:3b,00,00,00,3b,00,00,00,3b,00,00,00,3b,00,00,00
> (exported from my registry). Can anybody who have smooth respond with
> TSW(SPEC pots) and PDPI send me a FineTuneInfo settings?

> 2. Is there anything else I can do to solve my problem. Like special
> registry settings, magic calibration...

> Otherwise I'll be forced to go back to SB Live gameport which gives me
> little jittering but allow me smooth control with generic Papy driver and
> steering set to full linear.

>  I really hope that I'm doing something wrong and PDPI is rock solid and
> smooth, as so many people in this news group said it is.

> I'll highly appreciate any help or suggestion? Thank you in advance.

> Darko


asgeir nes?e

GPL: TSW+PDPI not smooth???

by asgeir nes?e » Sat, 12 Feb 2000 04:00:00

You need to use the DirectInput... Because The PDIP doesn't do anything to the
signals if you use Generic... And you don't benefit from the diminished load on
the CPU either...

The DirectInput (using the PDPI joystick driver) reports a number from 0 to 255
(8 bit resolution), and although displaying a lower number, it is as stable and
accurate as can be... 255 possible wheel positions are more than you'll ever
need...

---Asgeir---


> Ok, I found that reg entry.  Now, a new question.  Is there a setting which
> would make
> a Thrustmaster NASCAR pro wheel smoother?  I have not been able to use the
> Papy
> joystick driver since I installed the PDPI L4, my inputs are way too clunky.
> The Dx driver
> does seem to work well enough, though.  But, I do remember the Papy driver
> beeing
> much more precise.
> TIA
> --
> Kenny L.
> kenny_l  AT pacbell DOT net

asgeir nes?e

GPL: TSW+PDPI not smooth???

by asgeir nes?e » Sat, 12 Feb 2000 04:00:00

If your rig works ok, and the ranges count around 200, you don't have to worry
about anything. It is when you don't get a large range with your pots that you
need to tamper with the register.

---Asgeir---


> I've owned a PDPI  L4 for a while, and have never seen this FineTuneInfo
> deal you're
> speaking of.  Where is that?  What did I miss?

> --
> Kenny L.
> kenny_l  AT pacbell DOT net

asgeir nes?e

GPL: TSW+PDPI not smooth???

by asgeir nes?e » Sat, 12 Feb 2000 04:00:00

Yes, this is very important simply because we would like to have as large as
possible range of the input. If your pot gives 0 ohm at zero movement, you can
tune the register so that you'll get 255 different values.

The PDPI is a joy to set up with a nonstandard racing rig (like my own)... :-)

With PDPI and three supreme quality pots (you know, those capable of 10 mill
revs), you never need to worry about calibrating again... :-)))

---Asgeir---


> Thanks Asgeir,

> He sent me an e-mail, and I was just about to recommend the exact same thing
> :)

> It's also worth noting that the TSWs set their pedal pots at "mid-range" of
> the resistance position (position-range of the axis by default never reaches
> 0 resistance value). It is always wise to manually adjust the pot posts to
> start from 0 resistance (all the way to lock on the one side - depending on
> the position of the pot mounting) to reach a desired result. In fact...
> EVERYONE should make sure this is the case on all their pedal units (you'd
> be surprised what some of the settings are on some wheels).

> Cheers,

> Shumi

> P.S. Darko... the settings that Asgeir recommended should increase
> performance for you :) We would add it automatically in the drivers except
> that it would probably cause confusion for most since most use 100-250K
> Pots, and the 20 setting will not be desirable for them...

Darko Juva

GPL: TSW+PDPI not smooth???

by Darko Juva » Sat, 12 Feb 2000 04:00:00

What do you mean with "ranges count around 200"? Give example settings for
50 ohm and 100 ohm pots to be in range of 200. I found that 18 (hex) is
smooth for 50 ohm pots. Is that in the range?

Darko


> If your rig works ok, and the ranges count around 200, you don't have to
worry
> about anything. It is when you don't get a large range with your pots that
you
> need to tamper with the register.

> ---Asgeir---


> > I've owned a PDPI  L4 for a while, and have never seen this FineTuneInfo
> > deal you're
> > speaking of.  Where is that?  What did I miss?

> > --
> > Kenny L.
> > kenny_l  AT pacbell DOT net

Asgeir Nesoe

GPL: TSW+PDPI not smooth???

by Asgeir Nesoe » Tue, 15 Feb 2000 04:00:00

I am talking about the range you get when you calibrate the thing in GPL... The
range is the biggest value subtracted by the smallest value.

That is why getting the smallest value at the "unactivated" position is
important: You can tune the register so that you get as close as you want to the
255 different values...

I think that for the pedals you need at least a range of 80-100. I have made my
own pedals, and the brake pedal has very little movement, and a subtle change of
pressure at the near bottom position should cause an accurate change of input
value. So, I have tuned the register so that I get a big range (200) to ensure
accuracy for even the smallest changes, especially at around the threshold pedal
pressure (Hehe, my brake pedal needs a heavier foot than my real life car!)...

The throttle needs less range, I'd say that you can't feel any difference
between a range of 50 and 100...

The steering needs as much accuracy as you can get, I would say that it should
use 200 - 250 or so to get as accurate steering as possible.

---Asgeir---


> What do you mean with "ranges count around 200"? Give example settings for
> 50 ohm and 100 ohm pots to be in range of 200. I found that 18 (hex) is
> smooth for 50 ohm pots. Is that in the range?

> Darko



> > If your rig works ok, and the ranges count around 200, you don't have to
> worry
> > about anything. It is when you don't get a large range with your pots that
> you
> > need to tamper with the register.

> > ---Asgeir---


> > > I've owned a PDPI  L4 for a while, and have never seen this FineTuneInfo
> > > deal you're
> > > speaking of.  Where is that?  What did I miss?

> > > --
> > > Kenny L.
> > > kenny_l  AT pacbell DOT net


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.