FWIW, I think all of the "updates" you mentioned were all well worth
the money. But I'm with RedTed, the gp3 2000 update is more of a patch
to a buggy release than a new release.
GP4 is what we should all be paying our money for when released -
apparently ;-)
Rafe Mc
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001 23:17:10 +0100, "Iain Mackenzie"
>Actually, I think you'll find that I didn't ever use the term 'add-ons', I
>used your term 'update' - subtle difference.
>I think you'll find that most of the sims we all use and talk about have
>contained various bugs and usually several patched are released to address
>these problems.
>So you didn't buy F1CS, well, that was a mistake as it was a big leap
>forward from F12K. I deduce then that you bought everything else on the
>list. in that case then clearly you do buy 'updates'.
>Iain
>> > "Iain Mackenzie" wrote
>> > > So you don't buy 'updates' - even if they are amazingly good? A
>strange
>> > > attitude. I presume then you didn't buy ICR2, N2, N3, N4, GP2, GP3,
>GP3
>> > > 2000, F1CS, MGPRS2.......... and many other 'updates'. I presume you
>> also
>> > > will not be buying F1 2001, F1RC2, GP4, and all the other up and
>coming
>> > > 'updates'!
>> > > Iain
>> Nascar2, 3 and 4 were add-ons ? I never knew that. Cheers.
>> I won't be buying F1RC2. Correct.
>> I didn't buy F1CS.
>> If you want to encourage developers and publishers to release bug ridden
>> games, you're going about it the right way.
>> Sequels and add-ons are a little different, don't you think ?