Thanks for the info. Actually the sound chip is outstanding. It uses about
1% cpu cycles cpmpared to the 23% of the soundblaster live. Comparable to
the Audigy.
Sondog
> >I am thinking about a G4 ti 4600 or G3 ti 200. My current specs are as
> >follows:
> >MSI K7N420 motherboard (onboard 5:1 sound/gf2mx)
> >256 ddr
> >AMD XP 1500
> >windows XP
> >I run N2002 with 43 cars, no aa, world detail 50%, high detail cars,
opengl,
> >1024x768, 16 bit color. At the start of the race I get 35 fps and during
> >the race it can get as high as 50 fps. I would like to run with some aa
or
> >the quincunx or whatever they call it. So With aa on and world detail
set
> >to high what kind of fps should I expect?
> >I would like the game to look a little cleaner, but If the performance
> >increase is not there I won't make the purchase. Thanks in advance.
> >Sondog
> Either card would be pretty well suited to your system, it simply
> depends on whether you want to spend a fortune for some extra
> horsepower from the GF4 or not. I have a GF3 ti 200 and it overclocks
> like a beauty, actually faster than a ti500. So I would personally
> save some cash and go for the GF3 ti 200.
> Oh, and either card will absolutely wipe the floor with your old GF2MX
> :) You may also want to consider getting a decent soundcard.
> Rafe Mc
