rec.autos.simulators

Why Isn't N4 the "BEST" Sim Ever?

ymenar

Why Isn't N4 the "BEST" Sim Ever?

by ymenar » Sat, 16 Jun 2001 08:16:21


> ALL N4 BASE ARE BELONG TO GPL

What you say ! !

--
-- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
-- http://www.racesimcentral.net/
-- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimato Dominguez
Corporation - helping America into the New World...

Morgan V. Woote

Why Isn't N4 the "BEST" Sim Ever?

by Morgan V. Woote » Sat, 16 Jun 2001 08:22:30

Because it's boring? :)

Man, I love stock car racing, but there's just something about N4 that bores me
to death. Maybe it's the poor sense of speed or maybe it's all the boring
cookie-cutter tracks, but whatever it is it's just boring.

--
-------------------------------------
Morgan Vincent Wooten
http://home.earthlink.net/~morganv00/
GPLRank: +7.63
-------------------------------------



Jesse Blac

Why Isn't N4 the "BEST" Sim Ever?

by Jesse Blac » Sat, 16 Jun 2001 08:35:17

Viper racing has great physics...right up there with GPL/N4...but look at
the tracks...all unrealistic fantasy tracks...it is not just physics that
make a game good, but also tracks...and for ME, Nascar only has 2 usable
tracks...and the online competition at these 2 tracks isn't really that
good...so I stick with GPL because it has a wider assortment of usable
tracks (for ME) and a lot of people racing at these tracks online.

This is just for me...now for all the oval racers out there, I am sure N4 is
the best sim for them.

JB


>It uses the GPL physics. Better graphics. Better multiplayer. More
features.

>It comes straight from GPL's womb.

>Why do some of you continue to say that GPL is the best sim ever?

>David G Fisher

Don Burnett

Why Isn't N4 the "BEST" Sim Ever?

by Don Burnett » Sat, 16 Jun 2001 09:28:39

I suspect sim racers that prefer Nascar type racing would undoubtedly tell
you N4 is the best sim ever, and vice-versa. Two completely different types
of racing.
I have both on my hard drive, but N4 sees 50 times more action on my pc than
GPL does.

Don Burnette



(Rich#8

Why Isn't N4 the "BEST" Sim Ever?

by (Rich#8 » Sat, 16 Jun 2001 09:36:32

I agree with you on that, Viper Racing  is tip top in the physics
department, but the tracks are just corny. If Viper had realistic
tracks,  ie; Watkins Glen, Laguna Seca, Brands Hatch, etc. It would be
alot stronger today in the sim community.



>Viper racing has great physics...right up there with GPL/N4...but look at
>the tracks...all unrealistic fantasy tracks...it is not just physics that
>make a game good, but also tracks...and for ME, Nascar only has 2 usable
>tracks...and the online competition at these 2 tracks isn't really that
>good...so I stick with GPL because it has a wider assortment of usable
>tracks (for ME) and a lot of people racing at these tracks online.

>This is just for me...now for all the oval racers out there, I am sure N4 is
>the best sim for them.

>JB


>>It uses the GPL physics. Better graphics. Better multiplayer. More
>features.

>>It comes straight from GPL's womb.

>>Why do some of you continue to say that GPL is the best sim ever?

>>David G Fisher

Don Burnett

Why Isn't N4 the "BEST" Sim Ever?

by Don Burnett » Sat, 16 Jun 2001 09:38:26

Well I tell ya what,
I was in a league race last night at Daytona - 80 laps. We all ran nose to
tail and side by side throughout the race. Our first caution came out around
lap 36. We ended the race with app 4 cautions overall. 16 lead changes
amongst 9 different drivers.
That was some of the most intense racing I have been involved in , and
realistic. I stayed up to the wee ours of the morning last night just
watching some of the replay.  It was like I was watching a race on the tv.
For most all of those 80 laps I was clutching the wheel firmly, eyes glued
to the screen, and loving every minute of it. That's what Nascar is all
about. We never got really spread out. You didn;t have time to relax your
grip on the wheel with the exception of the caution flags. Pit road was a
flurry of activity during the cautions.
For me, it just don't get any better than that. The quality of the
connections were awesome as well.
But Nascar type racing is what trips my trigger. I love GPL, but it just
doesn't give me the same thrill.
And imho, the multiplayer environment we have with N4 is pretty doggone
good, and I expect it will only continue to get better.

Don Burnette



> > Better multiplayer.

> Really?  I don't find the N4 multiplayer good at all.  Mostly because of
the
> abuse by the drivers with the weakness of the multiplayer client/server
> options.  That might change with the upcoming patch.  Yes, they are
creating
> *another* patch for N4 that will add even more options and make it even
> better.  Amazing eh compared to <cough> another company?

> > Why do some of you continue to say that GPL is the best sim ever?

> N4 is the best racing sim ever, but GPL is the best driving sim ever for
me.
> Well, until I can race my GPL tracks with N4.

> --
> -- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
> -- May the Downforce be with you...
> -- http://www.ymenard.com/
> -- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimato Dominguez
> Corporation - helping America into the New World...

Eldre

Why Isn't N4 the "BEST" Sim Ever?

by Eldre » Sat, 16 Jun 2001 10:10:43



>It uses the GPL physics. Better graphics. Better multiplayer. More features.

>It comes straight from GPL's womb.

>Why do some of you continue to say that GPL is the best sim ever?

"Best" is relative, unless you are basing on a certain measurable quality.  The
way you're asking the question, you're wondering why people *prefer* GPL.  It's
an opinion, not wrong or right.  Some people prefer Viper, or F12CS, or some
other sim.  It's like asking "What's the best rock band?"  My answer to that
question might be totally different from yours.
If you say "best" in terms of sales(N4), number of opponents(N4), number of
marques(GPL), number of tracks available(GPL), or even size of the installed
program(?) - that's something objective you can measure and agree on.  Even
saying "better graphics" is useless to someone who has to turn the eye candy
down to get good frame rates. When you ask a subjective question, opinions will
probably vary.  That shouldn't surprise anybody, not even you...

Eldred
--
Dale Earnhardt, Sr. R.I.P. 1951-2001
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
F1 hcp. +20.90...F2 +151.26...

Never argue with an idiot.  He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

Peter C. Oxfor

Why Isn't N4 the "BEST" Sim Ever?

by Peter C. Oxfor » Sat, 16 Jun 2001 10:20:06

As I posted in another thread, NASCAR type racing requires competition,
preferably human competition, to be successful. Hotlapping solo at Monaco or
Monza may diverting with GPL or GP3, but how many orbits around Talledaga or
Texas can you make without little white pills to keep your eyes open? It's
b-o-r-ing. The heart of stock car racing is the mano-a-mano aspect. I think
each attracts different types of gamers.

Therefore the NASCAR-type game is going to rise or fall, ultimately, on the
strength of its online capability. I think Papyrus has nailed this with N4.
Whatever you say about the wreckers and the clearasil cowboys, it works on
Sierra. With a good connection and a muscular PC, N4 rocks big time online.
The most riveting experience yet. And don't hold your breath waiting to play
a modern, papy-designed open***pit sim over the net, the F1 people and
Bernie Ecclestone won't be authorizing that.

I do have, howver, a few gripes with N4 which may limit it's longevity on
the hard drive.
1- No pitstops, at least no scheduled pitstops. Papyrus didn't see fit to
include an accelerated wear feature in N4, which amputates much of the
strategy element .I think you need the equivalent of an 80% race without
this option in order to force true strategic thinking on the racers. Right
now we're running sprints, not NASCAR races. This might get old.
2-'Medium' damage should be what Papy now labels  'Realistic' damage. We
don't currently have 'Realistic' damage.
3- No telemetry.
4- Oh yeah, the AI, for those who care about that.


> I suspect sim racers that prefer Nascar type racing would undoubtedly tell
> you N4 is the best sim ever, and vice-versa. Two completely different
types
> of racing.
> I have both on my hard drive, but N4 sees 50 times more action on my pc
than
> GPL does.

> Don Burnette



> > It uses the GPL physics. Better graphics. Better multiplayer. More
> features.

> > It comes straight from GPL's womb.

> > Why do some of you continue to say that GPL is the best sim ever?

> > David G Fisher

ymenar

Why Isn't N4 the "BEST" Sim Ever?

by ymenar » Sat, 16 Jun 2001 13:13:48


> I was in a league race last night at Daytona - 80 laps. We all ran nose to
> tail and side by side throughout the race. Our first caution came out
around
> lap 36. We ended the race with app 4 cautions overall. 16 lead changes
> amongst 9 different drivers.

Yeah and I know some leagues who have 27 cautions at the same track in a 50%
Talladega.  And I'm not talking about bad drivers, au contraire.  Of course
1 race out of 10 will be a great experience!  What about the nine others???

Yes, but the drivers are abusing the systems.  I'm talking about pickups.

--
-- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
-- May the Downforce be with you...
-- http://www.ymenard.com/
-- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimato Dominguez
Corporation - helping America into the New World...

Thom j

Why Isn't N4 the "BEST" Sim Ever?

by Thom j » Sat, 16 Jun 2001 14:55:35

For being such a "self proclaimed intellect" you did a poor detail
job on your thread. Things that make you say "AHhhhhmhmm?"

| Ok, I should of said "Auto Sim". :-)
|
| David G Fisher

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.259 / Virus Database: 130 - Release Date: 6/6/2001

Thom j

Why Isn't N4 the "BEST" Sim Ever?

by Thom j » Sat, 16 Jun 2001 15:09:39

Hey Simon!! I had a blast for 3weeks tho in N4 and then I woke up!
Back to the F1, Grand Prix chassis-szzz & trackszz for me!!! :-)

| That's an easy one, lots and lots and lots of oval tracks and much less
| entertaining cars to drive.  You can't seriously think driving Bristol in
a
| Winston Cup car can compare with driving a Lotus 49 around the Ring.
|
| I agree, and D Kaemmer also agrees, that N4 is a better simulation than
GPL,
| but it's not a thrill to play.

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.259 / Virus Database: 130 - Release Date: 6/6/2001

Gregor Vebl

Why Isn't N4 the "BEST" Sim Ever?

by Gregor Vebl » Sat, 16 Jun 2001 17:22:22

Hi David,

actually, I think you nailed this one perfectly. I guess it will help to
separate those who think GPL is religion and those that just like it
because indeed it is one of the most enjoyable experiences on the PC.

I believe Eldred nailed it perfectly with his response. The truth is,
the changes between the GPL and N4 engine are not earth shattering, and
even though the N4 car model seems to be more refined, GPL did so much
right in the first place that it's by far not obsolete.

Going just by the features, the answer is simple; Nascar 4 is a superior
sim, and probably the best one ever.  Its superiority, however, can be
far outweighed by the personal preferences for the nature of racing.

For myself, Nascar 4 indeed is the best sim ever, and one of the top 3
games I ever played (GPL is one of those as well). I believe Nascar type
of racing lends itself to online play extremely well. If you don't go
for the Talladega or Daytona races but something less popular, the
chance of having a wrecker in the field are rather small, so even pickup
races are perfectly acceptable, and very enjoyable.

-Gregor


> It uses the GPL physics. Better graphics. Better multiplayer. More features.

> It comes straight from GPL's womb.

> Why do some of you continue to say that GPL is the best sim ever?

> David G Fisher

Thomas M?rlun

Why Isn't N4 the "BEST" Sim Ever?

by Thomas M?rlun » Sat, 16 Jun 2001 17:44:13



> > ALL N4 BASE ARE BELONG TO GPL

> What you say ! !

ahh...

Main screen turn on!

Andre Warrin

Why Isn't N4 the "BEST" Sim Ever?

by Andre Warrin » Sat, 16 Jun 2001 19:06:56



Theoretically N4 is the best available racing sim imho.
But I prefer racing in a Lotus 49 on the Ring than driving a stockcar
on an oval. Too bad N4 only has 2 roadcourses (which are tremendous
fun), the hopefully coming GPL->N4 converter from Noonan will be very
interesting..

Andre

Andre Warrin

Why Isn't N4 the "BEST" Sim Ever?

by Andre Warrin » Sat, 16 Jun 2001 19:12:16


>I agree with you on that, Viper Racing  is tip top in the physics
>department, but the tracks are just corny. If Viper had realistic
>tracks,  ie; Watkins Glen, Laguna Seca, Brands Hatch, etc. It would be
>alot stronger today in the sim community.

Yup, too bad addon tracks were never released for GPL, else I would
still play it. Like GPL, Viper Racing was a sim that deserved to much
better :(

Andre


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.