In article
I've no expertise with current Intel kit, but there is some very good
value for money to be had on the AMD side of the fence, where I've been
for a few years now.
1) AMD Barton (mobile if possible) 2500+
2) Abit NF7-S v2.0
3) 512Mb pc3200 RAM (I prefer 1Gb for the extra elbow room)
4) ATI 9800Pro
5) Possible new power supply (good ones aren't cheap)
6) Some more cooling for the CPU/PC
And some notes to go with that...
1) New Barton chips are multiplier locked, but you can almost always get a
free upgrade by running the CPU at a slightly higher voltage and the
motherboard at 200MHz instead of 166, hence the specification of pc3200
ram, which is rated to run at 200MHz.
If you can get a mobile version of the Barton that's better because (a)
they run cooler at their default speed (lower voltage) and (b) the
multiplier's unlocked. That means plenty of "fun" to be had tweaking the
most out of your cheap CPU. The only possible flaw with that is that the
motherboard BIOS might need updating to recognise the mobile version. The
CPU should still run though even if not correctly identified... it just
means poking around in the BIOS to "force" the right settings.
2) The NF7-S is a mature board with a good reputation. Comes in two
flavours IIRC, one with better onboard sound and, er... something else.
Either way, a cheap but capable board now with onboard sound & LAN.
3) Getting RAM with plenty of flexibility on a particular motherboard
(different makes of RAM and motherboards all have their quirks) can be a
bit of a lottery, even with a lot of research. But at the end of the day
there isn't a *huge* difference between my system running at 250x9 and
166x13.5. The higher motherboard bandwidth is nice to have and some
benchmarks love it. But at the end of the day it's CPU MHz that matters
most. And there's a lot to be said for the reassurance of running things
at the default speeds... in which case you might prefer to blow more money
on a higher spec CPU in the Barton range. Me, I prefer to buy 2 cheap ones
and gamble with one of them :-)
4) The 9800Pro is excellent value for money now IMO. Still not cheap, but
it'll be a while before it starts to show its age (famous last words :-).
The 9600Pro is cheaper if you need to shave some $ off the budget and can
live without the stunning high res, high fsaa performance of the 9800Pro.
Despite initial doubts I didn't regret buying a second hand 9700Pro last
year. In fact I was so impressed that this year I passed that on to
someone else and invested far too much in one of the latest x800s. High
resolution with x4fsaa helps my immersion greatly in sims. It's not
essential, obviously, but it's great to have and I appear to be ***ed
now ;-)
http://www.racesimcentral.net/'t
a bad place to start to familiarise yourself with how all but the latest
generation of vid cards compare.
5) Cards like the 9800Pro eat power (and have an extra power connector)
and can push older, less stable PSUs into instability (random reboots or
crashes, that kind of thing). A good 300w should still be fine, but I
prefer to have something a little more capable that isn't working flat out
all the time in ***.
6) Heat is a big issue these days. My AMD CPUs are cooled with the
relatively quiet and very capable Thermaltake Silent Boost. But these days
there are plenty of good, quiet coolers around... and plenty of really
noisy ones too if you're not careful. The only problem I have with the
Silent Boost is it can be tricky to fit (for me anyway :-)
Vid cards pump out an awful lot of heat as well. So it's important to have
a well ventilated case. I have plenty of extra fans around in my ***
box, but a PCI slot extractor is a cheap & painless way of quietly losing
quite a bit of extra heat from a case. It can soon get a little noisy
though when you add case fans. I solved the problem by turning the old
parts I had into a quiet second PC which is now my main machine for
desktop stuff. Others go for water cooling or wear earplugs ;-)
What else? I think that'll enough to confuse you for now, don't you?
Andrew McP