On Mon, 31 Jul 2000 06:28:46 GMT, Rod Prince
>> It's funny. All the ppl who love the graphics have second or third
>> generation PC's.
>You always stick your foot in it when you put the word all in a sentence.
>I have a P3-866 with a GeForce 2, and *my* opinion is that it's the best
>graphical F1 sim available.
>Cheers,
>Rod.
Well Rod, from your comments i'm assuming you just haven't played many
F1 sims then, probably not many pc games period. I have three systems
networked at home (including at least one that's superior in all ways
to the system you played it on) with a varitey of 3d cards and have a
TON of experience playing just about every automotive sim that's been
released in the last 10 years and i think GP3's graphics suck compared
to just about any racing sim released in the past few years, GP3's
graphics are good for 1996, not for the year 2000. Here are the specs
of my three pc's, i've installed GP3 on all three and it looks the
same (shit) on them all:
PIII 450 with an ATI All in Wonder Pro 128 AGP w/32 megs video ram and
a Voodoo3 3000 pci with 16 megs ram and 128 meg system ram.
PIII 667eb 133mhz with a Matrox G400 Dual Head w/32 megs video ram and
128 megs system ram.
PIII 933eb 133mhz with a GeoForce 2 7700 Deluxe w/32 megs video ram
and 256 megs system ram.
As you can see all three of my systems are graphics powerhouses and i
buy and download tons of games, so i have seen alot of stuff in order
to make my judgement that GP3's graphics suck. Also, i have the latest
drivers for all cards and run the game on max details at 1280x1024 on
all 3 machines. If you think GP3's graphics come even close to games
like GPL, SCGT, MGPR, hell even F1RS etc.. you are just plain blind!.