rec.autos.simulators

Game Card

Fideli

Game Card

by Fideli » Thu, 01 May 1997 04:00:00

Do I really need a dedicated game card for a driving wheel (I'll buy a
GP1)? It's not a big deal to buy a $30 game card, but the trouble is I
have only one available ISA slot, which I'll use for a HP scanner. If a
game card were really needed, I would have to buy an additional  PCI
SCSI card for the scanner, and a PCI SCSI card is way expensive. Thanks
in advance!

Stephen D. Jenkin

Game Card

by Stephen D. Jenkin » Thu, 01 May 1997 04:00:00

I use the game port on my sound card. Works fine for me.
--
Stephen D.Jenkins

ccorpor

Game Card

by ccorpor » Fri, 02 May 1997 04:00:00


> Do I really need a dedicated game card for a driving wheel (I'll buy a
> GP1)? It's not a big deal to buy a $30 game card, but the trouble is I
> have only one available ISA slot, which I'll use for a HP scanner. If a
> game card were really needed, I would have to buy an additional  PCI
> SCSI card for the scanner, and a PCI SCSI card is way expensive. Thanks
> in advance!

R:

Let me put it this way I have a thustmaster game card and I don't use it.
Becuase of the above. And if there is a difference it's so miniscule that most
people would ever know.

Now there are people who swear by them as they see a big dif., I race with
some of these people all the time. I still don't agree and it's a waste of a
slot.

There biggest argument is the range of values. TM is like 0 to 300 which
coincides closely with the actaul pot's range. While SC's like the sound
blaster are like 200-1000 which is above the pot's range. My argument to them
is that Papy realizes that most use the soundcard and they could easily divide
the SC's range to get it into synch with the actual pots range to make thing
more closely to the TM unit.

The problem with the last paragraph though is nobody from Papy has ever
confirmed or denied it. Is there and advantage? Is there programming to
compensate the SC's?

But the bottom line is my eyes and lap times I can't see a diff. worth
mentioning.

Q.B.M.

Michael E. Carve

Game Card

by Michael E. Carve » Fri, 02 May 1997 04:00:00


: Do I really need a dedicated game card for a driving wheel (I'll buy a
: GP1)? It's not a big deal to buy a $30 game card, but the trouble is I
: have only one available ISA slot, which I'll use for a HP scanner. If a
: game card were really needed, I would have to buy an additional  PCI
: SCSI card for the scanner, and a PCI SCSI card is way expensive. Thanks
: in advance!

I lived for years without one.  Unless you experience major problems,
the only advantage is a "finer" degree of control from your input
devices.  When I finally installed a Thrustmaster ACM card, my wheel and
pedals became more precise and less "twitchy".

--
**************************** Michael E. Carver *************************
     Upside out, or inside down...False alarm the only game in town.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<[ /./.  [-  < ]>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Tom Piccia

Game Card

by Tom Piccia » Sat, 03 May 1997 04:00:00



>: Do I really need a dedicated game card for a driving wheel (I'll buy a
>: GP1)? It's not a big deal to buy a $30 game card, but the trouble is I
>: have only one available ISA slot, which I'll use for a HP scanner. If a
>: game card were really needed, I would have to buy an additional  PCI
>: SCSI card for the scanner, and a PCI SCSI card is way expensive. Thanks
>: in advance!

>I lived for years without one.  Unless you experience major problems,
>the only advantage is a "finer" degree of control from your input
>devices.  When I finally installed a Thrustmaster ACM card, my wheel and
>pedals became more precise and less "twitchy".

>--
>**************************** Michael E. Carver *************************
>     Upside out, or inside down...False alarm the only game in town.

>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<[ /./.  [-  < ]>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Unfortunately many who have tried using the Soundblaster's pnp
joystick port are finding that the steering wheel (I have the T1) will
not calibrate in win95. It's always offset to the right and down after
calibration. Creative still doesn't use a self adjusting chipset on
the joystick port and that's a shame.

I went to the CH Gamecard 3. Originally I had the Trustmaster which
worked for a while in Win95 and dos just fine. But one day I booted up
and the joystick didn't work. The gamecard's ports were overwritten by
the sound card and Win95 wouldn't let me use the resources even after
I cleared the 'original configuration' box. So for a while I just ran
all the games that needed the wheel in dos. They are action games and
need the horsepower anyway.

But when I got NFS2 and now I-76 I had to use the steering wheel in
Win95 and that meant I needed a game card that would work. The ch card
works perfectly. But do alter your installation in one way when
installing. Don't delete your old joystick port from the device
manager. Just clear the box marked 'original configuration.'

Then follow the instructions in the booklet. If you delete the old
joystick port on a pnp card it will be reinstalled when you reboot.

Tom P.

Dave Walkle

Game Card

by Dave Walkle » Sun, 04 May 1997 04:00:00

Here's a somewhat related problem I'm having?  Any suggestions?

I have a SB 32PnP, thrustmaster ACM/T2.
When my system boots, it hangs for almost a minute at the:
"Award Plug And Play Bios v1.0a"
And then continues to boot slowly through the:
"Detecting PnP cards"
Whereby it detects my SB 32 PnP with all these garbled characters.
After this, my first Win95 logo screen comes up, and everything
boots at normal speed thereafter.

This has only happened since I bought my ACM card, however I need
it or I can't calibrate my T2 correctly (full brake acts as full throttle).

Thanks,

Dave Walkley

Mark Daviso

Game Card

by Mark Daviso » Sun, 04 May 1997 04:00:00


> Do I really need a dedicated game card for a driving wheel (I'll buy a
> GP1)? It's not a big deal to buy a $30 game card, but the trouble is I
> have only one available ISA slot, which I'll use for a HP scanner. If a
> game card were really needed, I would have to buy an additional  PCI
> SCSI card for the scanner, and a PCI SCSI card is way expensive. Thanks
> in advance!

I had to buy one to play I'76.  Haven't really noticed any difference
otherwise.
BTW I always play my DOS games (like N2) under DOS, not in a Win95 DOS
window.  I found that Win95 made my steering 'twitch'.  Haven't tried using
the games in Win95 since I bought the ACM so don't know if the SB port was
the problem there.

Mark
Reading, UK

Robert Johnso

Game Card

by Robert Johnso » Mon, 05 May 1997 04:00:00

 ccorpora wrote in article ...


>> Do I really need a dedicated game card for a driving wheel (I'll buy a
>> GP1)?

>Let me put it this way I have a thustmaster game card and I don't use it.
>Becuase of the above. And if there is a difference it's so miniscule that
most
>people would ever know.

>Now there are people who swear by them as they see a big dif., I race
with
>some of these people all the time. I still don't agree and it's a waste of
a
>slot.

Ditto.  The only difference I saw between a CH3 card and the SB game port
was about $30.  I can run just as well, or as bad, using the gameport on
the SB16 as the CH3.  The ONLY diference I saw was the ranges when setting
the calibration.  And as far as I can tell, this doesn't mean a whole heck
of a lot, as long as it calirates ok.  And as all of my ISA slots are
filled with the " important " cards ( SCSII, SB16, Ethernet ) the CH3 is
sitting on the shelf.

If you only have the one slot available,  save your money.  If you should
one day have an additional slot, and someone gives you a dedicated
gamecard, go ahead and give it a try.


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.