rec.autos.simulators

Slitghly OT: Racesim with ATI

Claude Lecler

Slitghly OT: Racesim with ATI

by Claude Lecler » Fri, 07 May 2004 21:55:25

Hi,

Looking at the latest X800 I might make a move towards ATI from my GF4
Ti4600. I would like to know from ATI owner if there are known problems,
mainly with FSAA with these racesims (My goal is highest resolution with
FSAA):

GPL
Nascar 2003 (I heard of problems with specific resolutions?)
F1C and Mods
TRD2 (I already read that the game disables FSAA on start on ATI, which is
not the case with GF4)
LFS
RT

Info on Mafia would also be nice...

Thanks for your inputs.

Andre

Slitghly OT: Racesim with ATI

by Andre » Fri, 07 May 2004 23:46:31

On Thu, 6 May 2004 08:55:25 -0400, "Claude Leclerc"


>Looking at the latest X800 I might make a move towards ATI from my GF4
>Ti4600. I would like to know from ATI owner if there are known problems,
>mainly with FSAA with these racesims (My goal is highest resolution with
>FSAA):

No problems for me with NR2003, F1C, LFS and RT demos on my 9700 Pro.
--

Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevant text.
Check groups.google.com before asking a question.
Dave Henri

Slitghly OT: Racesim with ATI

by Dave Henri » Sat, 08 May 2004 01:21:28



> On Thu, 6 May 2004 08:55:25 -0400, "Claude Leclerc"

>>Looking at the latest X800 I might make a move towards ATI from my GF4
>>Ti4600. I would like to know from ATI owner if there are known problems,
>>mainly with FSAA with these racesims (My goal is highest resolution with
>>FSAA):

> No problems for me with NR2003, F1C, LFS and RT demos on my 9700 Pro.

   FSAA was supposedly enabled in GPL with the last Driver update.  
Previously they only did 32bit fsaa or something like that.  Now it's
possible, but I haven't investigated it yet.  F1c works fine, BUT, the
newer Nvidia drivers are not compatible with it, so some mod groups are
working the display configs to work with those Nvidia problems...I don't
know if this will affect ATI users in the future.
   Remember, Vidcards are only a portion of your fps package.
I've lately tried to think of a simple explanation about how a system
performs.  I'm toying with the following.

   A video card will determine your maximum fps attainable,
   A cpu will be responsible for lowering fps.

     Not a hard rule, but just a generality I'm working on.  Any input?
dave henrie

Andre

Slitghly OT: Racesim with ATI

by Andre » Sat, 08 May 2004 02:10:51

On Thu, 06 May 2004 11:21:28 -0500, Dave Henrie


>I've lately tried to think of a simple explanation about how a system
>performs.  I'm toying with the following.

>   A video card will determine your maximum fps attainable,
>   A cpu will be responsible for lowering fps.

That is rather simplistic as some games are more CPU intensive than
others. The maximum fps is affected by video card fill rate and
memory, cpu, system memory, resolution, FSAA/AF settings, monitor (if
vsync enabled), etc. In short, its not simple!
--

Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevant text.
Check groups.google.com before asking a question.
Eldre

Slitghly OT: Racesim with ATI

by Eldre » Sat, 08 May 2004 09:22:42

Some might think that would be dangerous...<g>

Eldred
--
http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
Screamers League
IICC League
GPLRank -6.0    MoGPL rank +267.80
Ch.Rank +52.58   MoC +741.71
Hist. +82.34  MoH:na
N2k3 rank:in progress
Slayer Spektera lvl 72 assassin
Slayer Spectral_K lvl 38 Necro
US East

Don Burnett

Slitghly OT: Racesim with ATI

by Don Burnett » Sat, 08 May 2004 12:49:24


> Hi,

> Looking at the latest X800 I might make a move towards ATI from my GF4
> Ti4600. I would like to know from ATI owner if there are known
> problems, mainly with FSAA with these racesims (My goal is highest
> resolution with FSAA):

> GPL
> Nascar 2003 (I heard of problems with specific resolutions?)
> F1C and Mods
> TRD2 (I already read that the game disables FSAA on start on ATI,
> which is not the case with GF4)
> LFS
> RT

> Info on Mafia would also be nice...

> Thanks for your inputs.

My 9800 Pro runs N2003, F1C and mods , and NFSU beautifully.

--
Don Burnette

Kendt Eklu

Slitghly OT: Racesim with ATI

by Kendt Eklu » Sat, 08 May 2004 23:47:02

As a former Ti4200 user who went to a 9700Pro, I'll try to help out.
It was definitely a huge step up for me in IQ - I had a 3dfx Voodoo5,
so good FSAA is a must ;).  Initial reports on the X800 are *very*
positive on the performance at high res w/ FSAA.  Note that these
comments are for the current gen cards/drivers - who knows what will
hold for the X800:


> Hi,

> Looking at the latest X800 I might make a move towards ATI from my GF4
> Ti4600. I would like to know from ATI owner if there are known problems,
> mainly with FSAA with these racesims (My goal is highest resolution with
> FSAA):

> GPL

Very good - with the caveat that the latest drivers break FSAA unless
you turn off direct mirror rendering (which has a performance hit for
some people).  I run GPL on 98SE with an older driver set for this
reason.  There are also menu corruption issues, but none that make the
sim unusable.  D3D only - the OpenGL renderer seems to only work well
w/nVidia cards.

D3D only, again.  OpenGL works but is slower.  Still very good.  I run
in XP with Omega's 4.2-based drivers and FSAA is very nice.

Again, very good in my XP install.  I actually turn down the texture
quality, but I think that's because the Omega's adjust the mipmap
levels for higher quality textures, but that leads to a little texture
aliasing in distant objects.  I don't crank the Aniso to keep
performance up.
Oh - and GTR is F-ING AWESOME :)!

Don't have - don't plan to ;)

Very good also - the latest patches have continued to improve
performance.

Nice last time I ran it, but haven't fired it up in a while.

Well - Mafia is a performance hog, but the latest patches (which can
be hard to find) and the 4.x ATI drivers have made it pretty good.

BTW I'm running an AMD XP 2400+ OC'd to 3000+ specs, 512mb RAM,
9700pro OC'd to 350/350 - love that VGA Silencer :) - Audigy2 sound
card (recent upgrade from Live!, and worth it!).

I really can't see alot of downsides to the ATI cards - the 9800's are
a *steal* - much less than what I got my 9700 Pro for.  Most of the
complaints about drivers can be solved by just using the excellent
Omega drivers (*much* cleaner install, built in tweaks, settings
launcher, etc.)

HTH,
Kendt

Claude Lecler

Slitghly OT: Racesim with ATI

by Claude Lecler » Sun, 09 May 2004 11:25:03

Thanks for the info.

I will check for the specific older version of Catalyst for GPL.

My route was close to yours Rendition V1000, Voodoo 5, GF4 Ti4600 and
probably a X800 Pro as it becomes availables.

Claude



> As a former Ti4200 user who went to a 9700Pro, I'll try to help out.
> It was definitely a huge step up for me in IQ - I had a 3dfx Voodoo5,
> so good FSAA is a must ;).  Initial reports on the X800 are *very*
> positive on the performance at high res w/ FSAA.  Note that these
> comments are for the current gen cards/drivers - who knows what will
> hold for the X800:





rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.