rec.autos.simulators

by **Paz** » Sat, 29 Jun 2002 01:32:01

allright then,stop punishing gp4 because it is after all the best f1 sim
there is around.
I have played f12000(what a joke),f1 2001(not even close),f12002(it is
better,but weather effects are awful if a compare to gp4).
,gp3 was dissapointing i admit that.
And those losers who cant get their wheel configured in gp4,i have microsoft
ff wheel and it is working perfect(yeah split axis and everything.)
Sorry about my bad english...

H?kkinen rules ok.

by **redTe** » Sat, 29 Jun 2002 03:18:20

I'm sorry about your bad trolling.
Hakkinen..LOL Whooooooooo??????????

by **Douglas Elliso** » Sat, 29 Jun 2002 06:27:51

A lot of people would argue otherwise.

Doug

by **TenInch3** » Sat, 29 Jun 2002 07:38:59

I FULLY AGREE !!!

I have GP4 & F12002 and GP4 is much much better imho.
I'm aware of the shortcomings but overall it pleases me a lot more.

It even runs in full detail on a modest 1400 XP+ with a GF4 on 1280*1024

The Sauce

by **Stev** » Sat, 29 Jun 2002 22:04:31

Dude, an Athlon XP CPU, and a GF4 are not exactly modest PC's IMO
(especially if your GF4 is not an MX series).

by **Fre** » Sun, 30 Jun 2002 01:19:27

>I FULLY AGREE !!!

>I have GP4 & F12002 and GP4 is much much better imho.
>I'm aware of the shortcomings but overall it pleases me a lot more.

>It even runs in full detail on a modest 1400 XP+ with a GF4 on 1280*1024

You call that modest? That is really friggin' close to the top end in
my book.

Fred

by **TenInch3** » Sun, 30 Jun 2002 01:23:01

> > I FULLY AGREE !!!

> > I have GP4 & F12002 and GP4 is much much better imho.
> > I'm aware of the shortcomings but overall it pleases me a lot more.

> > It even runs in full detail on a modest 1400 XP+ with a GF4 on 1280*1024

> > The Sauce

> Dude, an Athlon XP CPU, and a GF4 are not exactly modest PC's IMO
> (especially if your GF4 is not an MX series).

It's a 4400 TI ;-)

by **Stev** » Sun, 30 Jun 2002 02:34:36

> > > I FULLY AGREE !!!

> > > I have GP4 & F12002 and GP4 is much much better imho.
> > > I'm aware of the shortcomings but overall it pleases me a lot more.

> > > It even runs in full detail on a modest 1400 XP+ with a GF4 on
1280*1024

> > > The Sauce

> > Dude, an Athlon XP CPU, and a GF4 are not exactly modest PC's IMO
> > (especially if your GF4 is not an MX series).

> It's a 4400 TI ;-)

Sorry to tell you this, but your PC is not what I would classify as a
"modest" PC.

by **Todd Sorense** » Sun, 30 Jun 2002 06:13:05

What are you smokin' son??

by **Todd Sorense** » Sun, 30 Jun 2002 06:19:16

Maybe I need a new computer, but what gets me most about GP4 is the lack of
"speed sensation". The only time it seems I am going more than about 30 mph
(even when the speedometer says 200) is when I run it without any***pit.
I'm not talking about bad frame rate here, just how slow it feels I'm
moving through space. This is especially noticeable after playing F1 2002.

Anyone else notice this?

Todd

by **Ruud van Ga** » Sun, 30 Jun 2002 06:48:17

On Fri, 28 Jun 2002 17:13:05 -0400, "Todd Sorensen"

>What are you smokin' son??

Perhaps the last sentence about a certain non-driving Finnish driver
gave it all away. ;)

>> allright then,stop punishing gp4 because it is after all the best f1 sim
>> there is around.
>> I have played f12000(what a joke),f1 2001(not even close),f12002(it is
>> better,but weather effects are awful if a compare to gp4).
>> ,gp3 was dissapointing i admit that.
>> And those losers who cant get their wheel configured in gp4,i have
>microsoft
>> ff wheel and it is working perfect(yeah split axis and everything.)
>> Sorry about my bad english...

>> H?kkinen rules ok.

Ruud van Gaal
Free car sim: http://www.racer.nl/
Pencil art : http://www.marketgraph.nl/gallery/

by **Ronald Stoeh** » Sun, 30 Jun 2002 07:33:57

>>allright then,stop punishing gp4 because it is after all the best f1 sim
>>there is around.

> A lot of people would argue otherwise.

And we know, the majority is always right... ;^P

--
l8er
ronny

Your mouse has moved. Windows must be restarted for the change
to take effect. Reboot now?

by **Eldre** » Sun, 30 Jun 2002 23:46:26

>Sorry about my bad english...

>H?kkinen rules ok.

Hakkinen? Who's HE?
<g>

Eldred
--
Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett
Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...

Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

by **KevinWong20** » Wed, 10 Jul 2002 18:26:34

missing "Speed sensation"?? ME TOO!!! Until....

try this: I have a AMD 2100XP, 512RAM, GF4ti4600,.... still sleeping
behind wheel.... UNTIL I set GP4 to 1024x, ON: TV -***pit -
mirrors, ALL advanced graphics options to highest (except shadows to
'low' -no loss).... sounds tough right? then I set frame rate to
22.. that was the kicker!

Your eye/brain only needs 20-22 fps to percieve fluid motion, let the
game play at 22, even if your machine can peak at 29-30 like mine does
(P.S. $400 GF4-4600 later just to play GP4). ----- AAARRGHHH
$400!!!

I also tried it on my GF2-64MB, AMD 1900XP, 256RAM.... all I had to
do was lower a few graphic options (AND KEEP THE GAME'S FRAME RATE AT
22 -or less, 19 min.) and everything worked great! -Really!

TIP #1 #1 #1 If you can turn off AA, the frame rate
increases by 50-70% depending on your card. Yes, looks better w/AA,
but do you want to play or not??

L8R
-KW

> Maybe I need a new computer, but what gets me most about GP4 is the lack of
> "speed sensation". The only time it seems I am going more than about 30 mph
> (even when the speedometer says 200) is when I run it without any***pit.
> I'm not talking about bad frame rate here, just how slow it feels I'm
> moving through space. This is especially noticeable after playing F1 2002.

by **Mark Seer** » Thu, 11 Jul 2002 02:19:17

I believe he abdicated...

MS

rec.autos.simulators

GP4+++

GP4+++

GP4+++

GP4+++

GP4+++

GP4+++

GP4+++

GP4+++

GP4+++

GP4+++

GP4+++

GP4+++

GP4+++

GP4+++

GP4+++

GP4+++