rec.autos.simulators

FSAA = Disappointment

And

FSAA = Disappointment

by And » Sun, 28 May 2000 04:00:00

On Sat, 27 May 2000 17:14:02 GMT, "Victor Chan"


>No. <G>  The P3B-F can go as high as......well, no limit.  As long as the fastest CPU from
>Intel is a coppermine and Asus has a new Bios update for it, you are ready.  Considering
>overclocking.  I had a fc-pga 500 on a P3B-F and overclocked to 750 using 150 MHz FSB.
>Now, a PIII550E overclocked to 825 on a Soyo 6VCA.  Not sure if your PIII600 is or is not
>a coppermine.  If not, I guess you can get it to 650 just by increasing the FSB.  If a
>coppermine, 800 is possible just by increasing the FSB to 133 MHz.

Ok, I'm lost.  (which is my usual state) :-)   I thought the "new"
coppermine chips required a different core voltage, or something.
I have an older P3 that isn't a coppermine.  (doesn't the coppermine
use .18 micron?) Mine is .25 I believe.  
So you are saying I can go buy any CPU as long as it is a coppermine
and just plug it in to my MB? (as long as Asus releases a bios update)
I also thought the coppermine chips ran on a 133 FSB?  
I know I can push my FSB that high, but I thought that would mess up
other things.  
Thanks for the info!  Off to check the Asus site for a bios upgrade.
:-)
Andy


And

FSAA = Disappointment

by And » Sun, 28 May 2000 04:00:00

On Sat, 27 May 2000 16:01:28 -0500, "Tracey A Miller"


>I still don't like the effect FSAA has on Viper racing, but in GPL I
>don't think I can go back to driving without it. The "movement" I was
>seeing on the screen in GPL is there without FSAA, just much worse,
>FSAA is correcting it rather than causing it.

So now you are saying FSAA is a good thing?  Make up your mind would
ya! :-)  I was just about ready to commit to a Geforce2 card, and now
you had to go and post this. <G>  (I do appreciate the feedback you
have been posting!)
What system are you running the V5 on?  ( I must have missed it on the
1st post)
Thanks,
Andy


Tracey A Mille

FSAA = Disappointment

by Tracey A Mille » Sun, 28 May 2000 04:00:00

Looks like I spoke too soon again, just had a lockup in GPL when I
went to check fps so I could answer your question. Not sure what the
deal is, but it only occurs in the one game I like best - GPL.
Figures.

On to your question; at 800x600 with 2x AA, the fps counter never
drops below 36 on an empty track. I haven't tried with AI, I never
race the AI other than to see their lap times. With 4x AA, the fps
dips down to 30 early on, but averages around 34, pegged at 36 on the
straight.

At 1024x768 with 2x AA, it looks pretty much the same as 800x600 4x,
but my monitor only runs 90hz refresh rate at that resolution so I
prefer 800x600 120hz. The Fps counter remains at 36 all the way around
the Glenn at that resolution also.

At 4x at that resolution it's about the same as 800x600, averaging
around 34 fps. 4X FSAA appears to be a much bigger hit than stepping
up the resolution.


everything turned on, details all the way up and only the mirror
setting turned down - to cars and track rather than full - and driving
from the in-car view. I did check arcade view, and there, even at 4X
FSAA, the framerate remained pegged at 36.


> On Sat, 27 May 2000 16:01:28 -0500, "Tracey A Miller"

> >First I tried it without FSAA, just to see if it would lock up. No
> >lockups but I was surprised at how bad it looked. I don't remember
GPL
> >looking this "aliased" or jaggy. So I turned on 4X FSAA and I went
> >almost a full hour without a lockup!

> Hi,
> can you tell us something about the performance of 4x FSAA? On
> www.simhq.com they said only 24 fps in 800x600 (apparently on an
empty
> track at Watkins Glen, with the GPL demo). With GPL, 24 fps on an
> empty track will result in a rather choppy driving experience...
> How does 2x FSAA look in comparison?

> tia
> Daniel

> --
>  ICQ UIN: 30333508
>  http://www.topofgames.de || http://danielshome.cjb.net

Tracey A Mille

FSAA = Disappointment

by Tracey A Mille » Sun, 28 May 2000 04:00:00


> Phew, your last report is more in line with all the reviews I read.
> I was worried for a moment. But problems with "some" games are to be
> expected with "every" new 3D card. Hopefully 3dfx will be hard at
work
> (as with the V3) updating the drivers to work with most of the

games.

Yeah, it's just my luck though that the problems are with the 2 sims I
care about most. They probably don't even know about the GPL lockups
yet, since no one outside of this newsgroup plays it.

Tracey A Mille

FSAA = Disappointment

by Tracey A Mille » Sun, 28 May 2000 04:00:00

I think I expected the V5 to make GPL look like GPL2, but its more
like going from GPL on a Playstation to GPL on a Dreamcast - same
game, same graphics, just better, clearer.

I guess you could say I'm still disappointed that FSAA wasn't
everything I hoped it would be, nirvana, but now that I have the
pausing problems solved there is no way I'm going to give up this card
and go back to non-FSAA.

Until they get this lockup problem with FSAA in GPL fixed though, I'll
just have to play NFS PU to pass the time.


> >I still don't like the effect FSAA has on Viper racing, but in GPL
I
> >don't think I can go back to driving without it. The "movement" I
was
> >seeing on the screen in GPL is there without FSAA, just much worse,
> >FSAA is correcting it rather than causing it.

> So now you are saying FSAA is a good thing?  Make up your mind would
> ya! :-)  I was just about ready to commit to a Geforce2 card, and
now
> you had to go and post this. <G>  (I do appreciate the feedback you
> have been posting!)
> What system are you running the V5 on?  ( I must have missed it on
the
> 1st post)
> Thanks,
> Andy



Tracey A Mille

FSAA = Disappointment

by Tracey A Mille » Sun, 28 May 2000 04:00:00

Ok, now I really feel like a moron. I went back and ran Viper Racing
to get some before and after FSAA shots to show a friend what I was
talking about. Guess what? The buildings at the Dundas track do the
same thing with or without FSAA.

Can someone that has Viper run a lap at Dundas and pay attention to
the buildings on the right side of the track prior to the start finish
line? The windows seem to grow right before my eyes as I'm driving
past, but I never noticed this before the V5, and it does this with
FSAA on or off.

Assuming the V5 isn't causing this phenomenon, Viper Racing seems to
be the game where FSAA actually has the least effect on. There just
isn't much aliasing to fix, so switching between no FSAA, 2X FSAA, and
4X FSAA has little effect other than loss in framerate.

"Tracey A Miller" wrote

Ronald Stoeh

FSAA = Disappointment

by Ronald Stoeh » Mon, 29 May 2000 04:00:00


snip

> I think the first evening I was looking around at the scenery
> expecting perfection and I didn't see it. Normally I really don't
> notice the scenery I guess. Going back to no FSAA was shocking though,
> I can't believe I played that way for 2 years without going blind! <G>

Phew, your last report is more in line with all the reviews I read.
I was worried for a moment. But problems with "some" games are to be
expected with "every" new 3D card. Hopefully 3dfx will be hard at work
(as with the V3) updating the drivers to work with most of the games.

--
l8er
ronny

Your mouse has moved. Windows must be restarted for the change
to take effect. Reboot now?
          |\      _,,,---,,_        I want to die like my Grandfather,
   ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_              in his sleep.
        |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'     Not like the people in his car,
       '---''(_/--'  `-'\_)            screaming their heads off!

No

FSAA = Disappointment

by No » Mon, 29 May 2000 04:00:00


spoke:

I have an MSI 6163pro. Highest clock cycle on that my mb is 8x. Look
in your bios and see what the highest clock cycle you can set it to
is. Should be higher than 6x, butyou may need to update the bios to
get them. I heard that you can put in a higher clock cycle than the
bios says anyway, but I also heard it can cause problems.
--
Nos

No

FSAA = Disappointment

by No » Mon, 29 May 2000 04:00:00


spoke:

The voltage is adjustable in the bios. If your cpu has an E
designation with 256k L2 cache it is coppermine running on a 100mhz
FSB. If it is 512K then it is the older .25 die. B designatess it as
133mhz FSB,you can buy both 133mhz FSB and 100mhz. 100mhz is much
better for overclocking. Pushing the FSB too high can cause problems
for the video card and/or the hard drive. I'm surprised he can run the
FSB at 150mhz.



--
Nos
Dave Henri

FSAA = Disappointment

by Dave Henri » Mon, 29 May 2000 04:00:00


> Heck if I know, but I doubt it's my system. I just doubt that many
> reviewers tried GPL or Viper Racing, and had I skipped these two and
> went straight to SCGT, Rally Championship, NFSHS & PU, DTR, etc. my
> initial impression would have been completely the opposite.

  I know the experience that Tracey is talking about.  when the tracks
from ICR2 were converted to N2 and 3dfx, then all the textures would
get drawn just as you arrived.  It was very disconcerting, especially
when whole textures had been replaced,(billboards etc.)  Extremely tough
to keep you eye on the road when everything around it was looking like
it was being unrolled on both sides of you.
dave henrie
And

FSAA = Disappointment

by And » Mon, 29 May 2000 04:00:00


>The voltage is adjustable in the bios. If your cpu has an E
>designation with 256k L2 cache it is coppermine running on a 100mhz
>FSB. If it is 512K then it is the older .25 die. B designatess it as
>133mhz FSB,you can buy both 133mhz FSB and 100mhz. 100mhz is much
>better for overclocking. Pushing the FSB too high can cause problems
>for the video card and/or the hard drive. I'm surprised he can run the
>FSB at 150mhz.

Nos,
Thanks for the info.  I was looking at some CPU's and notice they have
them rated for either 100 or 133 FSB, so I guess I can put any CPU in
that runs on the 100 FSB.  (assuming my bios will support the proper
voltage and clock rate)
I'll check and see what clock cycle my current bios supports next time
I reboot, but I think it goes up at 8 as well.    Also, checked the
Asus site, and saw there are a few new revisions out.   Flashing my MB
bios scares me a bit though. :-)
Thanks again for the info much appreciated!
Andy


And

FSAA = Disappointment

by And » Mon, 29 May 2000 04:00:00

On Sat, 27 May 2000 19:18:40 -0500, "Tracey A Miller"


>I think I expected the V5 to make GPL look like GPL2, but its more
>like going from GPL on a Playstation to GPL on a Dreamcast - same
>game, same graphics, just better, clearer.

>I guess you could say I'm still disappointed that FSAA wasn't
>everything I hoped it would be, nirvana, but now that I have the
>pausing problems solved there is no way I'm going to give up this card
>and go back to non-FSAA.

I too am having high hopes for the FSAA feature.  I dunno, I guess I
was expecting major leaps in terms of graphics with this feature
alone.   At least I know what to expect now, so hopefully I won't be
real disappointed.  I'm going to hold off a bit and see how the
drivers come along, and how far CPU prices drop.  The two racing sims
I play the most are GPL, and N3, and lately some NSF PU.
I also enjoy flight sims as well, so I'll wait for some reviews from
the flight sim groups to see how it fairs with them.
Thanks for the info!
Andy


Victor Cha

FSAA = Disappointment

by Victor Cha » Mon, 29 May 2000 04:00:00

Yes, the P3B is coppermine ready.  When you have a coppermine installed, the voltage is
automatically detected.  About the FSB issue, you can use 133 MHz FSB but the AGP bus
speed would be at 89 MHz which my cause problems to your AGP card.  Boards supporting
"officially" 133 MHz FSB would have a 1/2 AGP clock divider which results in 66 MHz.  The
BX chipset only supports either 1/1 or 2/3 AGP clock divider.


> On Sat, 27 May 2000 17:14:02 GMT, "Victor Chan"

> >No. <G>  The P3B-F can go as high as......well, no limit.  As long as the fastest CPU
from
> >Intel is a coppermine and Asus has a new Bios update for it, you are ready.
Considering
> >overclocking.  I had a fc-pga 500 on a P3B-F and overclocked to 750 using 150 MHz FSB.
> >Now, a PIII550E overclocked to 825 on a Soyo 6VCA.  Not sure if your PIII600 is or is
not
> >a coppermine.  If not, I guess you can get it to 650 just by increasing the FSB.  If a
> >coppermine, 800 is possible just by increasing the FSB to 133 MHz.

> Ok, I'm lost.  (which is my usual state) :-)   I thought the "new"
> coppermine chips required a different core voltage, or something.
> I have an older P3 that isn't a coppermine.  (doesn't the coppermine
> use .18 micron?) Mine is .25 I believe.
> So you are saying I can go buy any CPU as long as it is a coppermine
> and just plug it in to my MB? (as long as Asus releases a bios update)
> I also thought the coppermine chips ran on a 133 FSB?
> I know I can push my FSB that high, but I thought that would mess up
> other things.
> Thanks for the info!  Off to check the Asus site for a bios upgrade.
> :-)
> Andy



Ronald Stoeh

FSAA = Disappointment

by Ronald Stoeh » Mon, 29 May 2000 04:00:00



> > Phew, your last report is more in line with all the reviews I read.
> > I was worried for a moment. But problems with "some" games are to be
> > expected with "every" new 3D card. Hopefully 3dfx will be hard at
> work
> > (as with the V3) updating the drivers to work with most of the
> games.

> Yeah, it's just my luck though that the problems are with the 2 sims I
> care about most. They probably don't even know about the GPL lockups
> yet, since no one outside of this newsgroup plays it.

You do know Murphy, don't you? ;^)

--
l8er
ronny

Your mouse has moved. Windows must be restarted for the change
to take effect. Reboot now?
          |\      _,,,---,,_        I want to die like my Grandfather,
   ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_              in his sleep.
        |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'     Not like the people in his car,
       '---''(_/--'  `-'\_)            screaming their heads off!

Ronald Stoeh

FSAA = Disappointment

by Ronald Stoeh » Mon, 29 May 2000 04:00:00


snip

> I too am having high hopes for the FSAA feature.  I dunno, I guess I
> was expecting major leaps in terms of graphics with this feature
> alone.   At least I know what to expect now, so hopefully I won't be

All the previews I read up to now consider it a major leap, at least
the tester ALL agreed on not being able to go back to no FSAA...

I read a FSAA test using Falcon4 and the tester just loved the result,
no texture swimming, enemy planes not being jumpy collections of pixels
anymore, etc. They loved it, I just hope they don't need glasses.

--
l8er
ronny

Your mouse has moved. Windows must be restarted for the change
to take effect. Reboot now?
          |\      _,,,---,,_        I want to die like my Grandfather,
   ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_              in his sleep.
        |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'     Not like the people in his car,
       '---''(_/--'  `-'\_)            screaming their heads off!


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.