"no" with a wink would suggest the opposite.
"no" with a wink would suggest the opposite.
>>You call it a scam, which could be a libellous statement. I think the time
>>has come for you to make you libellous claim under your real name. Then
>>the West boys can decide if they want to sue you or not.
> Ooh, I've never seen a vapourware court case before. Do you think they can
> sell some more virtual ***to mark the occasion ?
> All this coming from someone called whooo. Or perhaps that is your real
> name. Doug"Whooo"Ellison. Or maybe you just like trains.
> Your support for the "West boys"(lol) is admirable. Perhaps they'll give you
> a position on their next project. Hahahahahaha
In truth, you are just a jobshite with a computer!
LOL..Fully paid up member. Just like you and all the other no-marks. Or are
you better ?
Actually, a court case with "the West boys" might be a good idea. They would
then have to come up with some tangible proof of Racing Legends or my "scam"
comment would be proven, wouldn't it ?
You really think I should apologise to a couple of two bit wannabe game
designers who can't even keep a web page up to date ?
Get real.
-Larry
Speculating that someone is running a scam, IS NOT LIBEL. Get real.
> Speculating that someone is running a scam, IS NOT LIBEL. Get real.
Scam: an illegal plan for making money.
Libel: a piece of writing which contains bad and false things about a
person.
If Ted is right and it is a scam then he has nothing to worry about if
he puts his real name and his contact details to the accusation he made.
Come on, Ted, time to put-up or shut-the-f-up.
Are you this silly in real life or is it just your online persona ?
> > What I can't believe is that you are basing this absolute "fact" on an
> > anonymous poster who has been spreading nonsense and general bile about
> > R.A.S. for a while now.
> > I'm all for reasoned argument, especially on usenet, but when you take
> > an "announcement" such as this at face value without any kind of
> > questioning it doesn't exactly make your arguments credible.
> > BTW. Unless they've decided to throw it all in since I talked to him
> > *yesterday*, this is, of course, nonsense.
> > All the best,
> > Ash
> I'm basing it on nearly 5 years of sod all apart from a few decent renders
> that any 3D Max amateur could pull off.
> It just happened that "reg the veg" rekindled my dislike for being
> bullshitted.
> So where are "they" up to with the sim of the century, then ? Or is it top
> secret bollox ?
> All the best
> Red
What is it to you if it never comes out? How have you been harmed?
There are more important things to worry about :)
Ash
>>Actually it is.
>>Scam: an illegal plan for making money.
>>Libel: a piece of writing which contains bad and false things about a
>>person.
>>If Ted is right and it is a scam then he has nothing to worry about if he
>>puts his real name and his contact details to the accusation he made.
>>Come on, Ted, time to put-up or shut-the-f-up.
> Are you this silly in real life or is it just your online persona ?
Unless you are their solicitor I'll refrain from giving someone called
"whooo" and the rest of Usenet my real name, but in the unlikely event your
buddies "the West boys" contact me, I'll gladly provide real details for the
forthcoming libel case.
You do realise you're looking like a real*** here, don't you ?
I don't care about them, their house or their vapourware. I do care about
the cat, though, and am truly sorry about that.
Seriously, the slagging I took on here over this issue still rankles and I'm
not at all surprised to see that all my original detractors have
mysteriously vanished into ***space.
Now I see users who claim they were around in 2001 using different monikers
to hide their embarrassment.
> "no" with a wink would suggest the opposite.
> Goat Herding :D
> Ash
Not really. I can do much better than this.
More to the point, are you trying hard ?
> More to the point, are you trying hard ?