>I don't care for eye candy. I care for the physics model. Take your
>screenshots and ............ with them. They are worthless.
My my. What a friendly attitude. They are on MY webspace using up my
account. It brings me some satisfaction that *some* people
appreciated them.
Who ever claimed that the GT2 physics model was great? Eye candy?
Did you think that was great? What about the poor texturing and lousy
detail? Almost any pc 3d accelerated title released in the last 3 of
4 years looks better than that. As for the physics model, its a psx
game for kids. What do you expect? Most ***s who like it like it
more for the variety of cars and fun factor than the realism IMO.
What you think of it is entirely up to you. My point was that playing
GT2(its a game remember) on a pc using an emulator is just as
satisfying as playing it on a psx, and it looks nicer. If it
satisfied the few of us who would like to see a GT-like game on the PC
then so be it.
I'm slowly developing a thick skin here in RAS, despite the generally
friendly atmosphere.
If you feel that the post didn't belong in the ng, that's another
story.
what i can't understand is, why bother to comment if you don't have
anything to add? maybe i should just assume everybody has a silent
"in my opinion" on their posts when they say something.
where's that monty python mp3. I need a laugh.
Regards all,
istoff
"Its easy to get lost in thought
if you don't go there often" - Me, 1993