rec.autos.simulators

by **Andreas Nystr?** » Sat, 15 Jun 2002 06:39:34

You had 64kb ISDN?, aha.. yes you didnt warp anything.

maybe it has todo with ISDN sends at 64kb and recieves at the same, where
56k sends with 33.6k ?

by **Damien Smit** » Sat, 15 Jun 2002 12:14:27

Don't be silly! Two reasons why GPL/N2002 ain't kings:

1. Suspect physics engines.

2. Suspect 3D engines.

'Nuff said

--
Damien Smith

ICQ: 77028579

by **David Powel** » Fri, 14 Jun 2002 19:28:04

agreed, N2002 is the best is currently available by a mile, as was N4, shame
its simulates such a dull sport...without the ovals it would be undisputed
king,

> >GPL was fine for its day - we now have a new king.

> >bmw

> Agree, N2002 is a better sim in every way compared to GPL.

> Andre

by **Goy Larse** » Sat, 15 Jun 2002 23:34:02

> agreed, N2002 is the best is currently available by a mile

Agree

Disagree, can't put my finger on it as I didn't spend much time with N4,
but the "feel" was wrong somehow, N2002 is way better than N4 ever was

AussieV8's anyone ?

Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy

"The Pits" http://www.theuspits.com/

"A man is only as old as the woman he feels"
--Groucho Marx--

by B » Sun, 16 Jun 2002 01:04:42

blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, F1 2002
stinks. Gerry - you are showing your age!

My car does over 150mph. Does that mean it is a better car than
yours? If I cut your car down, does that make mine better? Of course
not.

Nothing is perfect. EA has produced an excellent sim. REGARDLESS of
the virtues of any other sim. before it (GPL, N2002, etc).

I don't need to cut something down just because I may have a
preference for something else.

Get a life...

> > Well-said Tim. There are a few that will NEVER be happy and that is
> > fine. EA has produced an excellent sim. that will undoubtedly sell
> > well.

> > GPL was fine for its day - we now have a new king.

> Don't be silly! Two reasons why F1002 ain't king:

> 1. ***replays.

> 2.***poor online play.

> Has your brain been replaced with a rabbit dropping?

by **Gerry Aitke** » Sun, 16 Jun 2002 01:41:51

> Don't be silly! Two reasons why GPL/N2002 ain't kings:

> 1. Suspect physics engines.

> 2. Suspect 3D engines.

The only thing that's 'suspect' is you knowing a proper racing sim when
you see one.

So come on then, elaborate on these two point of your? Oh dear, I've
just invited you to talk more shit.

Apologies to everyone else.

and...

A sneer in your general direction!

by **Gerry Aitke** » Sun, 16 Jun 2002 01:44:48

> blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, F1 2002
> stinks. Gerry - you are showing your age!

> My car does over 150mph. Does that mean it is a better car than
> yours? If I cut your car down, does that make mine better? Of course
> not.

> Nothing is perfect. EA has produced an excellent sim. REGARDLESS of
> the virtues of any other sim. before it (GPL, N2002, etc).

> I don't need to cut something down just because I may have a
> preference for something else.

> Get a life...

I own a copy of F12002, and I'll have my say, thank YOU very much!

by **ymenar** » Sun, 16 Jun 2002 02:47:31

> Don't be silly! Two reasons why GPL/N2002 ain't kings:

> 1. Suspect physics engines.
> 2. Suspect 3D engines.

Hmmm, we're not talking about GP4 here Damien ;)

--
-- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
-- http://www.ymenard.8m.com/
-- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimago-Dominguez
Corporation - helping America into the New World...

by **Andre Warring** » Sun, 16 Jun 2002 03:16:01

On Fri, 14 Jun 2002 13:14:27 +1000, "Damien Smith"

>Don't be silly! Two reasons why GPL/N2002 ain't kings:

> 1. Suspect physics engines.

> 2. Suspect 3D engines.

>'Nuff said

This is a troll right? Or are you serious?

Andre

by **Bill Bollinge** » Sun, 16 Jun 2002 05:28:52

Well, I for one thinks that N2002's physics have a lot to be desired. The
draft model is all screwed up. The damage model is a joke. Just to name 2
things.

Bill / Amish on Team Brickyard
www.iracingfx.com

> On Fri, 14 Jun 2002 13:14:27 +1000, "Damien Smith"

> >Don't be silly! Two reasons why GPL/N2002 ain't kings:

> > 1. Suspect physics engines.

> > 2. Suspect 3D engines.

> >'Nuff said

> This is a troll right? Or are you serious?

> Andre

by **John Pancoas** » Sun, 16 Jun 2002 06:10:44

Yep.

John

> Well, I for one thinks that N2002's physics have a lot to be desired. The
> draft model is all screwed up. The damage model is a joke. Just to name
2
> things.

> Bill / Amish on Team Brickyard
> www.iracingfx.com

> > On Fri, 14 Jun 2002 13:14:27 +1000, "Damien Smith"

> > >Don't be silly! Two reasons why GPL/N2002 ain't kings:

> > > 1. Suspect physics engines.

> > > 2. Suspect 3D engines.

> > >'Nuff said

> > This is a troll right? Or are you serious?

> > Andre

by **jason moy** » Mon, 17 Jun 2002 00:35:07

> Don't be silly! Two reasons why GPL/N2002 ain't kings:

> 1. Suspect physics engines.

> 2. Suspect 3D engines.

> 'Nuff said

Two reasons why I don't usually read Damien Smith's RAS posts:

1. Suspect fanatical enthusiasm for F1 200x, demonstrated by the
globules of saliva splattering all over his monitor whenever the game
is discussed.

2. Suspect unbridled criticism of any Papyrus product, demonstrated by
trolling and vague statements with no explanation or thoughtful
discourse accompanying them.

If there's one thing I hate more than Papy-Nazis it's Anti-Papites.

Jason

by **Goy Larse** » Mon, 17 Jun 2002 01:03:00

> > Don't be silly! Two reasons why GPL/N2002 ain't kings:

> > 1. Suspect physics engines.

> > 2. Suspect 3D engines.

> > 'Nuff said

> Two reasons why I don't usually read Damien Smith's RAS posts:

> 1. Suspect fanatical enthusiasm for F1 200x, demonstrated by the
> globules of saliva splattering all over his monitor whenever the game
> is discussed.

> 2. Suspect unbridled criticism of any Papyrus product, demonstrated by
> trolling and vague statements with no explanation or thoughtful
> discourse accompanying them.

> If there's one thing I hate more than Papy-Nazis it's Anti-Papites.

As long as I get my AussieV8 sim I don't care either way

Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy

"The Pits" http://www.theuspits.com/

"A man is only as old as the woman he feels"
--Groucho Marx--

by **ymenar** » Mon, 17 Jun 2002 02:28:08

> Well, I for one thinks that N2002's physics have a lot to be desired. The
> draft model is all screwed up. The damage model is a joke. Just to name
2
> things.

But Bill, compared to other titles, it's still the most advanced, even in
the draft and damage model. That's what we're talking about here, a
comparison of different titles, not singled out.

--
-- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard>
-- http://www.ymenard.8m.com/
-- This announcement is brought to you by the Shimago-Dominguez
Corporation - helping America into the New World...

by **John Pancoas** » Mon, 17 Jun 2002 03:17:19

> > Well, I for one thinks that N2002's physics have a lot to be desired.
The
> > draft model is all screwed up. The damage model is a joke. Just to
name
> 2
> > things.

> But Bill, compared to other titles, it's still the most advanced, even in
> the draft and damage model. That's what we're talking about here, a
> comparison of different titles, not singled out.

Therein lies the root of the problem; there's not enough other titles for
competition.

John

rec.autos.simulators

F12002 - Is it worth it?

F12002 - Is it worth it?

F12002 - Is it worth it?

F12002 - Is it worth it?

F12002 - Is it worth it?

F12002 - Is it worth it?

F12002 - Is it worth it?

F12002 - Is it worth it?

F12002 - Is it worth it?

F12002 - Is it worth it?

F12002 - Is it worth it?

F12002 - Is it worth it?

F12002 - Is it worth it?

F12002 - Is it worth it?

F12002 - Is it worth it?

F12002 - Is it worth it?