rec.autos.simulators

Need for Speed: Lost Vegas: 8:19.9

Lephtu

Need for Speed: Lost Vegas: 8:19.9

by Lephtu » Fri, 20 Oct 1995 04:00:00



>>        Wonder of wonders on my 2nd run with the Ferrari I tied Evan,
>>        and a few dry runs with the Diablo produced a time of 8:26.3.
>>        Lephturn has mentioned an entry speed of 185 going into the
>>        first jump, which just amazes me (never over 170 here) so I
>>        think times of 8:20 or better are achieveable.
>    After seeing your posting this afternoon, well sir, I just couldn't
>refuse such a challenge!  So now, six hours later, I've come to tell everyone
>that I have bested your time!  Ha!  Ha!  Man, is it a nerve-racking ex-
>perience!  Anyhow, from my initial best time of 9:37.7 with a Diablo (I
>last played this cours a week ago, before I knew there was a contest
>on the Net), I got it down to 8:36.6 with the Ferrari.  Still no good so after
>a full hour of shaving my individual lap times (and inevitably quitting
>several times after making a tiny error on my first lap) I got it down to
>my final and best time:
>Total time: 8:19.9          Best Lap: 1:00.5
>Martin
>Nigel Mansell RIP!

New best Martin.  Best Lap 58.4 seconds.  Top Speed 229.1

My best time is still 8:12.0 though.

Replay available.

Lephturn

Martin Urs

Need for Speed: Lost Vegas: 8:19.9

by Martin Urs » Sun, 22 Oct 1995 04:00:00


: New best Martin.  Best Lap 58.4 seconds.  Top Speed 229.1

: My best time is still 8:12.0 though.

: Replay available.

: Lephturn

        You bastard...  :-p
        You haven't heard the last of me yet!  To be continued!

Martin :-)


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.