>Ok Gurus,
>I've been pricing custom built systems for Intel 450 versus AMD 400 and my
>Intel bid is about $ 1800 vs. $ 1500 (or less) for AMD with Voodoo II
>card,speakers, AGP slot, 64k ram and everything else the same also.
>FWIW, I'm running N2 (on ten only ) N99, CART, GPL ( Not very well though),
>NHRA DR, Burnout, F1RS, Castrol GP, Motoracer, and every demo on anything
>else.
>Is AMD worth the price decrease? I've always stayed with Intel before !
>Right now, I'm running a HP P166mmx with 32 mb ram, Diamond Voodoo card.
>Any opinions on which way to go? ? ?
>-Tim A. Deatherage
>"Admitted Sim ***"
>Tim, i found this on alt.com.hardware.overclocking and thought it might be of value to you
I have abit BX6 with C300A running at 504 Mhz for over a month now with no probs...and
and all the racing sims work great.....
I just wanted to post yet another success story and give a hearty
THANKS to this group for all the advice and annecdotes that made my OC
venture a success.
Four days ago I got the following:
Abit BH6
Celeron 300a SL32A Retail Box, Malaysia
128MB clone PC100 SDRAM
ATI All-in-Wonder Pro AGP2X (wanted video capture and PC2TV)
Sound Blaster PCI 128 (wanted a good sound card for voice recognition)
Quantum 12.7GB UDMA2 5400 rpm 9.5ms (5400 instead of 7200 for quiet
operation)
Cheap clone case ($80CDN = $55US)
Creative (Panasonic 588) 32X IDE CD (mutli-read capable for CD-RW
compatibility)
Old Intel Pro/10 ISA network card (had it lying around)
Old Adaptec 1542B (yes 'B'... (had it lying around), good for future
flatbed scanner/CD-RW/Tape drive usage)
NT 4.0, SP4
Paperport Strobe Parallel sheet-fed scanner
First night, I stuck in an old 600MB IDE drive as my 12.7 was still in
transit. The ABit and 300a booted right away at 300MHz. I
immediately choose the default "user defined" setting in Softmenu II
which was conveniently set up for 100MHz FSB, 4.5x clock (gee, is Abit
making the BH6 specifically for us 300a overclockers?!), and with in a
minute it was running at 450MHz. I didn't even need to change the
voltage from the default 2.00v.
I had chosen the retail box version of the 300a for the following
reasons: 3 year warranty, better quality fan than most OEM versions.
I put in a 2nd case fan on the front of the case in the space provided
for it.
All is running fine.
You will note that I'm running NT as I find it much more stable than
95/98. Also, NT is a bit more demanding on hardware
(CPU/motherboard/cache/ram) than 95/98 and so it was nice to see it
all running without a hitch.
A note for those intending to run NT on IDE drives bigger than 8GB.
The NT install will only see an 8057GB drive when you run the install.
Don't panic. Create a partition of 4096GB or less and install NT on
it. Patch the install to SP3 or greater. Run disk administrator.
You should now see the rest of the disk as available space. Partition
it the way you like and assign the drive letters to what you want.
Myself, for my 12.7GB Quantum, I created a 3GB C: for the OS and
incidentals, a 3GB D: for applications, and a 6GB E: for data. To get
the D: and E: drive letters, I first had to unassign the D: that was
given to my CD. Then I assigned D: and E: to the new partitions (I
used primary instead of extended) and finally assigned J: to my CD.
I intend to use my PC for business use and not home/hobby/games and so
I was a bit concerned about reliability. You guys here in this
newsgroup and a couple of great OC websites helped me come to the
conclusion that the 300a/450 overclock would be a stable one. As I
need max reliability, I'm not going to push for 112/464. I'm not even
going to do the 2.5% turbo. I'm very happy with this free performance
boost that makes my computer amongst the fastest that Intel makes (not
counting SMP machines).
A comment about heat. I have seen some of you recommend quite
strongly about cooling. After running the system for hours, I didn't
notice my retail box 300a getting hot at all. Further, I felt the
back of the CPU and while it was quite warm to the touch, it didn't
burn my fingers. So I'm am curious to know why some of you are
running these 'double sandwich' heatsink and fan combos. It sure
doesn't seem to need it, even at 450. ...and because I'm a freak
about quietness, I'm even thinking of removing that 2nd case fan I
installed, preferring to let convection cool the system by leaving
open any slots I'm not using and letting only the power supply fan
draw the cool air in and the warm air out the top of the case.
(Probably not though, because the cheap power supply in this cheap
case probably has a cheap fan that will fail in about a year or so and
the 2nd case fan could keep things somewhat cool if I don't notice).