rec.autos.simulators

AMD 400 vs Intel PII 450

Tim Deatherag

AMD 400 vs Intel PII 450

by Tim Deatherag » Fri, 18 Dec 1998 04:00:00

Ok Gurus,

I've been pricing custom built systems for Intel 450 versus AMD 400 and my
Intel bid is about $ 1800  vs. $ 1500 (or less) for AMD with Voodoo II
card,speakers, AGP slot, 64k ram and everything else the same also.

FWIW, I'm running N2 (on ten only ) N99, CART, GPL ( Not very well though),
NHRA DR, Burnout, F1RS,  Castrol GP, Motoracer, and every demo on anything
else.

Is AMD worth the price decrease? I've always stayed with Intel before !
Right now, I'm running a HP P166mmx with 32 mb  ram, Diamond Voodoo card.

Any opinions on which way to go? ? ?

-Tim A. Deatherage

"Admitted Sim ***"

Zack Sandber

AMD 400 vs Intel PII 450

by Zack Sandber » Fri, 18 Dec 1998 04:00:00

AMD is the way to go.  the amd k-6 II 400 is almost as fast as a pentium
450, and alot cheaper.

>Ok Gurus,

>I've been pricing custom built systems for Intel 450 versus AMD 400 and my
>Intel bid is about $ 1800  vs. $ 1500 (or less) for AMD with Voodoo II
>card,speakers, AGP slot, 64k ram and everything else the same also.

>FWIW, I'm running N2 (on ten only ) N99, CART, GPL ( Not very well though),
>NHRA DR, Burnout, F1RS,  Castrol GP, Motoracer, and every demo on anything
>else.

>Is AMD worth the price decrease? I've always stayed with Intel before !
>Right now, I'm running a HP P166mmx with 32 mb  ram, Diamond Voodoo card.

>Any opinions on which way to go? ? ?

>-Tim A. Deatherage

>"Admitted Sim ***"

DemonAlleyCa

AMD 400 vs Intel PII 450

by DemonAlleyCa » Fri, 18 Dec 1998 04:00:00

Intel - no compatiblity problems, avoid problems with AGP and Super Socket 7
boards, and more upgrade possiblities (depending on the motherboard you
select)
The Rodste

AMD 400 vs Intel PII 450

by The Rodste » Sat, 19 Dec 1998 04:00:00

I just built me an AMD k6-2 400system for about $1200. It includes the
following:
1) New ATX Case
2)Asus P5A Mobo
3)AMD K6-2 400 Mhz
4)Diamond MOnster II 12 meg
5)Diamond TNT Nvidia AGP
6)8.4 gig HD (IBM)
7)40X CDRom
8)CL 128 PCI Sound Card
9)128 meg PC100 RAM

I'm builing it myself, so if you can do it yourself you can save a ton of
money.

-The Rodster


>Ok Gurus,

>I've been pricing custom built systems for Intel 450 versus AMD 400 and my
>Intel bid is about $ 1800  vs. $ 1500 (or less) for AMD with Voodoo II
>card,speakers, AGP slot, 64k ram and everything else the same also.

>FWIW, I'm running N2 (on ten only ) N99, CART, GPL ( Not very well though),
>NHRA DR, Burnout, F1RS,  Castrol GP, Motoracer, and every demo on anything
>else.

>Is AMD worth the price decrease? I've always stayed with Intel before !
>Right now, I'm running a HP P166mmx with 32 mb  ram, Diamond Voodoo card.

>Any opinions on which way to go? ? ?

>-Tim A. Deatherage

>"Admitted Sim ***"

Thomas Enterprise

AMD 400 vs Intel PII 450

by Thomas Enterprise » Sat, 19 Dec 1998 04:00:00


> Ok Gurus,

> I've been pricing custom built systems for Intel 450 versus AMD 400 and my
> Intel bid is about $ 1800  vs. $ 1500 (or less) for AMD with Voodoo II
> card,speakers, AGP slot, 64k ram and everything else the same also.

> FWIW, I'm running N2 (on ten only ) N99, CART, GPL ( Not very well though),
> NHRA DR, Burnout, F1RS,  Castrol GP, Motoracer, and every demo on anything
> else.

> Is AMD worth the price decrease? I've always stayed with Intel before !
> Right now, I'm running a HP P166mmx with 32 mb  ram, Diamond Voodoo card.

> Any opinions on which way to go? ? ?

> -Tim A. Deatherage

> "Admitted Sim ***"

Tim, I'd stay with Intel, you will not get the same level of performance
from any AMD product so far no matter what the AMD owners may claim.
However with the advent of the K7 this may change, in fact I'm seriously
thinking about one myself.

I just got a Celeron 300A/ABIT BH6 combo with 64 meg of PC100 and an ATX
case all for $473.00, I think this is a decent price to go from 208 mhz
to 450 :).

Trev

Thomas Enterprise

AMD 400 vs Intel PII 450

by Thomas Enterprise » Sat, 19 Dec 1998 04:00:00


> AMD is the way to go.  the amd k-6 II 400 is almost as fast as a pentium
> 450, and alot cheaper.

Where do you get this info from? "Almost as fast" not according to all
the performance ratings I have read, "A lot cheaper" again not true,
evidently you havent priced the Celeron 300A which can easily be OC'd to
450.

Trev

Richard Scot

AMD 400 vs Intel PII 450

by Richard Scot » Sat, 19 Dec 1998 04:00:00



> > Ok Gurus,

> > I've been pricing custom built systems for Intel 450 versus AMD 400 and my
> > Intel bid is about $ 1800  vs. $ 1500 (or less) for AMD with Voodoo II
> > card,speakers, AGP slot, 64k ram and everything else the same also.

> > FWIW, I'm running N2 (on ten only ) N99, CART, GPL ( Not very well though),
> > NHRA DR, Burnout, F1RS,  Castrol GP, Motoracer, and every demo on anything
> > else.

> > Is AMD worth the price decrease? I've always stayed with Intel before !
> > Right now, I'm running a HP P166mmx with 32 mb  ram, Diamond Voodoo card.

> > Any opinions on which way to go? ? ?

> > -Tim A. Deatherage

> > "Admitted Sim ***"

> Tim, I'd stay with Intel, you will not get the same level of performance
> from any AMD product so far no matter what the AMD owners may claim.
> However with the advent of the K7 this may change, in fact I'm seriously
> thinking about one myself.

> I just got a Celeron 300A/ABIT BH6 combo with 64 meg of PC100 and an ATX
> case all for $473.00, I think this is a decent price to go from 208 mhz
> to 450 :).

> Trev

I'd disagree with that. I have a K6-333 with a Voodoo 2 and get
identical performance compared to a P2-400 for GPL and N2.

Framerates don't lie, and they're IDENTICAL on these two machines.
with identical setups. The Celeron may or may NOT overclock well.
With the extra cash you have to spend on the ABIT motherboard
its cheaper to buy a K6. And just as fast for games.

My 02 cents..

-Richard
---Who has WAY too many computers at home

--
 ----------------------------------------------
|Richard Scott    |  Sr System Administrator   |
|Dallas Ops Center|  http://www.racesimcentral.net/    |

 ----------------------------------------------

XCR6

AMD 400 vs Intel PII 450

by XCR6 » Sat, 19 Dec 1998 04:00:00

<<you will not get the same level of performance
from any AMD product so far no matter what the AMD owners may claim.>>>

   Tell me please, what area wouldnt I get the same performance?
 I was not an AMD fan till I bought this K6-2 cpu. but I'll tell you, for the
money its DARN good. yes the celeron 300a is also good from what I understand,
but let me ask this, had it not been for the 300a, or the "a" series celerons,
would you all still be paying 500+ dollars for the "genuine" P2's,so you could
run at 450? or would you have considered a much less expensive AMD processor?

T

John

AMD 400 vs Intel PII 450

by John » Sat, 19 Dec 1998 04:00:00

All I can say guys, is you get what you pay for.  I'll stick with Intel.
Rick Schippe

AMD 400 vs Intel PII 450

by Rick Schippe » Sat, 19 Dec 1998 04:00:00

On Thu, 17 Dec 1998 20:13:49 -0800, "Tim Deatherage"


>Ok Gurus,

>I've been pricing custom built systems for Intel 450 versus AMD 400 and my
>Intel bid is about $ 1800  vs. $ 1500 (or less) for AMD with Voodoo II
>card,speakers, AGP slot, 64k ram and everything else the same also.

>FWIW, I'm running N2 (on ten only ) N99, CART, GPL ( Not very well though),
>NHRA DR, Burnout, F1RS,  Castrol GP, Motoracer, and every demo on anything
>else.

>Is AMD worth the price decrease? I've always stayed with Intel before !
>Right now, I'm running a HP P166mmx with 32 mb  ram, Diamond Voodoo card.

>Any opinions on which way to go? ? ?

>-Tim A. Deatherage

>"Admitted Sim ***"

I would defenitely go for a Celeron 333A with an ABit BH6 Mainboard.
And then overclock it to about 416 Mhz, that's what mine is running
perfectly now. It's much cheaper than the PII 400 or PII 450 and for
games it runs almost at the same speed.

- Show quoted text -

Don Hancoc

AMD 400 vs Intel PII 450

by Don Hancoc » Sat, 19 Dec 1998 04:00:00



>> AMD is the way to go.  the amd k-6 II 400 is almost as fast as a pentium
>> 450, and alot cheaper.
>the performance ratings I have read, "A lot cheaper" again not true,
>evidently you havent priced the Celeron 300A which can easily be OC'd to
>450.

    I tend to trust the benchmarks I've seen on the 'net and we have several
K6-2 350's inhouse - they're UNimpressive to say the least! So I agree with
your first comment, BUT the K6-2 400 IS SIGNIFCANTLY less than the P2-450.
It is also SIGNICANTLY MORE expensive than the Celeron 300A which, as you
mentioned, is very o'clocking-friendly.
    Summing up: PERSONAL opinion is Celeron 300A o'clocked to 450 is the
ONLY way to fly.  To expand a K6-2 beyond 400 would require motherboard
replacement usually.  Most new motherboards support bus speeds up to 133MHz,
so replacing the CPU in a Celeron system is about ALL that would be required
to boost its speed...

"Gunner"

K.S. Br?nnic

AMD 400 vs Intel PII 450

by K.S. Br?nnic » Sat, 19 Dec 1998 04:00:00

SNIP

I know this was a slip but:

Turbo 100 mhz=103*4.5= ca 464 mhz
112*4.5=504 mhz

My C300A runs totally stable at 464 mhz at 1.9 volts. For 504 mhz I have to
increase voltage to 2.1.

Regards K.S. Br?nnick

K.S. Br?nnic

AMD 400 vs Intel PII 450

by K.S. Br?nnic » Sat, 19 Dec 1998 04:00:00

SNIP

Then you have different experiences than me.

A posting in this newsgroup described the following scenario:

K6-2350, 128 mb ram, CL V2 12  mb
With ALL graphics settings maximized in GPL (Max detail bias, all graphics
features, and all details , also full mirrors. In others words, everything
was on.) and 19 AI opponents he got 7.5 fps at the last place of the grid at
the start at Monaco.

My "old" 350 PII got about 14.8 with identical specs (CL V2 12 mb, 128 mb
ram).

This is almost double speed pr. mhz.

Are you stretching the truth a bit? Please report your numbers and lets see
if your K6 333 is twice as fast as a K6-2 350.

K.S. Br?nnick

Chath

AMD 400 vs Intel PII 450

by Chath » Sun, 20 Dec 1998 04:00:00


>Ok Gurus,

>I've been pricing custom built systems for Intel 450 versus AMD 400 and my
>Intel bid is about $ 1800  vs. $ 1500 (or less) for AMD with Voodoo II
>card,speakers, AGP slot, 64k ram and everything else the same also.

>FWIW, I'm running N2 (on ten only ) N99, CART, GPL ( Not very well though),
>NHRA DR, Burnout, F1RS,  Castrol GP, Motoracer, and every demo on anything
>else.

>Is AMD worth the price decrease? I've always stayed with Intel before !
>Right now, I'm running a HP P166mmx with 32 mb  ram, Diamond Voodoo card.

>Any opinions on which way to go? ? ?

>-Tim A. Deatherage

>"Admitted Sim ***"

>Tim, i found this on alt.com.hardware.overclocking and thought it might be of value to you

 I have abit BX6 with C300A running at 504 Mhz for over a month now with no probs...and
 and all the racing sims work great.....

 I just wanted to post yet another success story and give a hearty
THANKS to this group for all the advice and annecdotes that made my OC
venture a success.

Four days ago I got the following:

Abit BH6
Celeron 300a SL32A Retail Box, Malaysia
128MB clone PC100 SDRAM
ATI All-in-Wonder Pro AGP2X (wanted video capture and PC2TV)
Sound Blaster PCI 128 (wanted a good sound card for voice recognition)
Quantum 12.7GB UDMA2 5400 rpm 9.5ms (5400 instead of 7200 for quiet
operation)
Cheap clone case ($80CDN = $55US)
Creative (Panasonic 588) 32X IDE CD (mutli-read capable for CD-RW
compatibility)
Old Intel Pro/10 ISA network card (had it lying around)
Old Adaptec 1542B (yes 'B'... (had it lying around), good for future
flatbed scanner/CD-RW/Tape drive usage)
NT 4.0, SP4
Paperport Strobe Parallel sheet-fed scanner

First night, I stuck in an old 600MB IDE drive as my 12.7 was still in
transit.  The ABit and 300a booted right away at 300MHz.  I
immediately choose the default "user defined" setting in Softmenu II
which was conveniently set up for 100MHz FSB, 4.5x clock (gee, is Abit
making the BH6 specifically for us 300a overclockers?!), and with in a
minute it was running at 450MHz.  I didn't even need to change the
voltage from the default 2.00v.

I had chosen the retail box version of the 300a for the following
reasons:  3 year warranty, better quality fan than most OEM versions.

I put in a 2nd case fan on the front of the case in the space provided
for it.

All is running fine.

You will note that I'm running NT as I find it much more stable than
95/98.  Also, NT is a bit more demanding on hardware
(CPU/motherboard/cache/ram) than 95/98 and so it was nice to see it
all running without a hitch.

A note for those intending to run NT on IDE drives bigger than 8GB.
The NT install will only see an 8057GB drive when you run the install.
Don't panic.  Create a partition of 4096GB or less and install NT on
it.  Patch the install to SP3 or greater.  Run disk administrator.
You should now see the rest of the disk as available space.  Partition
it the way you like and assign the drive letters to what you want.
Myself, for my 12.7GB Quantum, I created a 3GB C: for the OS and
incidentals, a 3GB D: for applications, and a 6GB E: for data.  To get
the D: and E: drive letters, I first had to unassign the D: that was
given to my CD.  Then I assigned D: and E: to the new partitions (I
used primary instead of extended) and finally assigned J: to my CD.

I intend to use my PC for business use and not home/hobby/games and so
I was a bit concerned about reliability.  You guys here in this
newsgroup and a couple of great OC websites helped me come to the
conclusion that the 300a/450 overclock would be a stable one.  As I
need max reliability, I'm not going to push for 112/464.  I'm not even
going to do the 2.5% turbo.  I'm very happy with this free performance
boost that makes my computer amongst the fastest that Intel makes (not
counting SMP machines).

A comment about heat.  I have seen some of you recommend quite
strongly about cooling.  After running the system for hours, I didn't
notice my retail box 300a getting hot at all.  Further, I felt the
back of the CPU and while it was quite warm to the touch, it didn't
burn my fingers.  So I'm am curious to know why some of you are
running these 'double sandwich' heatsink and fan combos.  It sure
doesn't seem to need it, even at 450.  ...and because I'm a freak
about quietness, I'm even thinking of removing that 2nd case fan I
installed, preferring to let convection cool the system by leaving
open any slots I'm not using and letting only the power supply fan
draw the cool air in and the warm air out the top of the case.
(Probably not though, because the cheap power supply in this cheap
case probably has a cheap fan that will fail in about a year or so and
the 2nd case fan could keep things somewhat cool if I don't notice).

Nathan Wo

AMD 400 vs Intel PII 450

by Nathan Wo » Sun, 20 Dec 1998 04:00:00



Whats wrong with a Celeron 300A running at 450MHz? Cheaper too...

--
Nathan Wong          http://www.nectar.com.au/~alfacors
                        - Super Touring - Alfa Romeo -

                            - V8Supercars - CART -


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.