rec.autos.simulators

by **John Walla** » Tue, 11 Mar 1997 04:00:00

On Thu, 06 Mar 1997 12:19:54 -0500, David Gary

>You sound like the usual bystander that sticks his nose into a post and
>finds quickly that
>he really has not investigated the matter closer and ends up sticking
>his foot in his
>ass and goes down in flames when the subject he is debating on has a
>shallow foundation and
>he has not a clue about the issue of his point and usually starts to
>murmer slowly off into
>non-existence, with endings like "whatever".

David, could you maybe ask your mommy for a special Chritmas present
this year? Punctuation..........

Now a guy who has his nose in a post, his foot in his ass and going
down in flames HAS to be worth seeing! True Lies eat your heart out!

Cheers!
John

by **ymenar** » Tue, 11 Mar 1997 04:00:00

> says...

> - <snip> -

> >> America is half of the world now is it?

> >It is when it comes to F1 racing. They race entirely on the Eastern
> >hemisphere.

> - <snip> -

> When did the world change? I must have been asleep and missed it. So Canada
> and Brazil are now in a different hemisphere to the USA!! Where did they move
> to??? (-:

What!!!!!
So now I live on Montreal, on a other hemisphere then the USA??? And It
takes only 30 minutes to go to the frontier between the two countries!!!
Do I have a concorde, or a formula 1 ??? Because Montreal-USA takes
only 35 minutes and you say there on two different hemisphere!!!! Must
be a bad dream!!!!

Yes it's a bad dream, because in it they was also Geoff Crammond playing
Gp3, on a MMX 300mhz at 3fps in VGA!!!!!!

:) ironic :)

Good race at the Brickyard, (Old'Indytrack guy)

[===] Go Rubens Barrichello, Jacques Villeneuve,

| ! | And all you that thinks that Jacques Villeneuve is
|!| from Canada, your right!! He's from St-Jean sur le
|o| Richelieu, 30 minutes from Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

[--I--]
v
Fran?ois Mnard "Wasupe LeGrand"
Nien Numb in the National Star Wars League(X-Wing vs Tie-Fighter league)
http://www.dakotacom.net/~strange/
http://www.starwars.com/
Star Wars Trilogy Special Edition,N2,Gp2,Icr2.How can my life be better?
May the force be with you, always!!
Que la force soit avec toi, jamais!(for you French people)
Excuse me for my poor English(I'm French speaking)

by **Richard Walk** » Wed, 12 Mar 1997 04:00:00

Tell you what - you tell me the secret for being quick (and consistent
<g>) at N2 and I'll let you in on a few secrets on how to win at GP2 ;-)

Indeed. I only really respond to these thread when I get too pissed off
at the continued negativity of some people. All of these sims are GREAT.
None of them are perfect, but neither are any of the people posting in
r.a.s. ;-)

ROFL! Now that's something I would like to see.....

Cheers,
Richard

by **David Gar** » Wed, 12 Mar 1997 04:00:00

> David, could you maybe ask your mommy for a special Chritmas present
> this year? Punctuation..........

Sorry if you cant read my slang John, I wouldnt label you as one of
those bystanders but
your pushing you luck with silly nonsense posts. I type fairly fast and
I dont care if my
typos offend people, they get the message. Besides I've seen alot of
your posts and your no
"Webster" yourself!

Lemme grab my camera and stay still(snicker)!

Clorox,
-DG-

by **Michael E. Carve** » Thu, 13 Mar 1997 04:00:00

<snip>
: Maybe we can get Damon Hill to come to Nascar, and send Dale Earnhardt to
: Formula 1. Both look like they need a change of scenery...

That's one thing that really irks me about the IROC series. If it truly
is "International" why don't we have some F1 drivers in it? But, if I
remember correctly, I don't think F1 pilots could participate and still
keep their F1 license. The other thing that irks me is that basically
IROC only does NASCAR style racing. I know that the non-NASCAR guys
have done well, but they are at a big disadvantage.

--
**************************** Michael E. Carver *************************
Upside out, or inside down...False alarm the only game in town.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<[ /./. [- < ]>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

by **John Walla** » Thu, 13 Mar 1997 04:00:00

>At any rate, the UNDENIABLE fact is that in F1, only a 2-4 teams have
>any realistic shot at making noise, whereas in CART, so the
>probability is that unless a CART star goes to a top-3 team in F1,
>he's going to look rather ordinary, whereas a F1 star can go to about
>half the teams in CART and have a shot at winning. If you deny this
>very basic reality, your head is truly in the sand.

The question is, WHY do so many teams have a shot at winning in CART?

Thje answer is out there, and a lot of it is yellow.

Cheers!
John

by **John Walla** » Thu, 13 Mar 1997 04:00:00

On Tue, 11 Mar 1997 11:50:14 -0500, David Gary

>Sorry if you cant read my slang John, I wouldnt label you as one of
>those bystanders but your pushing you luck with silly nonsense posts.

I take it that should be "you're" pushing your luck? (note the added
grammatical extra...) :)

David, you are one of the worst people on this group for rubbishing
people's opinions and slamming them for daring to disagree with you.
If you can't take a little fun poked back at you, don't get upset at
me about it.

No, but I'm positively a Collins compared to yourself. Feel free to
flame me about any spelling or grammatical mistakes you see in my
posts. I often make typos so I make even get a chuckle out of it.

Cheers!
John

by **Randy Magrude** » Thu, 13 Mar 1997 04:00:00

SOME of it is yellow, but not all. The chassis in large part determines
the handling of the car, and yet every Formula One team has to build its
own chassis, no? So you don't have a situation where a bunch of teams are
using the same chassis. In CART you basically have the Reynard, Lola,
Penske and Swift. 4 chassis out of some 25 drivers. Then consider how few
engine types there are (Ford,Mercedes,Honda,Toyota). There's a lot of
parity there simply because of the fact that most of the teams are using
variations on the same equipment, so on any given weekend, any number of
teams can dial in their car and get their driver working well. It doesn't
really have to do with yellows. Granted, they can tip the scales in favor
of one driver or another, but I think its more of a matter of "who's hot"
from one race to the next more than what actually happens during the race.
Hiro Matushita is NOT going to win a race no matter how many yellows there
are in the thing. But probably 10 or so drivers on each given race have a
chance at being dialed in and running up front. Blaming "a lot of" CART
parity among teams on yellow is simply not supported by the facts.
Yellows just bunch up the field -- they don't determine who is going to run
fast.

Randy

by **'John' Joao Sil** » Fri, 14 Mar 1997 04:00:00

><snip>
>: Maybe we can get Damon Hill to come to Nascar, and send Dale Earnhardt to
>: Formula 1. Both look like they need a change of scenery...

>That's one thing that really irks me about the IROC series. If it truly
>is "International" why don't we have some F1 drivers in it? But, if I
>remember correctly, I don't think F1 pilots could participate and still
>keep their F1 license. The other thing that irks me is that basically
>IROC only does NASCAR style racing. I know that the non-NASCAR guys
>have done well, but they are at a big disadvantage.

Not sure how many top F1 racers would be willing to go race in the oval-only
IROC competition. Maybe if IROC added some road courses they could really
have the "International Race of Champions" as it is now, only "champions"
accustomed to oval racing seem to do well.

I've also always thought the name IROC wasn't very valid, in the same
way that the "World Series" really isn't.

Cheers.

--John
--
Note: my real e-mail address is below. Delete the asterisks.
------------------------------+--------------------------

Seattle, Washington USA. | http://www.cool.com/~jsilva

by **David Gar** » Fri, 14 Mar 1997 04:00:00

> I take it that should be "you're" pushing your luck? (note the added
> grammatical extra...) :)

(snicker)

Hahahah, I dont get upset John. I was merely replying to your "nonsense"
I dont get upset in the least at your "fun". If you read MOST of my
posts to people you will see that the people I "slam" truly deserve it
and have replied to my posts on a "lower" level and therefore get the
same
in my replies. If they want to discuss or debate in a more mature way
then
I reply in the same manner. I mirror those who I come in contact with to
get
the point across. With some of these guys who put themself on a high
horse I usually kick it out from underneath them and most of them truly
deserve it.

Well if your such a "Collins" then you would know the meaning of "flame"
which evidently you dont. When you reply to my posts It seems most of
the
time the person who is upset or flaming is you. I dont "flame" people's
grammatical mistakes. This NG is for discussion and debate about auto
SIMS.
Thats exactly what my posts are about. I dont mind a good laugh, but
when
you reply with silly nonsense like "your mommy...." and then say flame
me about my spelling or grammatical mistakes, which is it, a "flame"
or a little fun? Its obvious you dont know the difference. You truly are
a Collins!(chuckle)

AMF,

-David Gary-

by **Jim Sokolo** » Sat, 15 Mar 1997 04:00:00

>On Tue, 11 Mar 1997 11:50:14 -0500, David Gary

>> Besides I've seen alot of your posts and your no"Webster" yourself!

>No, but I'm positively a Collins compared to yourself. Feel free to
>flame me about any spelling or grammatical mistakes you see in my
>posts. I often make typos so I make even get a chuckle out of it.

I don't know if you intended it, but I'm ROTFLMAO... ("make" vs "may"
above...) :-)

---Jim Sokoloff

by **Uwe Schuerka** » Tue, 18 Mar 1997 04:00:00

>And anybody who loves racing should own all racing sims- NASCAR, ICR,
>and F1. I developed my liking for F1 from F1 sims, which I bought
>because I liked Papy's Indy sims so much, I wanted more, *any* sims!

Funny you say that, that's the way it happened with me.
I was a complete racing-hater before I saw F1GP on a friend's Amiga
2000, and from then on I was hooked and even started watching racing
on TV. Scary considering that I'm a very "green" (in the ecological
sense) person throughout otherwise.

cheers,

hoover

--

"Better to build a good reputation slowly than a bad one quickly."
--- Dave Haynie on comp.sys.be

by **John Walla** » Fri, 21 Mar 1997 04:00:00

On Thu, 13 Mar 1997 12:03:09 -0500, David Gary

>Hahahah, I dont get upset John. I was merely replying to your "nonsense"
>I dont get upset in the least at your "fun". If you read MOST of my
>posts to people you will see that the people I "slam" truly deserve it
>and have replied to my posts on a "lower" level and therefore get the
>same in my replies. If they want to discuss or debate in a more mature way
>thenI reply in the same manner. I mirror those who I come in contact with to
>get the point across. With some of these guys who put themself on a high
>horse I usually kick it out from underneath them and most of them truly
>deserve it.

Now David, it may come as a surprise to you to find that you are in a
minority of one when you say that you "kick people's high horse's out
from under them", and that they are talking "nonsense". As I'm sure
you'll be about to point out, yes this is purely my opinion, but I'd
put it to the vote anyday :)

Em David, once again that should be "you're", not "your".

If you can't work out which is fun and which is serious don't expect
me to draw you pictures. I'll give you a clue, I'm writing this with a
smile on my face. Actually I must say that you've been a lot more
decent to people recently. My point is that ANYONE can flame someone,
it really doesn't take a lot of intelligence to kick out someone's
horse. What we need are people who CAN kick horses but choose not to.
Look at Eric Busch and Mike Carver's posts. If something annoys you,
just don't reply. Changing someone's opinon in an argument around here
is rarer than rocking horse shit.

Cheers!
John

by **David Gar** » Sun, 23 Mar 1997 04:00:00

> Now David, it may come as a surprise to you to find that you are in a
> minority of one when you say that you "kick people's high horse's out
> from under them", and that they are talking "nonsense". As I'm sure
> you'll be about to point out, yes this is purely my opinion, but I'd
> put it to the vote anyday :)

Well Johnny It is obvious you do not understand what I meant by "high
horse"
I was refering to the people who state facts that are simply not true
and it seems they have not investigated the matter further. If I try to
help someone out I only do so if I know how and I only state the facts
about things.
I have apologized in the past for some of my reactions. Some people just
cant accept
apologies.

> >Well if your such a "Collins" then you would know the meaning of
"flame"

> Em David, once again that should be "you're", not "your".

Well maybe a more correct way would be "you are". Maybe you shouldnt
spend so
much time concerning "your"self with SIMS John and instead become a
English teacher.
Sometimes your "correction" of my punctuations seems to be all you have
to discuss.

Well if your a better artist than a comedian please do! ":>)

I'll give you a clue, I'm writing this with a

Hmmm, I dont "flame" anyone who hasnt "flamed" me first and I challenge
you
to prove other wise or is that otherwise?(g) Sometimes its just good ole
fun
to "flame" someone that flames me first. But this newsgroup is for
discussion
about auto simulators. Which it seems some people here dont understand.
Micheal
Carver and Eric Bush have a vast knowledge of some of the popular sims
on the market
and provise great insite. They both have helped me on occasion and have
devoted alot
to the SIM racing "fraternity" But I cant remember one of them replying
to a post
when I was debating with someone else. I guess they left that up to the
"intrepid"
John Wallace.(g)

Tides,

-David Gary-

BTW, what the hell is rocking horse shit? Is that someone who tries to
put their
horseshit to sleep. Just give it a bottle, that usually does the trick.
":>)

by **Dave Bower** » Sun, 23 Mar 1997 04:00:00

>> Now David, it may come as a surprise to you to find that you are in a
>> minority of one when you say that you "kick people's high horse's out
>> from under them", and that they are talking "nonsense". As I'm sure
>> you'll be about to point out, yes this is purely my opinion, but I'd
>> put it to the vote anyday :)

>Well Johnny It is obvious you do not understand what I meant by "high
>horse"
>I was refering to the people who state facts that are simply not true
>and it seems they have not investigated the matter further. If I try to
>help someone out I only do so if I know how and I only state the facts
>about things.
>I have apologized in the past for some of my reactions. Some people just
>cant accept
>apologies.

Stop having such harsh reactions then dammit. Your mouth is too much of
a problem, and it's certainly not making you any friends.

What's more, this is no place for a personal slanging match.

Yeah, I am *** you are glue...

- Show quoted text -

David, your shite in this newsgroup has so far been either shooting your
mouth off about how ***GP2 is, how Good Papyrus are, or just some
childish nonsense trying to retaliate after someone has slammed you for
being so single-minded and arrogant.

John Wallace deserves as much respect as Michael Carver and Eric Busch,
and provides one of the greatest resources for sim racing fans on the
internet, which is more than I can say for your 'good' self.
--
Dave Bowers

rec.autos.simulators

Geoff Crammond...?

Geoff Crammond...?

Geoff Crammond...?

Geoff Crammond...?

Geoff Crammond...?

Geoff Crammond...?

Geoff Crammond...?

Geoff Crammond...?

Geoff Crammond...?

Geoff Crammond...?

Geoff Crammond...?

Geoff Crammond...?

Geoff Crammond...?

Geoff Crammond...?

Geoff Crammond...?

Geoff Crammond...?