rec.autos.simulators

>Does anybody out there in this group notice the  darker and much more
>grainy image that Stealth 2100 gives compared to 3DFX Voodoo.
>I've heard it mentioned on here so many times that Rendition image
>quality is better which i find  to the opposite.
>GP2 and ICR2 have no graininess  and everything else that i have tried
>has this horrible grainy dark look......Quake1, Quake2,  GPL.

>I'm not really worried about Quake1 and 11 but GPL  must look better than
>than that. The Voodoo image is really clear and has no graininess.

>Is there anybody out there that has compared the image quality in GPL.
>The Stealth 2100 is great for GP2 due to built in VESA 2.0 support and i
>really like the card in Windows.

>Can anybody shed some light on this ?

> Arthur
> s t e a l t h
> r a c i n g
> http://www.***sys.com/stealthracing.html

> .

>When it comes to Quake and quake 2, the OpenGL-versions ARE dark, also on
the
>voodoo cards. The rendition Q2 renderer is quite light, looks very good
(crisp
>and clear) and is quite fast actually! It even has a possibility to set
>hardware antialiasing (not existant on voodoo) The rendition version of
quake
>1 is fast, and has a very nice image quality. The GL versions look the same

>---Asgeir---

>> I have both a StealthII and Voodoo1, I use the voodoo1 instead of the
>> Rendtion cuz I didnt like that grainyness either. Does anyone know if the
>> V2200 has the same image quality? Is this just a V2100 bug or something?

>> Arthur
>> s t e a l t h
>> r a c i n g
>> http://www.***sys.com/stealthracing.html

>> .