rec.autos.simulators

by **Jeff Meadow** » Thu, 08 Jan 1998 04:00:00

I cant seem to find the right combination to run 195 range in Qual at
dega at 70% can anyone help.

Jeff

by **gothiqu** » Fri, 09 Jan 1998 04:00:00

you only want to run 195 at taladega?? geez, and I thought my 48.97 (199
mph) was slow...

>I cant seem to find the right combination to run 195 range in Qual at
>dega at 70% can anyone help.

>Jeff

by **Mike Mabre** » Fri, 09 Jan 1998 04:00:00

And he claims to have done it in qualifying. Must've taken off restrictor
plate

>>On Thu, 8 Jan 1998 22:11:52 -0600, "gothique"

>>>you only want to run 195 at taladega?? geez, and I thought my 48.97 (199
>>>mph) was slow...

>>>>I cant seem to find the right combination to run 195 range in Qual at
>>>>dega at 70% can anyone help.

>>>>Jeff

>Sorry for the previous non-post, but my server disconnected.
>On my computer, 48.97 is approx. 195-196 mph.
>I have never run 199 in any race.

by **Jim Bonewa** » Sat, 10 Jan 1998 04:00:00

On Thu, 8 Jan 1998 22:11:52 -0600, "gothique"

>you only want to run 195 at taladega?? geez, and I thought my 48.97 (199
>mph) was slow...

>>I cant seem to find the right combination to run 195 range in Qual at
>>dega at 70% can anyone help.

>>Jeff

by **Jim Bonewa** » Sat, 10 Jan 1998 04:00:00

>On Thu, 8 Jan 1998 22:11:52 -0600, "gothique"

>>you only want to run 195 at taladega?? geez, and I thought my 48.97 (199
>>mph) was slow...

>>>I cant seem to find the right combination to run 195 range in Qual at
>>>dega at 70% can anyone help.

>>>Jeff

Sorry for the previous non-post, but my server disconnected.
On my computer, 48.97 is approx. 195-196 mph.
I have never run 199 in any race.

by **Kurtis Mill** » Sat, 10 Jan 1998 04:00:00

>>On Thu, 8 Jan 1998 22:11:52 -0600, "gothique"

>>>you only want to run 195 at taladega?? geez, and I thought my 48.97 (199
>>>mph) was slow...

>>>>I cant seem to find the right combination to run 195 range in Qual at
>>>>dega at 70% can anyone help.

>On my computer, 48.97 is approx. 195-196 mph.
>I have never run 199 in any race.

Assuming you still have the restrictor plate on, I don't think you COULD have
a 199 lap. That might have been your top speed. With a restrictor plate,
NASCAR says the maximum possible speed is something like 204. (running
the balance between acceleration and blowing the engine.) I've never gotten
N2 over 202. To run a 199 lap, you'd have to run 202 to 204 all the way down
the straights, and only scrub off 5 or 6 mph in the turns. I usually run 200
to 201 by the END of the straight, and drop to 191 or 192 through the turns,
for an average lap in the high 48's. (195-196 mph, as stated above.)

by **John Wehm** » Sat, 10 Jan 1998 04:00:00

>Assuming you still have the restrictor plate on, I don't think you COULD have
>a 199 lap. That might have been your top speed. With a restrictor plate,
>NASCAR says the maximum possible speed is something like 204. (running
>the balance between acceleration and blowing the engine.) I've never gotten
>N2 over 202. To run a 199 lap, you'd have to run 202 to 204 all the way down
>the straights, and only scrub off 5 or 6 mph in the turns. I usually run 200
>to 201 by the END of the straight, and drop to 191 or 192 through the turns,
>for an average lap in the high 48's. (195-196 mph, as stated above.)

I've run 206 at the end of the straights, with the lap turning about 197.1xx.
This is with the Tally AI upgrade from CCG AI Improvement site. Also changing
the RELS and BLAPS values to what was recommended (I think something like 114
and 50750).

Of course, this is with a full ten to twelve cars drafting down the back
stretch, which is what the CCG update is all about.

John Wehman

by **Bill Bollinge** » Sat, 10 Jan 1998 04:00:00

Running 199 Laps at dega is possible in certain conditions. Temp at 40
deg and in a good draft with a human driver. You can get over 210 on
the backstretch if drafting properly...

Bill / Amish on TEN

by **Jim Bonewa** » Sun, 11 Jan 1998 04:00:00

On Thu, 8 Jan 1998 22:11:52 -0600, "gothique"

>you only want to run 195 at taladega?? geez, and I thought my 48.97 (199
>mph) was slow...

>>I cant seem to find the right combination to run 195 range in Qual at
>>dega at 70% can anyone help.

>>Jeff

Sorry to disagree, but 48.97 on my computer is approx. 195-196 mph.
I have never run a lap of 199 in any race!

by **Michael E. Carve** » Sun, 11 Jan 1998 04:00:00

% I've run 206 at the end of the straights, with the lap turning about 197.1xx.
% This is with the Tally AI upgrade from CCG AI Improvement site. Also changing
% the RELS and BLAPS values to what was recommended (I think something like 114
% and 50750).

% Of course, this is with a full ten to twelve cars drafting down the back
% stretch, which is what the CCG update is all about.

Stay tuned, we should be releasing a "New & Improved" Talladega AI that
will make our old one look as bad as Papy's original did! <G>
--
**************************** Michael E. Carver *************************
Upside out, or inside down...False alarm the only game in town.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<[ /./. [- < ]>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

rec.autos.simulators

Qualifying setup for Dega

Qualifying setup for Dega

Qualifying setup for Dega

Qualifying setup for Dega

Qualifying setup for Dega

Qualifying setup for Dega

Qualifying setup for Dega

Qualifying setup for Dega

Qualifying setup for Dega

Qualifying setup for Dega

Qualifying setup for Dega