I have a 2mb ATI Mach64, and while I know that it sucks, I'm
wondering what kind of performance boost can I expect to see from an
upgrade. I'm not interested in meaningless GP2 log scores or benchmarks,
just framerates and CPU occupancies. My system:
P150 overclucked (yes, clucked) to 166
16mb EDO, 256k pipeline cache, 437FX chipset, ATI M64 2mb DRAM
My scores (under Win95 restarted in DOS mode):
In SVGA, with all forward textures but sky, no rear textures, and
everything rendered in mirrors except trackside objects, the estimated
framerate is 15.0 fps.
At Monaco (with the above graphics), my processor occupancy is 135% on
the grid, hits 200% in the first turn, and averagesbetween 105% and 117%
during the race.
At Canada, I get 76% on the grid, 88% in the first hairpin, and an
average of between 76% and 82% during the race.
Would anyone with a similar system please give me their results? I'd
particularly like to find out if anyone with one of the cheaper S3 cards
can do better, since I'd rather not sink a pile of cash into a card
until the Rendition and 3DFX stuff is out.
Thanks,
Glen