rehashed PR material with the occasional subjective statement. I'm
trying to figure out his logic on some of the final evaluations. For
Graphics, he said "great", with a footnote saying 3dfx graphics were
great and software rendering was horrible. For Control, however, he said
"good", with a footnote saying control was good with keyboard, but great
with joystick/wheel. ???????!!
> Games Alliance review http://www.racesimcentral.net/;rated
> it much better 75%, but still doesn't give the game justice. From reading
> the review I get the distinct possibility that I have read most of this
> information else where. Eg. Game Features, staight from the Papy site.
> Finally a review that does take about the Multiplayer aspect.
> "Since the car reacts to the throttle more than cars today it's easier to
> spin out. This was the case for me, as I spent 20 minutes simply spinning
> out, trying to get the hang of controlling the car."
> The main reason why this is happening to him.
> "Controlling the car using the keyboard takes times to get the hang of"
> "Since GPL only supports 3Dfx and Rendition 3D acceleration, users with
> other 3D cards will have to do with software rendering, which is
> unfortunately, crap. This of course is only my opinion."
> What type of *** site would let someone review Games without a 3DFX
> card??????
> Ashley.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Ashley Clifford.
> Sim Racing News - http://www.racesimcentral.net/~accli/simnews
> Melbourne, Australia.
> Web: http://www.racesimcentral.net/~ashleyc
> ----------------------------------------------------------------