rec.autos.simulators

Newer Reviews

Andre Warrin

Newer Reviews

by Andre Warrin » Sat, 02 Mar 2002 22:59:13




>>I'd be interested in trying some of those sites myself, URL please ?

>www.turkijeplus.nl
>www.slmc.nl

Btw, here's what's screwed up in Opera on my system:

www.turkijeplus.nl:
- the flash menu loads, but as soon as it's loaded and should start
playing, it disappears again
- the menu works wrong
- All the menus have the word 'figure' in it.

www.slmc.nl:
-sometimes- the menu doesn't appear.
- All the menus have the word 'figure' in it.
-sometimes- the top frame is too small, making the menu only half
visible.

Check the sites in IE how they should look like..

Andre

Goy Larse

Newer Reviews

by Goy Larse » Sat, 02 Mar 2002 23:24:09



> >I'd be interested in trying some of those sites myself, URL please ?

> www.turkijeplus.nl
> www.slmc.nl

Yep, you've got a problem with JavaScripts there, no question, bit
surprised that DreamWeaver doesn't identify Opera though, I know that
Adobe GoLive does this and has no problems creating JavaScripts that
works in all of the 3 major browsers, I'd contact Macromedia to see if
they plan an update or something

Yes I know, we could argue that Opera ought to get in line with Netscape
and Microsoft, but they aren't in line either, after what 10 years ?, so
what we have now are 3 interpretations of JavaScripts......I'm just glad
I don't do web design for a living, I'd go nuts in no time flat

I don't know the first thing about HTML...:-), and even less about
design

Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy

"The Pits"    http://www.theuspits.com/

"Animation isn't the illusion of life; it is life"
--Chuck Jones (1912-2002)--

Andre Warrin

Newer Reviews

by Andre Warrin » Sat, 02 Mar 2002 23:42:56


>Yes I know, we could argue that Opera ought to get in line with Netscape
>and Microsoft, but they aren't in line either, after what 10 years ?, so
>what we have now are 3 interpretations of JavaScripts......I'm just glad
>I don't do web design for a living, I'd go nuts in no time flat

 I chose to test and support my site only in IE. About 95% of my
visitors use IE (or have set Opera to 'identify as IE), so I'm not
going to invest much time in figuring out why Opera doesn't work with
my and many other sites.
I don't think it's up to Macromedia or me to get Opera compatible with
Dreamweaver or everything that IE can handle.
I think that's up to the guys from Opera.

Notice the frustration in my voice, such a beautiful program but so
useless :-/

Andre

Alan Gauto

Newer Reviews

by Alan Gauto » Sat, 02 Mar 2002 23:51:51



So you don't think that standards have a place in web development. Opera
is the only one of the main 3 players that actually meets them....

--
AG

Remove removes from address to remove anti-spam measures.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Never for me the lowered banner, never the last endeavour!
                                            (Damon Hill - 16th June 1999)

Uncle Feste

Newer Reviews

by Uncle Feste » Sun, 03 Mar 2002 00:18:42


> I don't think it's up to Macromedia or me to get Opera compatible with
> Dreamweaver or everything that IE can handle.
> I think that's up to the guys from Opera.

Problem is, M$ does not follow the HTML standard.  IE is not
standards-compliant.  Which is why I don't use it.  >:-(

You are demanding other browsers to do the same.  Shame on you.

--

Fester

"Is it that we need a nobrainer Linux desktop OS for people with no
brains or should people do a little more reading and smarten up?"
                                         from alt.linux.mandrake NG

Goy Larse

Newer Reviews

by Goy Larse » Sun, 03 Mar 2002 00:20:17


>  I chose to test and support my site only in IE. About 95% of my
> visitors use IE (or have set Opera to 'identify as IE), so I'm not
> going to invest much time in figuring out why Opera doesn't work with
> my and many other sites.
> I don't think it's up to Macromedia or me to get Opera compatible with
> Dreamweaver or everything that IE can handle.
> I think that's up to the guys from Opera.

By only supporting "what IE can handle", you're letting Microsoft set
the standards for what you can and can not do with your sites, isn't
that a bit short sighted ?

Just because 95% of the users visiting your site uses IE doesn't mean it
will always be like that you know, to me, as a potential customer, this
says "If they're not investing the effort to get my choice of browser,
one of the 3 major ones in this case, working correctly on their site,
they're not interested in my business...."

By letting IE set the standards for your site you're letting Microsoft
dictate the future standards of the Internet in my opinion, and no, I'm
not really anti MS, I'm just against letting one company dictate
everything, and by playing by their rules, we're letting them do just
that

Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy

"The Pits"    http://www.theuspits.com/

"Animation isn't the illusion of life; it is life"
--Chuck Jones (1912-2002)--

Andre Warrin

Newer Reviews

by Andre Warrin » Sun, 03 Mar 2002 00:27:21

On Fri, 1 Mar 2002 14:51:51 -0000, Alan Gauton


>So you don't think that standards have a place in web development. Opera
>is the only one of the main 3 players that actually meets them....

I understand your point, but imho IE -is- the standard. I don't have
exact figures, but looking at the statistics of my visitors it seems
that at least 80-90% is using IE. No wonder since IE comes standard
with Windows.

So what should I do, ignore 90% of my visitors because they are not
using a standard html browser?

I don't like this situation either, and rebelling against micro$oft is
cool etc etc but it's a fact that most PC users use windows and IE as
default browser. Hey, it's not my choice, but it's reality :-/

Andre

Goy Larse

Newer Reviews

by Goy Larse » Sun, 03 Mar 2002 00:28:43



> >Yes I know, we could argue that Opera ought to get in line with Netscape
> >and Microsoft, but they aren't in line either, after what 10 years ?, so
> >what we have now are 3 interpretations of JavaScripts......I'm just glad
> >I don't do web design for a living, I'd go nuts in no time flat

>  I chose to test and support my site only in IE. About 95% of my
> visitors use IE (or have set Opera to 'identify as IE), so I'm not
> going to invest much time in figuring out why Opera doesn't work with
> my and many other sites.
> I don't think it's up to Macromedia or me to get Opera compatible with
> Dreamweaver or everything that IE can handle.
> I think that's up to the guys from Opera.

> Notice the frustration in my voice, such a beautiful program but so
> useless :-/

http://validator.w3.org

There seems to be certain problems with your sites Andre, I'm no HTML
person so I can't really say if this affects the issue at hand though

Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy

"The Pits"    http://www.theuspits.com/

"Animation isn't the illusion of life; it is life"
--Chuck Jones (1912-2002)--

Andre Warrin

Newer Reviews

by Andre Warrin » Sun, 03 Mar 2002 00:31:28



I understand, but I surf a -lot- and so far I haven't found one site
that doesn't work with IE.
With Opera there are many sites having problems.

So what to choose.. a browser that follows the HTML standard or a
browser that actually works.. hmm..

I do not demand but I expect other browsers to be compatible with at
least most of the websites. Otherwise it's like having this beautiful
Ferrari 550 on the middle of an ocean.
Ok, I suck at these comparisons but you get my point :)

Andre

Goy Larse

Newer Reviews

by Goy Larse » Sun, 03 Mar 2002 00:38:01


> On Fri, 1 Mar 2002 14:51:51 -0000, Alan Gauton

> >So you don't think that standards have a place in web development. Opera
> >is the only one of the main 3 players that actually meets them....

> I understand your point, but imho IE -is- the standard. I don't have
> exact figures, but looking at the statistics of my visitors it seems
> that at least 80-90% is using IE. No wonder since IE comes standard
> with Windows.

> So what should I do, ignore 90% of my visitors because they are not
> using a standard html browser?

> I don't like this situation either, and rebelling against micro$oft is
> cool etc etc but it's a fact that most PC users use windows and IE as
> default browser. Hey, it's not my choice, but it's reality :-/

No Andre, by not catering for at least the 3 major browser, of which one
*is* following accepted HTML standards, you're telling potential
visitors to go***themselves :-), there are ways to make your site
work with at least Netscape, IE and Opera

I asked a friend of mine about it earlier, and Adobe GoLive uses an
identifier to figure out what browser the visitor is using, then has the
website load the appropriate JavaScript.....or something like that, told
you I wasn't a web designer :-), with a bit of pressure from their
customers, I'm sure DreamWeaver could do the same

Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy

"The Pits"    http://www.racesimcentral.net/

"Animation isn't the illusion of life; it is life"
--Chuck Jones (1912-2002)--

Goy Larse

Newer Reviews

by Goy Larse » Sun, 03 Mar 2002 00:53:01


> I understand, but I surf a -lot- and so far I haven't found one site
> that doesn't work with IE.
> With Opera there are many sites having problems.

> So what to choose.. a browser that follows the HTML standard or a
> browser that actually works.. hmm..

Good point....sort of, but the only reason this is happening is because
web designers are *letting* MS set the new standards, web designers
should at least support the browser that follows accepted HTML
standards, that way people have a choice at least, go with IE or get a
browser that follows accepted standards

There lots of computers around this world which is not using IE, some
government agencies install Opera or Netscape for instance for security
reasons, not because they're all that much safer really, but since 99%
of the malicious code is targeted at IE/Outlook......

Well, in the end it's your choice of course, I just wish you didn't let
MS set the new standards for how the internet should be run in the
future, I'll get off my soap box now :-), it's just that it annoys me
that we're letting MS get away with ***like this, one day I'm really
going to seriously start learning Linux, honestly, and practice what I
preach :-)

Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy

"The Pits"    http://www.racesimcentral.net/

"Animation isn't the illusion of life; it is life"
--Chuck Jones (1912-2002)--

Andre Warrin

Newer Reviews

by Andre Warrin » Sun, 03 Mar 2002 00:53:08


>By only supporting "what IE can handle", you're letting Microsoft set
>the standards for what you can and can not do with your sites, isn't
>that a bit short sighted ?

Well, no. So far I haven't heard one complaint from a visitor that
he/she had problems with the site, and I get a lot of online bookings
and positive reactions. That's the only thing that counts for me, we
sell travels online and I need to score. No time to keep the site
compatible with other browsers and therefore even have to skip a lot
of nice thingies because they won't work in 'hardly used' browsers.

I was a devoted netscape user untill a certain time, 2 years ago I
think, when IE released a version (4 I think) that actually seemed to
work stable, while netscape got worse and worse.
I simply choose for a browser that works the best.
What browser are you using btw?

Point taken. But let's make a bet.
I bet a sheep that over three years IE is still the biggest browser in
the market, and Opera will either have become more compatible with
IE's standards, or will have died a quick death.

Anyone actually using Netscape lately?

Andre

Andre Warrin

Newer Reviews

by Andre Warrin » Sun, 03 Mar 2002 00:55:05


>http://validator.w3.org

My sites not valid, microsofts site not valid, theuspits.com not
valid.. actually the only valid site I could find was Opera.com :)

This means that Dreamweaver also isn't using standard HTML is seems,
since simple Dreamweaver created sites are not valid too.

But my sites work with IE, most/all of my visitors use IE, so I'm
happy.

Andre

Andre Warrin

Newer Reviews

by Andre Warrin » Sun, 03 Mar 2002 01:08:15


>No Andre, by not catering for at least the 3 major browser, of which one
>*is* following accepted HTML standards, you're telling potential
>visitors to go***themselves :-), there are ways to make your site
>work with at least Netscape, IE and Opera

I'm sure there are ways, but you can imagine that making a website
compatible with 3 different browsers, that will take a lot of extra
work and time which I simply don't have.
Besides, I wouldn't have to do this for my customers either (untill I
get complaints about people not being able to visit my site that is).

I respect your opinion Goy, but I have to deal with some reality and
lack of time here ;)

Andre

Goy Larse

Newer Reviews

by Goy Larse » Sun, 03 Mar 2002 01:08:47



> >http://validator.w3.org

> My sites not valid, microsofts site not valid, theuspits.com not
> valid.. actually the only valid site I could find was Opera.com :)

> This means that Dreamweaver also isn't using standard HTML is seems,
> since simple Dreamweaver created sites are not valid too.

> But my sites work with IE, most/all of my visitors use IE, so I'm
> happy.

I know "The Pits" doesn't get a clean bill of health from this place,
and I've given Jan his fair share of grief over it :-), what I meant was
this thing...

--
You should make the first line of your HTML document a DOCTYPE
declaration, for example, for a typical HTML 4.01 document:

      <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
      <HTML>
        <HEAD>
          <TITLE>Title</TITLE>
        </HEAD>

        <BODY>
          <-- ... body of document ... -->
        </BODY>
      </HTML>
--

I don't know if it would make a difference though, this is *way* out of
my league :-), as for MS site not being valid, that's a well known
issue, they actively blocked other browser at times, Opera gave MS a
hard time over that in the press a while back, probably got more
coverage over here because Opera is a Norwegian company :-), most sites
don't get a clean bill of health, that's to be expected really

Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy

"The Pits"    http://www.theuspits.com/

"Animation isn't the illusion of life; it is life"
--Chuck Jones (1912-2002)--


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.