> > Make that not even born yet.
> My initial comment was that Sierra does indeed own Papyrus software in
> reply to someone thinking that they did not own them. Which is true,
> although, I concede that I may have the dates wrong as to when they
> actually bought them. You seem to have taken issue with the little
> comment I made about them doing nothing but Nascar sims since. It's a
> well known fact that Payrus has only been making Nascar sims for the
> last few years because their owner's think that's where the money is.
> Even if Sierra did publish Indycar2 and GPL, they soon put an end to
> those series when they saw the profits were not high enough for them.
> Please point anything in the above that is not true. And I've been PC
> *** with Papyrus sims since 1993 so***you and your stupid
> commets like the above.
You still don't get it, surprise. Hint: if Sierra and it's resources
couldn't afford to let Papy make more open wheel sims, what makes you think
Papy could by themselves, as you implied, with only a fraction of the same
resources available ?(i.e., MONEY)
Your original comment, "Yes, Sierra owned Payrus. Otherwise Papyrus would
have probably made Indycar3 and not just Nascar sims ". Sure looks like you
think if Papy wasn't with Sierra they would have made more open wheel sims.
Nope, they just would have gone out of business sooner, or would have been
with someone else who would have acted just like Sierra.
I realize in your dream world, you probably throw fits about mean old
companies that actually want things to make a profit, but you'll learn.
Blaming Sierra for sticking to that after getting burned once is
humorous.
Try to let you "superior knowledge" grasp ahold of this concept. You're
completely clueless, best to move along little fella.
