framerates are you getting in F1 2002??? Just curious...my card should be
arriving soon..
--
Dale Floyd,
Floyd Racing #38 - #83
--
Dale Floyd,
Floyd Racing #38 - #83
thats with most detail off, but as we know about f12002, unless your getting
upwards of 50fps, its unplayable compared to 70-90 or at best 150fps...
Hit a curb at 30fps, then hit the same one at 90fps....the car hardly moves
at 90, flies into the sky at 30, stupid physics lag....
A good aim is to be sure your game is running near properly is above 70....
Above a 100 i'd think its starting to work in a sweet zone....and driving is
a damn sight easier at higher FPS due to lack of physics delay....
> > Is anyone out there running the GF4 4200 on a 800 mhz P3? If so what
> > framerates are you getting in F1 2002??? Just curious...my card should
> be
> > arriving soon..
> > --
> > Dale Floyd,
> > Floyd Racing #38 - #83
turn all that rubbish off and try the game at 100fps :)
> > Is anyone out there running the GF4 4200 on a 800 mhz P3? If so what
> > framerates are you getting in F1 2002??? Just curious...my card should
> be
> > arriving soon..
> > --
> > Dale Floyd,
> > Floyd Racing #38 - #83
Id think a 13-1500mhz processor would get be needed to see any great
improvements in fill rates, hope the card doesnt suck your CPU dry...
The GF2 still sucks my 868 dry, as for putting a GF4 in an 800 machine
unless your previous card was a V3, id think youll not see any where near
the optimum output levels from it.....
sorry :)
It would prolly dish out 130+fps or maybe higher CPU, on your maybe youll
only see 80ish.....but thats just my feelings on using the lastest GFX cards
in slow machines....
backlog and CPU jam time....
Some Call Me Tim
and the way it samples the physics when the game is 100+FPS is awesome, any
monkey thats played some F12002 on a fastmachine knows this....
please re-read my posts, as they are based ON FACT, not belief....
the engine is VERY frame rate dependant, ive never experienced a sim like
it..
at 50fps you get 1 frame per metre of track at 200mph.....at 150fps you get
3 frames per metre, this makes a MASSIVE difference in visual smoothness and
makes games like GPL look like slomo replays of poorly recorded low budget
low FPS movies....
Its not what the eye can see, its how many times get a refresh per metre...
To this point find a GPL replay at 200mph (down to stavelot at spa) pause it
click the frame forward and it skips maybe 2metres between frames it
70metres per second on the road, is 0.5frames per metre....
now watch F12002 at 200mph with 150fps.....LOL the difference is ***ing
massive!!....
But this still doesnt explain why at 30fps in f12002 you hit a curb and it
reacts twice as bad as a guy running 90fps.....the model is running better,
and f12002s model just gets better the faster it runs, any PC lag of low FPS
it runs and reacts to high pressure impacts with curbs with bizarre
results....
Any with a trick machine try a slowmo program to give you 50% processor
usuage, try taking the curbs at monza T1 with 25fps, then try it with
100....
night and day....
GPL great sim, but jesus christ does it look slow and *** at high speed
after seeing what 3x the FPS looks like.....
> at 50fps you get 1 frame per metre of track at 200mph.....at 150fps you
get
> 3 frames per metre, this makes a MASSIVE difference in visual smoothness
and
> makes games like GPL look like slomo replays of poorly recorded low budget
> low FPS movies....
> Its not what the eye can see, its how many times get a refresh per
metre...
> To this point find a GPL replay at 200mph (down to stavelot at spa) pause
it
> click the frame forward and it skips maybe 2metres between frames it
> 70metres per second on the road, is 0.5frames per metre....
> now watch F12002 at 200mph with 150fps.....LOL the difference is ***ing
> massive!!....
> But this still doesnt explain why at 30fps in f12002 you hit a curb and it
> reacts twice as bad as a guy running 90fps.....the model is running
better,
> and f12002s model just gets better the faster it runs, any PC lag of low
FPS
> it runs and reacts to high pressure impacts with curbs with bizarre
> results....
> Any with a trick machine try a slowmo program to give you 50% processor
> usuage, try taking the curbs at monza T1 with 25fps, then try it with
> 100....
> night and day....
> > The physics are not any faster at higer fps in f12002 as you either set
it
> > to 100hz or 200hz (high or normal) phsyics. I aslo very much doubt if
you
> > can see any diffence visually in frame rate between 50 and 100fps unless
> > you've got weird inhuman eyes. 36fps in GPL is certainly more thasn good
> > enough for all us simmers anything above is a waste of power which is
> better
> > spent on visual quality.
> > Some Call Me Tim
> GPL great sim, but jesus christ does it look slow and *** at high
speed
> after seeing what 3x the FPS looks like.....
> > also...its not FPS for the eye, its Frame Per Meter on the road,
this is
> why
> > at 150fps F12002 looks outstnading compared to 50 or so....
> > at 50fps you get 1 frame per metre of track at 200mph.....at 150fps
you
> get
> > 3 frames per metre, this makes a MASSIVE difference in visual
smoothness
> and
> > makes games like GPL look like slomo replays of poorly recorded low
budget
> > low FPS movies....
> > Its not what the eye can see, its how many times get a refresh per
> metre...
> > To this point find a GPL replay at 200mph (down to stavelot at spa)
pause
> it
> > click the frame forward and it skips maybe 2metres between frames it
> > 70metres per second on the road, is 0.5frames per metre....
> > now watch F12002 at 200mph with 150fps.....LOL the difference is
***ing
> > massive!!....
> > But this still doesnt explain why at 30fps in f12002 you hit a curb
and it
> > reacts twice as bad as a guy running 90fps.....the model is running
> better,
> > and f12002s model just gets better the faster it runs, any PC lag of
low
> FPS
> > it runs and reacts to high pressure impacts with curbs with bizarre
> > results....
> > Any with a trick machine try a slowmo program to give you 50%
processor
> > usuage, try taking the curbs at monza T1 with 25fps, then try it
with
> > 100....
> > night and day....
> > > The physics are not any faster at higer fps in f12002 as you
either set
> it
> > > to 100hz or 200hz (high or normal) phsyics. I aslo very much doubt
if
> you
> > > can see any diffence visually in frame rate between 50 and 100fps
unless
> > > you've got weird inhuman eyes. 36fps in GPL is certainly more
thasn good
> > > enough for all us simmers anything above is a waste of power which
is
> > better
> > > spent on visual quality.
> > > Some Call Me Tim
There may be an obvious answer to this question, but so far I haven't
found it in the manual or in the control assignments!
What is the frame rate key for F12002?
Sorry!
-pw
> There may be an obvious answer to this question, but so far I haven't
> found it in the manual or in the control assignments!
> What is the frame rate key for F12002?
> Sorry!
> -pw
> > also tell me the 36fps is fine, with a number of GPLers suffering eye
> > problems in GPL, they dont or are no longer suffering in F12002...more
> FPS
> > the better...
> > GPL great sim, but jesus christ does it look slow and *** at high
> speed
> > after seeing what 3x the FPS looks like.....
> > > also...its not FPS for the eye, its Frame Per Meter on the road,
> this is
> > why
> > > at 150fps F12002 looks outstnading compared to 50 or so....
> > > at 50fps you get 1 frame per metre of track at 200mph.....at 150fps
> you
> > get
> > > 3 frames per metre, this makes a MASSIVE difference in visual
> smoothness
> > and
> > > makes games like GPL look like slomo replays of poorly recorded low
> budget
> > > low FPS movies....
> > > Its not what the eye can see, its how many times get a refresh per
> > metre...
> > > To this point find a GPL replay at 200mph (down to stavelot at spa)
> pause
> > it
> > > click the frame forward and it skips maybe 2metres between frames it
> > > 70metres per second on the road, is 0.5frames per metre....
> > > now watch F12002 at 200mph with 150fps.....LOL the difference is
> ***ing
> > > massive!!....
> > > But this still doesnt explain why at 30fps in f12002 you hit a curb
> and it
> > > reacts twice as bad as a guy running 90fps.....the model is running
> > better,
> > > and f12002s model just gets better the faster it runs, any PC lag of
> low
> > FPS
> > > it runs and reacts to high pressure impacts with curbs with bizarre
> > > results....
> > > Any with a trick machine try a slowmo program to give you 50%
> processor
> > > usuage, try taking the curbs at monza T1 with 25fps, then try it
> with
> > > 100....
> > > night and day....
> > > > The physics are not any faster at higer fps in f12002 as you
> either set
> > it
> > > > to 100hz or 200hz (high or normal) phsyics. I aslo very much doubt
> if
> > you
> > > > can see any diffence visually in frame rate between 50 and 100fps
> unless
> > > > you've got weird inhuman eyes. 36fps in GPL is certainly more
> thasn good
> > > > enough for all us simmers anything above is a waste of power which
> is
> > > better
> > > > spent on visual quality.
> > > > Some Call Me Tim
Some Call Me Tim