rec.autos.simulators

GPL 2 - what we want to see

Daniel Thorp

GPL 2 - what we want to see

by Daniel Thorp » Sat, 12 Dec 1998 04:00:00

Paul's suggestions are all good choices for GPL2 (except perhaps 1998:
circuits littered with chicanes, ugly cars with grooved tires and too much
downforce, and Shumacher to race against rather than Jim Clark - no thanks).
I would only my personal favourite season to his list:

*1963 - The height of the 1.5 litre formula. The cars should drive similarly
to the GP2 cars in GPL (that is, easier than the 400 hp monsters of 1967).
This is also the year of Jim Clark's first championship and the classic
Lotus 25 (probably the best looking GP car ever). Other drivers include
Graham Hill, Phil Hill, and John Surtees. A great year.

Schlom

GPL 2 - what we want to see

by Schlom » Sun, 13 Dec 1998 04:00:00

I say not GPL 2 but rather a sports car sim from the same era.  Le Mans,
Sebring, and Daytona as well as other endurance tracks.  One problem
though...who would want to drive a 24 hour race?!?!?!?!?!?  

I know i wouldnt.  Unless u can save midrace like in GP2.

But as far as GPL2 goes i think 1976, 1957, and 1963 are good ideas.

However, i think maybe 1958-60 would be even more interresting.  The middle of
the transfer from front to rear engines and in 58  they had 11  tracks
(includinh Indy)  which gives you a good ammount of venues.  One of the more
interresting tracks would be the last race in Moracco.  A track only used once
for GP racing.

Wolfgang Prei

GPL 2 - what we want to see

by Wolfgang Prei » Mon, 14 Dec 1998 04:00:00


>I say not GPL 2 but rather a sports car sim from the same era.  Le Mans,
>Sebring, and Daytona as well as other endurance tracks.  

I still want that historical touring car sim: Mini Coopers, Lotus
Cortinas, Ford Galaxy (what's the proper plural of "Galaxy" as a
name?) etc.

If that sim comes from Papy, you won't be able to save the race, but
you can switch with another driver doing approx. 2 hr stints. ;)
Everything else would be unrea

/&%%/&%
NO CARRIER

=REZ

GPL 2 - what we want to see

by =REZ » Tue, 15 Dec 1998 04:00:00

These are all great suggestions..  My fave would be the Can-Am series of mid
'60's to early 70's.. call it  'Can-Am Ledgends'. The Can-Am championship
was based on FIA Group 7 open race cars that had basically one rule...  no
rules!  Because of this, there was tremendous diversity of engineering ideas
from most of the reveered marques of the time; Mclaren, Chaparral, Porshe,
Lola, Ferrari, even Lotus, plus many many amazing one offs.  Some really
strange machines poped up like the knee high UOP Shadow, the 8 litre Holman
Moody Ford 'Honker', the Chaparral 2j and 2h. The series raced at several
tracks rarely modeled   such as California's Riverside Raceway, St Jovite in
Quebec, and Brigehampton NY. There were even a few non-championship Group 7
races at places like Brand Hatch.

=rez=



>>I say not GPL 2 but rather a sports car sim from the same era.  Le Mans,
>>Sebring, and Daytona as well as other endurance tracks.

>I still want that historical touring car sim: Mini Coopers, Lotus
>Cortinas, Ford Galaxy (what's the proper plural of "Galaxy" as a
>name?) etc.

>>One problem
>>though...who would want to drive a 24 hour race?!?!?!?!?!?

>>I know i wouldnt.  Unless u can save midrace like in GP2.

>If that sim comes from Papy, you won't be able to save the race, but
>you can switch with another driver doing approx. 2 hr stints. ;)
>Everything else would be unrea

>/&%%/&%
>NO CARRIER

David Ewin

GPL 2 - what we want to see

by David Ewin » Tue, 15 Dec 1998 04:00:00


> These are all great suggestions..  My fave would be the Can-Am series of mid
> '60's to early 70's.. call it  'Can-Am Ledgends'.

This also gets my vote!  Dennis Hulme, who was a champion in both F1 and
Can-Am, called this the greatest road racing series in history.

The hard part would be picking which year to model.  I think you would
have to have both Jim Hall and Bruce McLaren, so that would limit it to
1966-68 (Hall retired as a driver after the 1968 season following his
terrible accident at the season finale in Las Vegas, and McLaren died
testing his Can-Am car a few days before the start of the 1970 season).
1966 was the first year of Can-Am and the McLaren team weren't yet the
force they would quickly become.  John Surtees was the champion in a
Lola.  McLaren and Chris Amon drove for the McLaren team.  Jim Hall was
partnered by former F1 champion Phil Hill in the revolutionary winged
Chaparrals.  Other drivers included Mark Donohue and Dan Gurney. The
only drawbacks - only six races, team McLaren wasn't so *** (which
might not be a bad thing for game play but isn't as representative as a
typical Can-Am year of the period).

1967 would be a good year, but I suspect Papyrus might be reluctant to
have another sim based on the same year as GPL.  Although it might be an
interesting comparison of cars of that year (both series raced at
Mosport and Watkins Glen (or was the Glen added in 1968, my books are at
home and I'm at work)). This year was the beginning of the Bruce and
Denny Show for McLaren.  Hall was still racing, but Chaparral only had
one entry (the second car having been totaled by Hap Sharpe in Nassau
during an off season race).

1968 was very similar to 1967 - McLaren ***, occasional flashes of
brilliance from the Chaparral (marred by unreliability).  More races
were added.

1969 - the Bruce and Denny show continues.  Hall has retired but John
Surtees is now driving for Chaparral (the very odd 2H - see through
doors, very poor front visibility, the one Chaparral which was a
disaster).

1970 - Bruce McLaren has just died.  Dan Gurney briefly replaced him at
McLaren.  Denny Hulme continues to dominate.  The incredible Chaparral
2J (the Ground Effects Vehicle or just plain "Sucker") driven by Jackie
Stewart for one race and Vic Elford for the other races they entered.
This car rarely finished a race but was incredibly fast before it
broke.  This was similar to the Lotus 49 (but even more extreme) - by
far the fastest car but even more unreliable.  I can see the hotlappers
eating this one up.

After this year, the spirit of the series really changed.  The other
teams got the Chaparral banned, which Hulme later admitted was a huge
mistake. The Can-Am was no longer a "formula libre".  Sure, there were
some great, incredibly powerful cars that came along later - the
Porsches, Ferraris, Shadows - but the glory days were over and the
series was in decline.

What do you other Can-Am fans think?  What year would you pick?  I think
I would go with 1967.

Dave Ewing

Matthias Fla

GPL 2 - what we want to see

by Matthias Fla » Tue, 15 Dec 1998 04:00:00



>>I say not GPL 2 but rather a sports car sim from the same era.  Le Mans,
>>Sebring, and Daytona as well as other endurance tracks.  
>I still want that historical touring car sim: Mini Coopers, Lotus
>Cortinas, Ford Galaxy (what's the proper plural of "Galaxy" as a
>name?) etc.

Go and visit the HTWT races!

Frenchman Pierre Levegh drove Le Mans alone until 1952, where he
nearly won against Mercedes, but he overrev'd his engine after 22
hours.

Le Mans would be great in online races, with pit stops and driver
changes - someone in a international team should be awake and be able
to take over the car for the next stint.

--
   _____
 /_______\              .\\ a t t h e a d
I  XT /~~~~                    
I  500\_____       1977' Yamaha XT.Rex 500 Enduro
 \____/\__I_I      http://matthead.home.pages.de/

Paul Jone

GPL 2 - what we want to see

by Paul Jone » Tue, 15 Dec 1998 04:00:00


> 1967 would be a good year, but I suspect Papyrus might be reluctant to
> have another sim based on the same year as GPL.  Although it might be an
> interesting comparison of cars of that year (both series raced at
> Mosport and Watkins Glen (or was the Glen added in 1968, my books are at
> home and I'm at work)).

Taking that thought further, wouldn't it be great if we could drive all Papy-GPL
based cars on all Papy-GPL based tracks. It shouldn't be that hard - having
modelled both the tracks and the physics, it seems to me that any car should be
driveable on all tracks with just a little software manipulation. As Papy release
new cars/tracks, we could simply import the old tracks from our previous games
into the new ones and vice-versa.
Paul
Dave Henri

GPL 2 - what we want to see

by Dave Henri » Tue, 15 Dec 1998 04:00:00

  Isn't that kinda what the Proffessional Sports Cars sim is supposed to
be??   I believe they have it
designed so that you run the 24 hour race in shifts with the computer taking
over whenever you aren't driving.
That, I think would be cool, and an online version where one user could
handoff his car to another via the internet....gotta happen someday.
dave henrie

  Any Can Am season with McClaren's and Chaparralls gets my vote...Wings..ya
gotta luv em!
dave henrie


>I say not GPL 2 but rather a sports car sim from the same era.  Le Mans,
>Sebring, and Daytona as well as other endurance tracks.  One problem
>though...who would want to drive a 24 hour race?!?!?!?!?!?

>I know i wouldnt.  Unless u can save midrace like in GP2.

>But as far as GPL2 goes i think 1976, 1957, and 1963 are good ideas.

>However, i think maybe 1958-60 would be even more interresting.  The middle
of
>the transfer from front to rear engines and in 58  they had 11  tracks
>(includinh Indy)  which gives you a good ammount of venues.  One of the
more
>interresting tracks would be the last race in Moracco.  A track only used
once
>for GP racing.

ymenar

GPL 2 - what we want to see

by ymenar » Tue, 15 Dec 1998 04:00:00

Paul Jones wrote

Of course, with the new game engine, it is theoritically (sp?) possible to
do what you want.  It's similar to the old game engine.  You had Icr2/N1/N2
converters.  The same will happen with the new generation of Papyrus
software using the game engine.  The file structure has been pretty much
understood for GPL, since the track editors have way more experience than
just back 1 or 2years ago.

I don't think it was be as easy to Drag and drop a track (well, there is
stuff like color palettes, different file structure inside the *.dat and txt
files), but I can easily see a N3/GPL converter.

And I know Papyrus likes that. Makes GPL guys to buy N3 and N3 guys to buy
GPL ;-)

Can you imagine the 'Ring with a stock-car ?  Or the New Sears Point with a
Loti ? hah !

<ymenard drools over his keyboard>

- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard> Good race at the Brickyard!
- Official Mentally retarded guy of r.a.s.
- Excuse me for my English (I'm French speaking)
- Sponsored by http://www.awpss.com/ on the NROS
- "People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world."--

Schlom

GPL 2 - what we want to see

by Schlom » Tue, 15 Dec 1998 04:00:00

I vote for 70 because of the diversity in design (ie.- The Chapperal 2J or
"sucker" car).  67 would be my second choice though but i think the Glen was
added in 68.  I could be wrong though.  

Arto Wik

GPL 2 - what we want to see

by Arto Wik » Tue, 15 Dec 1998 04:00:00


I do not know the expected/realised market shares of simulators between
Europe and Americas, but my vote would anyhow go to some period of F1's
instead of an all American series. Perhaps those turbo charged winged
monsters of 80's, the days when we had the previous Finnish champion,
Keke Rosberg... I read some months ago, how he was driving 4 wheel slide in
the last turn of Hockenheim...

That period of car physics would certainly be a challenge to the clever
programmers of Papyrus...

Arto

=REZ

GPL 2 - what we want to see

by =REZ » Wed, 16 Dec 1998 04:00:00

Why not a sim where you can pick your own year? Also, a feature that lets
you make up your own 'fantasy' grid with cars from ANY year...

=rez=



>> These are all great suggestions..  My fave would be the Can-Am series of
mid
>> '60's to early 70's.. call it  'Can-Am Ledgends'.

>This also gets my vote!  Dennis Hulme, who was a champion in both F1 and
>Can-Am, called this the greatest road racing series in history.

>The hard part would be picking which year to model.  I think you would
>have to have both Jim Hall and Bruce McLaren, so that would limit it to
>1966-68 (Hall retired as a driver after the 1968 season following his
>terrible accident at the season finale in Las Vegas, and McLaren died
>testing his Can-Am car a few days before the start of the 1970 season).
>1966 was the first year of Can-Am and the McLaren team weren't yet the
>force they would quickly become.  John Surtees was the champion in a
>Lola.  McLaren and Chris Amon drove for the McLaren team.  Jim Hall was
>partnered by former F1 champion Phil Hill in the revolutionary winged
>Chaparrals.  Other drivers included Mark Donohue and Dan Gurney. The
>only drawbacks - only six races, team McLaren wasn't so *** (which
>might not be a bad thing for game play but isn't as representative as a
>typical Can-Am year of the period).

>1967 would be a good year, but I suspect Papyrus might be reluctant to
>have another sim based on the same year as GPL.  Although it might be an
>interesting comparison of cars of that year (both series raced at
>Mosport and Watkins Glen (or was the Glen added in 1968, my books are at
>home and I'm at work)). This year was the beginning of the Bruce and
>Denny Show for McLaren.  Hall was still racing, but Chaparral only had
>one entry (the second car having been totaled by Hap Sharpe in Nassau
>during an off season race).

>1968 was very similar to 1967 - McLaren ***, occasional flashes of
>brilliance from the Chaparral (marred by unreliability).  More races
>were added.

>1969 - the Bruce and Denny show continues.  Hall has retired but John
>Surtees is now driving for Chaparral (the very odd 2H - see through
>doors, very poor front visibility, the one Chaparral which was a
>disaster).

>1970 - Bruce McLaren has just died.  Dan Gurney briefly replaced him at
>McLaren.  Denny Hulme continues to dominate.  The incredible Chaparral
>2J (the Ground Effects Vehicle or just plain "Sucker") driven by Jackie
>Stewart for one race and Vic Elford for the other races they entered.
>This car rarely finished a race but was incredibly fast before it
>broke.  This was similar to the Lotus 49 (but even more extreme) - by
>far the fastest car but even more unreliable.  I can see the hotlappers
>eating this one up.

>After this year, the spirit of the series really changed.  The other
>teams got the Chaparral banned, which Hulme later admitted was a huge
>mistake. The Can-Am was no longer a "formula libre".  Sure, there were
>some great, incredibly powerful cars that came along later - the
>Porsches, Ferraris, Shadows - but the glory days were over and the
>series was in decline.

>What do you other Can-Am fans think?  What year would you pick?  I think
>I would go with 1967.

>Dave Ewing

Han Monsee

GPL 2 - what we want to see

by Han Monsee » Wed, 16 Dec 1998 04:00:00


> The series raced at several tracks rarely modeled   such as California's

Riverside Raceway, St Jovite in Quebec, and Brigehampton NY.

wasn't the St Jovite track in good-old Pitstop for the Commodore 64???

Han

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Als deze wedstrijd maatgevend is voor de kwaliteit van Twente en
Willem II, dan is Twente beter dan Willem II"

        Co Adriaanse na de 5-1 nederlaag van Willem II bij Twente

This message is transmitted on 100% recycled electrons

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

ymenar

GPL 2 - what we want to see

by ymenar » Wed, 16 Dec 1998 04:00:00



>> The series raced at several tracks rarely modeled   such as California's
>Riverside Raceway, St Jovite in Quebec, and Brigehampton NY.

>wasn't the St Jovite track in good-old Pitstop for the Commodore 64???

Mont-Tremblant was indeed in that title Im about 99% sure.

Btw, if a track editor for GPL ever makes reality, I make a promess this
track will be modeled in GPL.  It was the host of the 68 and 70 Formula 1
GP.

I got some good accurate maps at home + some photos... (and I raced there).

- Fran?ois Mnard <ymenard> Good race at the Brickyard!
- Official Mentally retarded guy of r.a.s.
- Excuse me for my English (I'm French speaking)
- NROS Nascar sanctioned Guide <NAS-Frank> http://www.nros.com/
- "People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realise
how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world."--


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.