> >You mean if I'm the acknowledged best at Taladega, I can't run with the big boys because
> >I don't race at Watkins Glen? Thats hardly fair. Probably covered by the ADA also.:-)
> >--
> >Chuck Stuart - Mesquite TX USA
> How is that not fair? Just because you become an ace at Talladega, do
> you honestly think you're an ace at Watkins Glen? Maybe you are,
> maybe you aren't. If you are, prove it by racing there. I can't
> think of anything more fair than that!
> Ed Martin
I you can't race on short tracks and road courses you will not win the
NRL championship. You may, however, be considered the restrictor-plate
king of NRL. There's nothing wrong with that. I agree about skill
ratings being set for each type of track. Those who hold the highest
ratings for each track will definitely be considered the best, in my
opinion. If you aren't so hot in one category you will still hold a
great deal of respect. But if you are only good at Talladega, you won't
rank high for the other speedways (Atlanta, Michigan, C***te,
Darlington, and Pocono). Those tracks require that you use speed
control in the corners and you'll have to get used to using the brake
pedal. You know, the pedal you never have to use at Talladega. :-)
David Martin