rec.autos.simulators

OT... What is 3DMark 2001???

Goy Larse

OT... What is 3DMark 2001???

by Goy Larse » Sun, 18 Nov 2001 09:01:27


> Yeah, thank god ATI released a perfect example of what vid cards should be.
> That Radeon 8500 was shipped only after they enabled all the onboard
> features and final drivers for it.
>  P.S. Those with sarcasm detectors, i apologize. Please send copies of the
> repair bills to my e-mail addy for full compensation.
>  Sorry Goy, but unless ive indulged in too many beers and cheers, i seem to
> remember this same type of discussion with every vid card and most software
> ever invented.
>  I wont even bother comparing flawed product release with the automotive
> industry. If ya really want to own something trouble free and unchanged in
> basic design, invest in Pez dispensers ! As usual, thanks fer listening :)

Actually, I didn't even mention ATI's latest release as I think it's
just another example of letting paying customers do your beta testing,
but there you go, I'm just happy that nVidia has gotten some serious
competition, maybe that'll get them both to improve on their tradition
when it comes to drivers....

Yeah, I know, some day I'll win the lottery

Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy

http://www.racesimcentral.net/
http://www.racesimcentral.net/

"A woman is an occasional pleasure but a cigar is always a smoke"
--Groucho Marx--

Goy Larse

OT... What is 3DMark 2001???

by Goy Larse » Sun, 18 Nov 2001 09:21:26


> I was saying for someone who builds computers for the public you don't know
> much!  =P   LOLOL

> I've owned 3 nVidia cards since I last owned a 3dfx or other brand and I
> have not had a single issue using them on Win98SE or Win2K Pro.  There are
> numerous drivers from which to choose... some approved, some not.. but they
> are there if you so choose.  All have worked flawlessly.

Well, aren't you the lucky one, we build a couple of hundred systems
every year and I'm the one who does most of the tech support.....

"Hello, how may I help you"

"Hey, we bought this computer just two weeks ago and "so and so" games
won't run"

"Ok, there's a new driver out from nVidia, have you tried installing
that one"

"What's a driver......"

<sigh>

"Ok, what you need to do is <insert appropriate explanation here>, see
if that helps"

"Ok thx"
---
one hour later
---

"Hi it's me again"

"Sorry, who is this again"

"Me with the PC problems"

<sigh>

"Ok, please remind me again, what problems were you having"

"so and so games won't work and you told me to DL and install the latest
driver and it didn't help"

"Ok, what we're gonna do now is to try an install an older driver and
see if that helps, if you come down to the shop I'll have them on a CD
for you or you can DL them from this web site"

etc etc, but with a bit of luck we'll soon find a driver which works for
their PC, then they DL and run 3DMark or some other BM tool, and we get
another phone call

"Hey, that driver you told me to install slowed my PC by almost 10% in
Q3, I can now only get 85 fps ......."

<big sigh>

I miss DOS, all we had to worry about then was Config.sys, Autoexec.bat,
XMS, EMS, Smartdrive, Memmaker, conventional memory, mousedrivers and
drivers for your soundcard and you were all set, unless you wanted to
play "Aces over Europe" of course, in which case you needed at least
605k of conventional memory.........oh never mind

Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy

http://www.theuspits.com
http://www.teammirage.com

"A woman is an occasional pleasure but a cigar is always a smoke"
--Groucho Marx--

STP

OT... What is 3DMark 2001???

by STP » Sun, 18 Nov 2001 09:50:41


No....the R8500 gets better benchmarks than the GF3 Ti 500 on 3D Mark 2001.
It's the games where the 8500 usually falls behind. All 3D Mark is really
good for is benchmarking your own system as you try various tweaks, new
drivers etc. That way you can easily tell if the new drivers and tweaks
improve performance or not.

STP

OT... What is 3DMark 2001???

by STP » Sun, 18 Nov 2001 09:55:04


Well, that's better than a customer who has an ATI card and calls up with
the same problem. "Sorry, you are shit out of luck because there are no new
drivers".

Rafe McAulif

OT... What is 3DMark 2001???

by Rafe McAulif » Sun, 18 Nov 2001 11:16:48

Quite true, 3D Mark is purely a synthetic benchmark and has no direct
relation to how well games will run. Manufacturers do optimise their
drivers toward it because high scores sell well. We need them to take
more notice of GPL and N4 frame rates for comparison. Maybe a timedemo
of these would be a good tool for this.

And yes, it is biased towards the GF3, mainly because it takes full
advantage of all the DX8 features of it.

Rafe Mc



>> I tried the Raedon 8500 and the NVidia Ti500 and 3DMark 2001 gave the Raedon
>> 8500 a better score...

>Oki, I just noticed when I did a bit of bench marking a good while that
>even though a card scored worse than another in 3DMark, it might still
>run NHeat and MBTR, which I used to have some actual sims to compare
>with, just as well as the card which scored better in 3DMark, which more
>often than not was an nVidia based card, and I talked to another
>hardware enthusiast about it, and he was of the same opinion....

>Guess all card manufacturers now writes drivers to score well in 3DMark
>and Quake 3, hopefully they'll soon write drivers which will give us
>better performance in games as well....:-)

>Beers and cheers
>(uncle) Goy

>http://www.theuspits.com
>http://www.teammirage.com

>"A woman is an occasional pleasure but a cigar is always a smoke"
>--Groucho Marx--

David L. Coo

OT... What is 3DMark 2001???

by David L. Coo » Sun, 18 Nov 2001 12:24:37

After testing those two cards I actually ended up buying the Ti200.  Most
bang for the buck IMHO.  Funny thing is in Rally Trophy this card performs
better at higher resolutions running 32-bit color.  I get a better framerate
at 1280x1024x32 (40-50fps) than I do at 1024x768x16 (30-40fps) go figure...
I'm not complaining though!

David Cook


> Quite true, 3D Mark is purely a synthetic benchmark and has no direct
> relation to how well games will run. Manufacturers do optimise their
> drivers toward it because high scores sell well. We need them to take
> more notice of GPL and N4 frame rates for comparison. Maybe a timedemo
> of these would be a good tool for this.

> And yes, it is biased towards the GF3, mainly because it takes full
> advantage of all the DX8 features of it.

> Rafe Mc



> >> I tried the Raedon 8500 and the NVidia Ti500 and 3DMark 2001 gave the
Raedon
> >> 8500 a better score...

> >Oki, I just noticed when I did a bit of bench marking a good while that
> >even though a card scored worse than another in 3DMark, it might still
> >run NHeat and MBTR, which I used to have some actual sims to compare
> >with, just as well as the card which scored better in 3DMark, which more
> >often than not was an nVidia based card, and I talked to another
> >hardware enthusiast about it, and he was of the same opinion....

> >Guess all card manufacturers now writes drivers to score well in 3DMark
> >and Quake 3, hopefully they'll soon write drivers which will give us
> >better performance in games as well....:-)

> >Beers and cheers
> >(uncle) Goy

> >http://www.theuspits.com
> >http://www.teammirage.com

> >"A woman is an occasional pleasure but a cigar is always a smoke"
> >--Groucho Marx--

Goy Larse

OT... What is 3DMark 2001???

by Goy Larse » Sun, 18 Nov 2001 18:23:07




> > Well, aren't you the lucky one, we build a couple of hundred systems
> > every year and I'm the one who does most of the tech support.....

> > "Hello, how may I help you"

> > "Hey, we bought this computer just two weeks ago and "so and so" games
> > won't run"

> > "Ok, there's a new driver out from nVidia, have you tried installing
> > that one"

> Well, that's better than a customer who has an ATI card and calls up with
> the same problem. "Sorry, you are shit out of luck because there are no new
> drivers".

Maybe.....but is it "good" ?

Just because you do something a little better than someone else doesn't
automatically make it a good product, seems to me like ATI is playing
nVidia's own game, which is a shame really, but as long as there's some
real competition out there....

Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy

"The Pits"    http://www.theuspits.com/

* Spam is for losers who can't get business any other way *
"Spamkiller"    http://www.spamkiller.com

Goy Larse

OT... What is 3DMark 2001???

by Goy Larse » Sun, 18 Nov 2001 18:29:06


> Quite true, 3D Mark is purely a synthetic benchmark and has no direct
> relation to how well games will run. Manufacturers do optimise their
> drivers toward it because high scores sell well. We need them to take
> more notice of GPL and N4 frame rates for comparison. Maybe a timedemo
> of these would be a good tool for this.

Knew you were a smart guy Rafe.....:-), which is why I chose NHeat and
MBTR, because the demos of both these games had that feature

Well, I guess I should have said that 3DMark is biased towards the same
line of thinking that nVidia has, so rather than test for something
useful, like how it will run my current crop of games, it tells me how
some of my future games might run on one card vs another....:-), also, I
do get a bit skeptical when one brand of computers has advertising on a
benchmark.......

Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy

"The Pits"    http://www.theuspits.com/

* Spam is for losers who can't get business any other way *
"Spamkiller"    http://www.spamkiller.com

Tim

OT... What is 3DMark 2001???

by Tim » Sun, 18 Nov 2001 21:31:31


>Actually, I'm not against their CARDS, I'm against their way of doing
>business

[snip]

Aren't analogies supposed to be *simpler* than the actual situation?
;-)

Tim

Goy Larse

OT... What is 3DMark 2001???

by Goy Larse » Sun, 18 Nov 2001 21:41:00



> >Actually, I'm not against their CARDS, I'm against their way of doing
> >business

> [snip]

> Aren't analogies supposed to be *simpler* than the actual situation?
> ;-)

Yes....:-)

Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy

"The Pits"    http://www.theuspits.com/

* Spam is for losers who can't get business any other way *
"Spamkiller"    http://www.spamkiller.com

Dave Henri

OT... What is 3DMark 2001???

by Dave Henri » Sun, 18 Nov 2001 23:13:28

  3dmark2001 is aimed at DX8.  That is why, if you are more concerned about
current sims, the better benchmark would be 3dmark2000.
The problem still with benchmarks, is, I can tweek my system and almost
double my scores...but I don't use it at those settings.  So If I want to
trumpet how well my sytem works, I can choose a bunch of options in my vid
card properties that will definately speed things up...but the visual cost
means as soon as the test is over, I go back to my cleaner, better looking
and slower-benchmarking settings.  Which kinda defeats the purpose of a
benchmark......
dave henrie

Jens H. Kruus

OT... What is 3DMark 2001???

by Jens H. Kruus » Mon, 19 Nov 2001 01:06:12

I have always benchmarked my system (3DMark or ?) using the real settings
and apps. Eg. Virus scanner & firewall on. Seems silly to me to tweak for
unrealistic speed.

/Jens



STP

OT... What is 3DMark 2001???

by STP » Mon, 19 Nov 2001 02:20:42



I had the same thing happen to me on MS Train sim on a GF2. Not 32bit, but
at 1280x1024 it ran faster than at 1024x768. Goes against logic, but it
really was faster.

STP

OT... What is 3DMark 2001???

by STP » Mon, 19 Nov 2001 02:23:37



You run your games with virus scanner and firewall on? You shouldn't, waste
of resources. Get Enditall 2.0 and shut down all that stuff when running
games.

www.pcmag.com

Jacob Butne

OT... What is 3DMark 2001???

by Jacob Butne » Mon, 19 Nov 2001 02:32:08

LOL.. 605k?? Sheesh..  That would require some magic loading of devices in
config.sys :)

-Jacob

PS. The most trouble I had was playing Strike Commander in dos, think I had
to free up around 585 or 590k.. That was damn tricky..  Ahh the good ole
days of having specific boot disk for specific games.. LOL



> > I was saying for someone who builds computers for the public you don't
know
> > much!  =P   LOLOL

> > I've owned 3 nVidia cards since I last owned a 3dfx or other brand and I
> > have not had a single issue using them on Win98SE or Win2K Pro.  There
are
> > numerous drivers from which to choose... some approved, some not.. but
they
> > are there if you so choose.  All have worked flawlessly.

> Well, aren't you the lucky one, we build a couple of hundred systems
> every year and I'm the one who does most of the tech support.....

> "Hello, how may I help you"

> "Hey, we bought this computer just two weeks ago and "so and so" games
> won't run"

> "Ok, there's a new driver out from nVidia, have you tried installing
> that one"

> "What's a driver......"

> <sigh>

> "Ok, what you need to do is <insert appropriate explanation here>, see
> if that helps"

> "Ok thx"
> ---
> one hour later
> ---

> "Hi it's me again"

> "Sorry, who is this again"

> "Me with the PC problems"

> <sigh>

> "Ok, please remind me again, what problems were you having"

> "so and so games won't work and you told me to DL and install the latest
> driver and it didn't help"

> "Ok, what we're gonna do now is to try an install an older driver and
> see if that helps, if you come down to the shop I'll have them on a CD
> for you or you can DL them from this web site"

> etc etc, but with a bit of luck we'll soon find a driver which works for
> their PC, then they DL and run 3DMark or some other BM tool, and we get
> another phone call

> "Hey, that driver you told me to install slowed my PC by almost 10% in
> Q3, I can now only get 85 fps ......."

> <big sigh>

> I miss DOS, all we had to worry about then was Config.sys, Autoexec.bat,
> XMS, EMS, Smartdrive, Memmaker, conventional memory, mousedrivers and
> drivers for your soundcard and you were all set, unless you wanted to
> play "Aces over Europe" of course, in which case you needed at least
> 605k of conventional memory.........oh never mind

> Beers and cheers
> (uncle) Goy

> http://www.theuspits.com
> http://www.teammirage.com

> "A woman is an occasional pleasure but a cigar is always a smoke"
> --Groucho Marx--


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.