rec.autos.simulators

> Al

> > I guess I am one of those who can't help but bore the n.g. to death
> with
> > car physics.

> I admit I don't always have time to read through all those threads, but
> I certainly don't find them boring either. Keep it up.

> I guess I am one of those who can't help but bore the n.g. to death with
> car physics. What you suggest is actually happening, the knowledge is
> shared amongst people in this group, some people do some things, some
> people others, and we can compare, although coding itself is taking
> place independently. Anyone who ever programmed anything will tell you,
> though, that the longest part in coding is actually thinking of what to
> code and how to do it, and this 'how' is shared here.

>   This, IMHO, is even better than if only one project was out there, as
> then people would settle on one solution, implement it, and that's that.
> No comparison with other solutions would be possible. It will take time
> (these are mostly free time project), but something very good will
> eventually come out of these projects,.

> -Gregor

> > Lots of questions posted these days talk about car physics.
> > That let me think that some people are trying to develop their own sim.
> > But it must be a huge work....
> > Couldn't all these floks show up and merge their skills and free time
> > together to produce what could
> > be the best sim ever made.

> > Al

>I guess I am one of those who can't help but bore the n.g. to death with
>car physics. What you suggest is actually happening, the knowledge is
>shared amongst people in this group, some people do some things, some
>people others, and we can compare, although coding itself is taking
>place independently. Anyone who ever programmed anything will tell you,
>though, that the longest part in coding is actually thinking of what to
>code and how to do it, and this 'how' is shared here.