Can somebody help me with these problems or do I have to go back to W98?
My advice however is to stick with what works. If Win98 suits your needs and
Win2k doesnt work..."format c:" and go back to Win98. If you need Win2k for
some reason then i really dont know what to say.
Chris
"Concerning the difference between man and the jackass: some observers hold
that there isn't any. But this wrongs the jackass."--Mark Twain
> Well as with all Micorsoft products Windows 2k apparently has its compatibility
> issues. Personally im sticking with Win95 untill Win2k goes into final
> version. And then i still might stay with 95. Personally id like to see Linux
> take off and become the OS of choice but that seems unlikely. IBM had a
> Windows beater a few years ago with OS/2 Warp but unfortunately couldnt promote
> it well enough. Too bad the WinEmulator in there was for 3.1 and not 95 :( Oh
> well..such is life.
> My advice however is to stick with what works. If Win98 suits your needs and
> Win2k doesnt work..."format c:" and go back to Win98. If you need Win2k for
> some reason then i really dont know what to say.
He could setup a dual boot system though, not sure how easy this is when
you have Win2k installed first, but Win2k is perfectly happy being
installed on a machine with Win98 on it, and unlike WinNT40, it will
work with FAT32
Beers and cheers
(uncle) Goy
