rec.autos.simulators

by **Marty** » Mon, 11 Apr 2005 04:09:43

So let me get this straight. You actually think GW is running the show?

Marty

> Vice Presidents don't exactly rule, moron!

>>Which part - the one about kings or the one about the Bushes ruling
>>America for 20 of the last 28 years - granted, maths has never been my
>>forte so ... Bush snr as vice pre 1981-1989 - then president 1989-1993 -
>>Then George W as president 2001-2009 (or the end of the world, or his
>>third term when he changes the constitution, whichever comes first). So it
>>must be the king thing that you take issue with, which I suppose is fair -
>>but as I said in my reply, I had - and still have - no idea why someone
>>would be babbling about kings in 2005 ...

>>>>Well Plowboy, two things; one, I don't know what the hell you're talking
>>>>about - kings? - I think you'll find most of the planet outside the US
>>>>haven't had a king in a thousand years or more with any significant
>>>>power - unlike your nation, where the Bush clan has been in power for 20
>>>>of the last 28 years ...

>>>I agree with much of what you're saying, but the paragraph above is an
>>>asinine comment and completely destroys your credibility.

>>>Don McCorkle

by **Marty** » Mon, 11 Apr 2005 04:25:31

> All the activist have is "SEE, NO WMD SO NOTHING ELSE MATTERS". No WMD is
> such a typical and very sad politically motivated excuse for blinding
> yourself to everything good that has happened in Iraq. Do you realize this
> nonsense makes everything else you do look similarly marginal?

> So Iraq didnt have WMD at the time we invaded. Can you look me in the eyes
> and honestly tell me Saddam never had them? Yea, the Kirds being gassed was
> a right wing *** <rolls eyes>...

So, you're ok with the constant flow of body bags of American soldiers
coming back from Iraq because there used to be WMD's, having already
been distroyed by the UN weapons inspectors?

Pathetic.

Marty

by **Marty** » Mon, 11 Apr 2005 04:27:12

> OOOOOHHHHHHH My momma? Arent you a tough guy... you wont come by here
> welfare ***...

Huh? How old are you?

Pathetic

Marty

by **Marty** » Mon, 11 Apr 2005 04:36:49

>> Well Plowboy, two things; one, I don't know what the hell you're
>> talking about - kings? - I think you'll find most of the planet
>> outside the US haven't had a king in a thousand years or more with any
>> significant power - unlike your nation, where the Bush clan has been
>> in power for 20 of the last 28 years ...

> I agree with much of what you're saying, but the paragraph above is an
> asinine comment and completely destroys your credibility.

> Don McCorkle

What part of his comment is asinine...the reference to the greedy, ***
thirsty, corrupt rule of the Bush clan?

Marty

by **John Wallac** » Mon, 11 Apr 2005 16:15:09

>> So Iraq didnt have WMD at the time we invaded. Can you look me in the
>> eyes and honestly tell me Saddam never had them? Yea, the Kirds being
>> gassed was a right wing *** <rolls eyes>...

Mitch, do you know where the gas came from in those attacks? It was sold
to Hussain by a company located in Rockville, Maryland. The sale had
commerce department approval.

Come on, what did the US government think was going to happen when they
sold WMD to Hussain?! Once again, capitalism is the winner, and the
local people (the Kurds in this case are the losers).

Incidentally, were you aware that the Kurdish massacres were carried out
by the Republican Guards, spared by Schwarzkopf? Were you aware that US
aircraft circled cities in which massacres were taking place, but would
not help? Were you aware that British and US pilots have left their
respective air forces in protest at this policy of not supporting the Kurds?

Look up Arbil, look up Asiriyah - find out what US involvement was *on
the ground*, not what the news spins after the fact.

by **Woodie8** » Mon, 11 Apr 2005 21:46:06

>>> Well Plowboy, two things; one, I don't know what the hell you're
>>> talking about - kings? - I think you'll find most of the planet
>>> outside the US haven't had a king in a thousand years or more with
>>> any significant power - unlike your nation, where the Bush clan has
>>> been in power for 20 of the last 28 years ...
(SNIP)
> What part of his comment is asinine...the reference to the greedy, ***
> thirsty, corrupt rule of the Bush clan?

Excepting that we have recently learned he has too much power to start a
war for tenuous reasons, comparing the US Presidency to a King is
ridiculous. Also, the "Bush clan" has been in power for a total of nine
years.

Don McCorkle

by **Byron Forbe** » Wed, 13 Apr 2005 17:59:58

It is truely hilarious that someone who has nothing to do with themself
is *apparently* running a whole country. True of most *leaders*, just very
obvious that Bush has nothing to do with himself at all.

Note - By saying "nothing to do with himself" I mean he's controlled by
others, not that he's bored :)

by **Larr** » Wed, 13 Apr 2005 23:23:47

I guess my sarcasm escaped you :)

-Larry

rec.autos.simulators

Why does Bush go on vacation during war?

Why does Bush go on vacation during war?

Why does Bush go on vacation during war?

Why does Bush go on vacation during war?

Why does Bush go on vacation during war?

Why does Bush go on vacation during war?

Why does Bush go on vacation during war?

Why does Bush go on vacation during war?

Why does Bush go on vacation during war?