>Hi, I checked out the web page.
>Here's part of it, what does it mean?
>"EA SPORTS? presents NASCAR? Revolution, the first "raceable" PC racing
>simulation. A game where you race against other DRIVERS, not frustrating
>"flight simulator" conventions."
>I don't get it...
What don't you get? I good driving model can be as hairy to control as
a good flightmodel in a flightsim. It is obvious that EA Sports Nascar
Revolution, has a lightweight driving model, or human only opponents.
Some humans can be much worse than the computer AI :-) I think this
is just their justification for not having a great driving model in the
game.
It reminds me of MSI telling the flightsim NG that the reason Back to
Baghdad did not include wingmen and radio chatter was because
the next version would include multiplay; and humans would be much
better than any computer AI. While this might be true, MSI folded up
the Back to Baghdad tent and went back to doing industrial simulators.
So there will not be a next version and their excuses for lacking normal
features sucks as bad today as it did back then... As this new EA
game will suck no doubt :-)
--
Header address intentionally scrambled to ward off the spamming hordes.
cisko [AT] ix [DOT] netcom [DOT] com