> The author of this hot lap bragged with a lap time
> of
> 1.14.113. I tried to emulate this time and could only achieve 1.18.19,
> no
> matter
> how hard I tried. I then timed the so-called hot-lap with a stop-watch
> and
> measured it at 1.27.231. I then time my own hot-lap and found it to be
> 3
> tenths
> of a second faster. Seems to me someone has been cheating or what?
You cannot accurately check a gp2 hotlap using a stopwatch.
The *actual* time of a hotlap depends on the cpu occupancy of the pc
replaying the hotlap (eg:- yours)
The *actual* time will only match the *hotlap* time if your cpu occupancy
is at 100% for the whole hotlap (virtually impossible as the cpu occupancy
changes all the time depending on whats happening during the lap).
If the cpu occupancy is higher than 100% the *actual* time will be slower,
and if the cpu occupancy is lower than 100% the *actual* time will be
quicker.
This is due to the fact that the program rigidly displays the frame rates
set in the graphics screen, if your cpu cannot handle the graphics, the
game slows down, if you have a ninja pc, the game speeds up.
However, some of the times posted on the net are questionable? especially
bearing in mind the vast number of editors, patches, and utilities that
are available for *enhancing* gp2?
BTW, Personally my best at Interlagos, (using no editors, etc, and
using the keyboard) is 1:16:985
The best way to improve is to practice, practice, and practice......
d:~))
* Peter * 8-) Please remove asterix from address to email.