rec.autos.simulators

AMD K5 Processors

Graeme Nas

AMD K5 Processors

by Graeme Nas » Tue, 06 Oct 1998 04:00:00

Hi All,

Sorry to bother the technically minded again but I'm thinking of
upgrading my processor. I want to get an AMD K6 or K6/2 (preferably
around 333MHz).
Reading the documentation for my motherboard, it says that it supports
Pentium CPU's up to 200MHz.
But it is a socket 7 board (an i430VX) so can I run a K6? Or will it
frazzle my machine into oblivion?

Thanks!

--
Graeme Nash

You know what to do with "don't_spam_me"...
http://www.racesimcentral.net/
ICQ# 11257824

"My car appeared to disagree with my preference for living"

Graeme Nas

AMD K5 Processors

by Graeme Nas » Tue, 06 Oct 1998 04:00:00

Sorry....

--
Graeme Nash

You know what to do with "don't_spam_me"...
http://www.karisma1.demon.co.uk/
ICQ# 11257824

"My car appeared to disagree with my preference for living"

Pat Dotso

AMD K5 Processors

by Pat Dotso » Tue, 06 Oct 1998 04:00:00


> Sorry to bother the technically minded again but I'm thinking of
> upgrading my processor. I want to get an AMD K6 or K6/2 (preferably
> around 333MHz).
> Reading the documentation for my motherboard, it says that it supports
> Pentium CPU's up to 200MHz.
> But it is a socket 7 board (an i430VX) so can I run a K6? Or will it
> frazzle my machine into oblivion?

To run a K6, your motherboard has to support Pentium MMX cpu's.

The difference is in the voltage requirements.  A mobo that
only supports up to 200 mHz cpu's may be to old to support MMX.
K6-2's require an even newer voltage standard.

How do you intend to run a 333 mHz processor with a 200 mHz
mobo?

--
Pat Dotson
IMPACT Motorsports
http://www.impactmotorsports.com/pd.html

Graeme Nas

AMD K5 Processors

by Graeme Nas » Tue, 06 Oct 1998 04:00:00

Hi,

OK, I'll try to summarise. I'm not very good with technical Jargon,
y'see! BTW my primary choice now is an AMD K6-300MMX.

--
1)My m'board (an i430VX, bought May '97) runs my current CPU, an MMX
P200.

2)I'm pretty sure it runs at 3.3V.

3)The manual says - "Supports 75/90/100/...../180/200 MHz Pentium CPU's.
Although maybe anything beyond 200MHz wasn't invented then:)

4)It has a 321 pin ZIF socket.

5)I know for a fact that it doesn't support PII's, if that affects it at
all.

6)It supports AMD K5's, I know that much.

7)It supports up to 66MHz bus speed.

I'm really grateful for any help, as I can't afford a new machine just
yet and I would really like to improve my GPL experiences!

Cheers!

--
Graeme Nash

You know what to do with "don't_spam_me"...
http://www.karisma1.demon.co.uk/
ICQ# 11257824

"My car appeared to disagree with my preference for living"

Pat Dotso

AMD K5 Processors

by Pat Dotso » Tue, 06 Oct 1998 04:00:00


> Hi,

> >To run a K6, your motherboard has to support Pentium MMX cpu's.

> >The difference is in the voltage requirements.  A mobo that
> >only supports up to 200 mHz cpu's may be to old to support MMX.
> >K6-2's require an even newer voltage standard.

> >How do you intend to run a 333 mHz processor with a 200 mHz
> >mobo?
> OK, I'll try to summarise. I'm not very good with technical Jargon,
> y'see! BTW my primary choice now is an AMD K6-300MMX.

I'm in almost the same situation as you.  I have a K6-166 oc'd to
208 (83 mHz bus).  It runs at about the speed of a normal P5-233.
Combined with a V1000 video card, I can hotlap all day at 30+
fps with most details on.  I can race with about 8 AI cars with
most details off, and still get around 30 fps outside of traffic.

If it supports a P5-MMX, it has the split-voltage support that
a regular K6 needs.

And you won't be able to run any cpu at greater than 200 MHz.
To run a K6-300 at 300 will require a new mobo.

Based on what you have said, you will have to get a new
motherboard to go with any new cpu you buy - whether it's
a K6, K6-2 or a P2, so maybe you should consider a P2?

The cheapest way to go is probably to get a cheap super
socket 7 board, with a K6-2 300.  By mail order, that should
be around $200 or less.

--
Pat Dotson
IMPACT Motorsports
http://www.impactmotorsports.com/pd.html

DnKe

AMD K5 Processors

by DnKe » Tue, 06 Oct 1998 04:00:00

To run a K6-2 the bus speed needs to be 100 MHZ, not 66. Your board's bus speed
is too slow to  a K2.

Pentium I chips normally use a BabyAT size board,. They need a  66MHZ bus speed
board, and must have a SOCKET  7 CPU socket.

A Pentium II normally use an ATX size board ), SLOT-1 CPU socket, and 66 or 100
MHZ bus, depending on WHICH SPEED of PII it  is.

A Intel Celeron needs SLOT1 and  66MHZ bus is fast enough. They do come in Baby
AT size or ATX.

A K6-2 needs SOCKET7 and 100MHZ, The good news is that K6-2 boards usually come
in Baby AT size (ATX size also available) so the new MB's designed for the K6-2
 at your  local dealer are the right size.

The slang name for a SOCKET 7 board that runs at speeds up to 100MHZ and is
designed for K6-2 chips is 'SUPER SOCKET 7" board.  They sell like hotcakes now
for about $100. All local dealers will have them.  The actual CPU, a K6-2 will
cost about $230 and may or may not take the old style EDO RAM.

Daniel Lichtenberg

AMD K5 Processors

by Daniel Lichtenberg » Wed, 07 Oct 1998 04:00:00

On Mon, 5 Oct 1998 20:03:39 +0100, Graeme Nash


>Hi,

>>To run a K6, your motherboard has to support Pentium MMX cpu's.
>--
>1)My m'board (an i430VX, bought May '97) runs my current CPU, an MMX
>P200.

>2)I'm pretty sure it runs at 3.3V.

The CPU core runs at 2.9V (the CPU would blow up otherwise, so that's
pretty sure:-)

Very likely.

Correct.

Um, that could be a real problem. AFAIK you need a 100 MHz system to
run the K6/2 at 300 MHz. I think you'll need a new motherboard - but
then you could also buy a cheap Slot1 MB and a Celeron A with 300 or
333 MHz which should give you better performance of GPL as this
doesn't support 3DNow!.

CU
Daniel
--
    Daniel Lichtenberger, Vienna/Austria

Scott Rixo

AMD K5 Processors

by Scott Rixo » Wed, 07 Oct 1998 04:00:00

Why by a Celeron to go on an expensive Slot 1 board?? Would a cheaper AMD K-2
with at 100 MHz board and 512k L2 cache not be a cheaper and better option???

Has the Celeron been proven to be faster??? I thought they had hardly any
cache, the early ones didn't have any!!

Just my thoughts, any one out there with an AMD K-2?? What frame rates are
you getting??? Do we really want to give Intel more money to make pretty
adverts????

Scott

Pete

AMD K5 Processors

by Pete » Fri, 09 Oct 1998 04:00:00


> Why by a Celeron to go on an expensive Slot 1 board?? Would a cheaper AMD K-2
> with at 100 MHz board and 512k L2 cache not be a cheaper and better option???

> Has the Celeron been proven to be faster??? I thought they had hardly any
> cache, the early ones didn't have any!!

> Just my thoughts, any one out there with an AMD K-2?? What frame rates are
> you getting??? Do we really want to give Intel more money to make pretty
> adverts????

> Scott

> > Um, that could be a real problem. AFAIK you need a 100 MHz system to
> > run the K6/2 at 300 MHz. I think you'll need a new motherboard - but
> > then you could also buy a cheap Slot1 MB and a Celeron A with 300 or
> > 333 MHz which should give you better performance of GPL as this
> > doesn't support 3DNow!.

> > >I'm really grateful for any help, as I can't afford a new machine just
> > >yet and I would really like to improve my GPL experiences!

> > >Cheers!

> > CU
> > Daniel
> > --
> >     Daniel Lichtenberger, Vienna/Austria

It is perfectly possible to put a 300MHz Celeron A (w 128K L2 cache) in
a decent 100MHz FSB capable board and with a bit of gigery-pokery
overclock it to 450MHz.  At this speed it will outrun a genuine PII-450
since the celeron cache runs at processor speed as opposed to the PII's
half speed cache.

Check out http://www.tomshardware.com for details


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.