rec.autos.simulators

Car Physics - Tire Side Bite

Pat Dots

Car Physics - Tire Side Bite

by Pat Dots » Sun, 02 Mar 2003 04:11:35

I'm trying to understand two concepts that seem to oppose each other.
First is the idea that max grip is available when the load of the
vehicle is balanced between the right and left side tires.  Second is
the idea of tire "side bite".

I never heard the term "side bite" in all my years of sim racing.
When I started racing oval karts, I found that this is a big topic of
discussion.  I have also heard it used in other forms of car racing.
Side bite is essentially the amount of lateral force the tire can
provide.  This lateral force generally increases as the tire becomes
more compliant to the road.  Side bite is generally increased by
raising the load on a tire, or reducing air pressure in the tire.  So,
the key seems to be the amount that the sidewall of the tire flexes.

When I started racing karts, and thinking about setups, I could see
that while cornering standard oval karts often transfer 90% or more of
the total weight of the kart onto the right tires.  I thought I was
going to gain a big advantage by running more left side weight bias,
and getting a better balance between the left side and right side
tires in a corner, thereby increasing grip.  But it doesn't really
work that way.  What I found out is that the more weight you get on
the right side tires, the more "side bite" you get, and the more grip
the kart develops.

I have experienced this increase in grip myself.  What surprised me is
that you can have too much grip, and the kart will be slow.  What you
want is a balance that provides enough side bite to get through the
corner, without getting so much bite that you "bind" the kart (which
is another term that I had never heard).

So, how does the idea of side bite reconcile with the idea of max grip
occuring when balancing the loads on the left and right side?

My only theory is that, if you can balance the load more evenly, that
you could run a softer tire compound on the right side.  By doing so
you could maintain the amount of grip generated on the right side, and
increase grip on the left side.  I don't know if this would end up
binding the kart up or not.

In my only experience of testing this theory, I was running more left
side weight than normal for karts, and ran a softer right side tire
compound than anyone else in the race.  I had a big advantage at the
start.  Starting on the pole, I ran off and hid during the first half
of the race.  Toward the end, one guy caught me, but wasn't able to
pass.  My tires didn't go away since my lap times weren't going up, he
just got faster toward the end.

I must be really bored!  Racing won't start again here in Indiana for
at least another month.  :)  Anyway, I'd appreciate any other ideas on
this subject.

Aaron Markha

Car Physics - Tire Side Bite

by Aaron Markha » Sun, 02 Mar 2003 04:53:04

Left side weight is good when turning left, but you have to let the LR tire
lift in the center of the corner to unload the kart. Then it has to sit back
down on exit to get "forward bite". Another key thing in oval kart racing is
air pressure. If you start too high then you come in too quick and fade at
the end. Where as starting lower allows you to come in later. I run dirt
down in Va, and NC and I'm assuming you run asphalt. I know on a rock hard
track that is black as asphalt with *** build up, we run the hardest damn
Maxxis tires we can find (60+ on durometer) with only about 1/32 of ***
on the tire. In qualifying we up the air pressure to get the kart up to
speed quicker "less tire flex, like a stiff shock" and it makes it come in
much sooner since we only run 4 laps in qualifying. We reduce the pressure
in the race, so we can last for 20 laps. Been working for me, ran very good
this past year. I won a VDKA state race, and had several top 5 finishes in
money races this winter.

The big learning curve I had this past year was caster/camber. It has gotten
very big in dirt oval karts, and helps a ton in maintaining corner speed.
There are a lot of people running high amounts of camber in the RF tire now
a days.

---------------------------------------------
Thanks,
Aaron Markham

RATE MY CAR AT CARDOMAIN.COM!
http://www.racesimcentral.net/

*RIP Ayrton Senna & Dale Earnhardt*

Haqsa

Car Physics - Tire Side Bite

by Haqsa » Sun, 02 Mar 2003 09:52:38

I have seen a number of posts here about kart physics from you and a couple
of other guys which make me think that kart tires just plain don't work like
full size racing tires.  Are there differences in the construction?  Are
kart tires bias ply or radial?  Do they run inner tubes?  Something has just
got to be a lot different.


WillyB41

Car Physics - Tire Side Bite

by WillyB41 » Sun, 02 Mar 2003 09:52:50

I don't think they oppose each other. I think it's different with a kart
because they are so light. You can't get enough weight on the tire unless you
"unbalance" it to favor the side you want to have traction.

The binding is partially because of the solid rear axle and the small
circumference tires. That's another reason to lighten up the inside tire almost
to the point of "bicycling" it.

Bill Berry

Paul Laidla

Car Physics - Tire Side Bite

by Paul Laidla » Sun, 02 Mar 2003 11:53:24


> I have seen a number of posts here about kart physics from you and a couple
> of other guys which make me think that kart tires just plain don't work like
> full size racing tires.  Are there differences in the construction?  Are
> kart tires bias ply or radial?  Do they run inner tubes?  Something has just
> got to be a lot different.

Karts are different in that they have no diff, when people say a kart is binding
they mean they have both rear wheels on the ground and they are 'fighting' each
other, they want to run at a different speed and this reduces rear grip.
I thought oval karts used stagger to reduce this but we don't use ovals
this side of the pond. If you try pushing a kart in a straight line and then
round a corner you will find that this binding does make a difference!

Without stagger at least, the idea is to lift the inside rear wheel when
cornering at the limit as this gives more grip, with the correct amount
of stagger or a diff this shouldn't be the case. It is critical to get wheel
lift setup correctly as you also need both wheels on the ground for
maximum traxction out of corners. If you look closely you will see
some drivers lean outwards through some corners to lift the inside
rear.

I don't really know much about oval racing however.

    Paul

Carl Ribbegaard

Car Physics - Tire Side Bite

by Carl Ribbegaard » Mon, 03 Mar 2003 01:22:16

Thanks for the excellent explanation! :-)
Pat Dotso

Car Physics - Tire Side Bite

by Pat Dotso » Mon, 03 Mar 2003 02:43:36


> I have seen a number of posts here about kart physics from you and a couple
> of other guys which make me think that kart tires just plain don't work like
> full size racing tires.  Are there differences in the construction?  Are
> kart tires bias ply or radial?  Do they run inner tubes?  Something has just
> got to be a lot different.

They are bias ply with no innertube.

One idea is that you have to get more weight on the right side tires to
get heat into them.

PD

Pat Dotso

Car Physics - Tire Side Bite

by Pat Dotso » Mon, 03 Mar 2003 02:50:55


> I don't think they oppose each other. I think it's different with a kart
> because they are so light. You can't get enough weight on the tire unless you
> "unbalance" it to favor the side you want to have traction.

You may be right about how light they are.  I've heard people say that
before, but in reading car dynamics books, the tire grip v. vertical
load curves seem to be linear from zero force up to the limit of the
tire.  So it doesn't seem like the light weight of a kart should matter.

Small circumference.  Could you go further into why that makes a
difference.  Unloading the LR tire to the point of lifting is sort of a
standard part of current oval kart setup theory, but with the right
amount of stagger, I can't see why the inside tire should have to lift.
  Obviously, with a sprint kart and no stagger, lifting the inside rear
makes complete sense.

Thanks,
PD

Pat Dotso

Car Physics - Tire Side Bite

by Pat Dotso » Mon, 03 Mar 2003 03:13:18


> Karts are different in that they have no diff, when people say a kart is binding
> they mean they have both rear wheels on the ground and they are 'fighting' each
> other, they want to run at a different speed and this reduces rear grip.
> I thought oval karts used stagger to reduce this...

Exactly.  With the right amount of stagger, the inside rear doesn't
really have to lift IMO.

I understand what you are talking as far as binding the kart if the
stagger doesn't match the turn.  But I have also heard people refer to
having too much side bite as binding.  It's probably more properly
referred to as being "tight".  The car has enough grip to drive it
anywhere you want.  It's very easy to drive, but it's slow.

Yes, ovals are different.

Thanks,
PD

Paul Laidla

Car Physics - Tire Side Bite

by Paul Laidla » Mon, 03 Mar 2003 04:01:53

You must be reading different car dynamics books than me! Tyres do
not produce double the grip for double the vertical load, hence the overall
weight and weight transfer does (or should) matter.
I suspect it is simply hard to get the correct amount of stagger.
Do the ovals you race at have constant radius corners and are all corners
identical?

I imagine small circumference and tight corners simply means you need
lots of stagger, ie the wheels need to run at a greater percentage speed
difference than if you used larger diameter wheels (like on a car).

Now I think about it I was also under the impression that people use offset
seats on oval karts to transfer weight to the inside?

There is (or was last time I looked) some good setup advice
at www.ekartingnews.com in the forums. You'll have to have
a look through to find the good posts though.

    Paul

WillyB41

Car Physics - Tire Side Bite

by WillyB41 » Mon, 03 Mar 2003 07:04:30

There is another reason for lifting the inside tire. IIRC, we used to raise the
RF spindle so when you turned left, the weight transferred to the right front
tire like a teeter-totter effect lifting the LR in the process. This dug in the
RF and really made the kart turn hard. We tried to run zero stagger because
even the smallest amount killed the top speed. This was in a stock medium 5HP.

As far as the seat being offset, it has to be for clearance with the engine.
The driver sits right next to it. One other thing I learned was that the weight
of your head and helmet could help you corner. When going into the turn I'd
lean out a little and let my head roll as if I were looking around a corner. It
actually did make a difference.

Bill Berry

DAVID J ROBINSO

Car Physics - Tire Side Bite

by DAVID J ROBINSO » Mon, 03 Mar 2003 12:31:14


Lifting of the inside rear tire on a kart is pretty standard. It is called a
jacking effect and happens in both oval and sprint karting.  I always
thought it was a simple way to get a kart to turn without having to deal
with the effects of not having a diff in the kart.

Dave

bengal2

Car Physics - Tire Side Bite

by bengal2 » Tue, 04 Mar 2003 01:54:35

I race road courses up here in Saskatchewan, Canada. I use an american
built Coyote chassis and find that the physics of the kart and tires can
be drastically different than the same tyres on a European chassis.
This is because chassis flex is very important for grip.
A stiff sidewall on my chassis gives me more grip on the front and
turning in. A softer compound tire gives me less grip probably because
the sidewall flexes too much...go figure.
As far as unloading the rear, When the kart is turning left, the LF tire
bites first and lifts the left front corner of the Kart.With a proper
setup, this will transfer weight to the right rear because of the way
the chassis flexes thereby unloading the left rear tire to allow the
kart to floww through the corner. If the setup in the rear is to narrow
this can result in "bicycling" which means the LR lifts too high and in
some cases the kart can flip over . Happened to me once ehhe

http://members.shaw.ca/wjen/wjen/index.htm

Bengal


> I'm trying to understand two concepts that seem to oppose each other.
> First is the idea that max grip is available when the load of the
> vehicle is balanced between the right and left side tires.  Second is
> the idea of tire "side bite".

> I never heard the term "side bite" in all my years of sim racing.
> When I started racing oval karts, I found that this is a big topic of
> discussion.  I have also heard it used in other forms of car racing.
> Side bite is essentially the amount of lateral force the tire can
> provide.  This lateral force generally increases as the tire becomes
> more compliant to the road.  Side bite is generally increased by
> raising the load on a tire, or reducing air pressure in the tire.  So,
> the key seems to be the amount that the sidewall of the tire flexes.

> When I started racing karts, and thinking about setups, I could see
> that while cornering standard oval karts often transfer 90% or more of
> the total weight of the kart onto the right tires.  I thought I was
> going to gain a big advantage by running more left side weight bias,
> and getting a better balance between the left side and right side
> tires in a corner, thereby increasing grip.  But it doesn't really
> work that way.  What I found out is that the more weight you get on
> the right side tires, the more "side bite" you get, and the more grip
> the kart develops.

> I have experienced this increase in grip myself.  What surprised me is
> that you can have too much grip, and the kart will be slow.  What you
> want is a balance that provides enough side bite to get through the
> corner, without getting so much bite that you "bind" the kart (which
> is another term that I had never heard).

> So, how does the idea of side bite reconcile with the idea of max grip
> occuring when balancing the loads on the left and right side?

> My only theory is that, if you can balance the load more evenly, that
> you could run a softer tire compound on the right side.  By doing so
> you could maintain the amount of grip generated on the right side, and
> increase grip on the left side.  I don't know if this would end up
> binding the kart up or not.

> In my only experience of testing this theory, I was running more left
> side weight than normal for karts, and ran a softer right side tire
> compound than anyone else in the race.  I had a big advantage at the
> start.  Starting on the pole, I ran off and hid during the first half
> of the race.  Toward the end, one guy caught me, but wasn't able to
> pass.  My tires didn't go away since my lap times weren't going up, he
> just got faster toward the end.

> I must be really bored!  Racing won't start again here in Indiana for
> at least another month.  :)  Anyway, I'd appreciate any other ideas on
> this subject.

WillyB41

Car Physics - Tire Side Bite

by WillyB41 » Tue, 04 Mar 2003 07:03:28

Don't you mean the RF bites first??

Bill Berry


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.