Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive
Hardware / Graphics cards

3dfx Voodoo Rush

discussed in 196 posts, 1996-2002 · overall tone negative

Posts per month

1 posts1997: 1 posts19971 posts3 posts0 posts1 posts2 posts1 posts1 posts13 posts10 posts20 posts17 posts1998: 17 posts199813 posts7 posts17 posts3 posts6 posts0 posts7 posts4 posts18 posts2 posts2 posts1999: 0 posts19999 posts9 posts0 posts0 posts0 posts0 posts0 posts1 posts1 posts1 posts0 posts2000: 0 posts20003 posts1 posts0 posts1 posts0 posts0 posts0 posts0 posts0 posts0 posts0 posts2001: 0 posts20010 posts0 posts0 posts0 posts0 posts0 posts0 posts0 posts0 posts0 posts0 posts2002: 2 posts20020 posts0 posts0 posts0 posts0 posts0 posts0 posts1 posts

Key threads

  • Improving frame rates in NASCAR Racing 1999 Edition 1999-02-25 · 21 posts
    A user with a P233 MMX and a Voodoo Rush card could not get smooth frame rates in NASCAR Racing 1999 Edition. Advice included replacing the Rush card with a Rendition V2200 or Banshee, cutting the number of cars drawn, and checking frame rate through detail-switching settings. Posters disagreed on whether 3dfx mode was slower than software rendering.
  • PowerVR or 3Dfx card for racing games? 1997-11-05 · 30 posts
    A user asked whether to buy a Matrox m3D (PowerVR) or a 3Dfx card. Most recommended 3Dfx because new racing sims supported Glide, while Randy Magruder and Eric Busch argued that Rendition V2x00 and Riva 128 cards matched it under Direct3D. The thread became a heated argument over benchmarks and standards.
  • Grand Prix Legends demo performance problems 1998-04-06 · 20 posts
    A user found the GPL demo unusable in software mode and could not run 3Dfx mode with a Voodoo Rush card. Others pointed out the readme said Voodoo Rush was unsupported and reported smooth frame rates on Voodoo and Rendition cards, noting L2 cache and RAM mattered.
  • Papa Doc's Voodoo5 vs GeForce3 benchmarks spark long argument 2002-01-14 · 311 posts
    Pierre "Papa Doc" Legrand published benchmarks comparing a Voodoo5 and a GeForce3 in Ghost Recon, NASCAR 4, Quake 3 and flight sims, finding the Voodoo5 competitive with 4x FSAA. Many disputed his methodology, including running 3DMark without hardware T&L, and argued the GeForce3 was better in every way. The thread ran to over 300 posts and degenerated into insults, ending up on multi-monitor and LCD resolution arguments.
  • Choosing a 3D card for F1RS 1998-02-24 · 26 posts
    A buyer asked whether a cheap Virge card would do for F1 Racing Simulation, and most said to get a 3Dfx Voodoo. Randy Magruder detailed differences between the Direct3D and Glide versions after patch 1.07. The thread covered accelerator sensitivity settings and Glide gamma at high refresh rates.
  • Setting up F1 2002 for the GTR 2002 mod 2002-09-19 · 25 posts
    MadDAWG bought F1 2002 to try the GTR 2002 mod and asked about setup and patches. Damien Smith recommended unofficial car model, rim and AI updates, and Steve Blankenship shared his driving-aid settings, revealing that MadDAWG had been running reduced physics. The discussion then covered whether CPU or graphics card mattered more for frame rates.
  • Reaction to NASCAR 4 dropping specific 3dfx Glide support 2000-05-09 · 94 posts
    News that NASCAR Racing 4 would use only Direct3D and OpenGL upset owners of Voodoo cards bought for GPL and NASCAR 3. Some criticised Papyrus for repeatedly switching graphics APIs, from Rendition to Glide and A3D, while others said Glide was dying and D3D was the sensible choice. Side debates covered whether 32-bit color mattered and why GPL's OpenGL rasteriser was so slow.
  • Why GPL dominates the newsgroup 2000-03-23 · 82 posts
    David Karr opened a discussion on whether GPL fans had hijacked the newsgroup and dismissed other sims. Many replied that GPL dominated simply because nothing had matched its immersion, physics and online racing. David G Fisher argued that GPL fans were boorish and demanded quotes from real F1 drivers praising it.

Sentiment by year

Each post that discussed it was rated from −2 (very negative) to +2 (very positive).

YearPostsPositiveNegativeTone
1996100mixed (+0.00)
199770623negative (-0.29)
199896945negative (-0.43)
199921011very negative (-0.67)
2000503very negative (-0.80)
2002302very negative (-1.00)

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy