rec.autos.simulators

The ME! ME! ME! Syndrome

robswindell

The ME! ME! ME! Syndrome

by robswindell » Thu, 23 Sep 1999 04:00:00

Mmm, yes. I rather liked all that :o) Thanks, Bob. I'm going to get N3 and
enjoy it...


> I've noticed a phenomenon on R.A.S...etc. etc...
> "If God had intended men to join the Army he would have given us green,
> baggy skin"

--
Rob Swindells
3rd equal in Goldline Bearings FFord Championship (29 Points);
ONE point behind Championship Leader (as of round 5 of 6)
"If you're a great driver, you will get through. It's not harder than any
time before." ~Martin Brundle
"Winning, that you can't know, 'fighting' ...that I know..." ~Jacques
Villeneuve pre'96
Thom j

The ME! ME! ME! Syndrome

by Thom j » Thu, 23 Sep 1999 04:00:00

Bob Curtain made some valid points {a bit too 4 letter'ish} but {yes there
is a but} is this the beginning of "FACT or OPINION Infomercial 101"??
Just curious.. "O" I prefer "Subjective Opinion" not that it'll get you a
free
cup of "Jo" anywhere. Anyway Keep Smilin' Folks It Won't Hurt Ya.;0)
Cheers Thom_j.


> Mmm, yes. I rather liked all that :o) Thanks, Bob. I'm going to get N3 and
> enjoy it...


> > I've noticed a phenomenon on R.A.S...etc. etc...
> > "If God had intended men to join the Army he would have given us green,
> > baggy skin"

> --
> Rob Swindells
> 3rd equal in Goldline Bearings FFord Championship (29 Points);
> ONE point behind Championship Leader (as of round 5 of 6)
> "If you're a great driver, you will get through. It's not harder than any
> time before." ~Martin Brundle
> "Winning, that you can't know, 'fighting' ...that I know..." ~Jacques
> Villeneuve pre'96

Jeff Jone

The ME! ME! ME! Syndrome

by Jeff Jone » Thu, 23 Sep 1999 04:00:00

Well said, Bob.

I just said myself recently that r.a.s. is one of the only places in the
world that N3 could get a beating for not being realistic enough.

jeff

Doug

The ME! ME! ME! Syndrome

by Doug » Thu, 23 Sep 1999 04:00:00

Hey Bob,
Interesting posting.  But the truth is.. if you bought NASCAR 3 and NO ONE
ELSE bought it.  You would be able to play it online and we would not.  That
is not fair of Papyrus!!!  It is an upgrade... (Upgrade: defined as having
the same original code base) and yet they expect the consumer to pay 50
dollars for it.  Is it worth it at that price?! HELL NO!  But you bought
it.. why? because you don't have a choice like the rest of us.  Papyrus
chose to keep the same engine.. .why? Probably because Sierra is falling
apart at the seams (when's the last time any has seen a new Leisure Suit
Larry Game? or King's Quest game?).
Papy created a product that is clearly an upgrade.. not a new product, just
an upgrade of their previous product.  Then.. they make it so that if I
refuse to buy Nascar 3... and my friend does buy Nascar 3... can you play
Nascar 99 against Nascar 3 online?!?!  NO!!!!  That is BS!
You try to make valid points that the consumer has a choice... well.. hate
to tell ya but.  The consumer does NOT have a choice, they are given
ultimatims.. not choices.  What would happen if you have Windows 95.. and
Windows 98 comes out and suddenly you are forced to buy Windows 98 because
nothing works with Windows 95 anymore?  That's what happened with Nascar 99
& 3.. suddenly everyone has to redo their tracks, cars, setups, etc...
Papyrus didn't HAVE to do this.. they CHOSE to make it this way to FORCE
SALES UPON THE CONSUMER!!!
Bob, I'm not cutting you down, by I work in the software development
industry and that's the way the cookie crumbles.  Papyrus cheated alot of
consumers for the all mighty buck. Quit defending Papyrus... ever since they
started with Sierra, they have been manipulated into making inferior
products.  I'm sure they have the talent to create products better than they
have.  Do I have to mention how much SODA Off Road Racing sucks?!
Considering Papyrus has only ONE GAME they work on.. NASCAR, you would think
they would be having alot better products than they are offering.
That B.S. about Papyrus creating NASCAR 2000 with the GPL engine, and then
stating that computers couldn't handle it?! THAT'S B.S.!!!!!!  If computers
of today couldn't handle it.. how in the hell did they make it?? Does
Papyrus only use Kryotech 1 GHz computers with 2GB of 1ns RAM?!?!  Why in
the hell would they spend time and money creating a product... and then put
our an anouncement saying it's better than the computers can handle.  Gee...
"we are such GREAT programmers that we created something that won't run fast
enough on your computer"... TRANSLATION: "We suck soooo bad that we can't
write code good enough to run on anything, so rather than figuring out how
to write better code, we'll just wait a year for a better computer"

I bought NASCAR 3, only because my friend was going to buy it... I didn't
really want to, but I HAD NO CHOICE if I want to continue racing Nascar
against him. It is possible to allow Nascar 3 owners to race against Nascar
99 owners, Papyrus just didn't want to work 'too hard'.

ARGH!! I hate defenders of computer games!!

Tim (fusio

The ME! ME! ME! Syndrome

by Tim (fusio » Fri, 24 Sep 1999 04:00:00

[snip]

Oh, you so TOTALLY lost me right there, and also shot your credibility
right in the ass to boot.

Until Viper and GPL came out, SODA was the most realistic PC vehicle
simulator out. It did most of the things GPL did 2 years before, when
a high spec box was a Pentium 200, and the average was a 133.
If you're saying it sucked because it was too hard for you (not
uncommon, just like GPL) that's one thing, but it definitely didn't
suck.
You might have also forgot that it was sort of a sub-contracted game.
Software Allies made it, Papyrus labeled it, and Sierra published it.
It wasn't an in-house Papyrus product.
The worst thing about SODA was the poor 3D support. Rendition only, at
a time when the Voodoo 1 was the hottest thing going.
A 3Dfx patch was promised, but Sierra ix-nayed it before completion.
I hated them for it. I would jump at another Papyrus off-road sim.

This rationale is so wacky, I hardly know where to begin.
First and foremost, they have to design for the typical machine in the
home. You think thats the P3-500 with 256 meg of RAM and latest 3D
card which they're using for development?
No, it's probably a P2/266 with some bullshit original 4 meg Riva
card, or a $1000 K6/2 300 from Best Buy with God-knows-what kind of
video built onto a half-ass motherboard.

They COULD make N3 with the GPL engine work on their development
boxes.  They're pro's, and a pro anything, from a landscaper, to a
mechanic, to a programmer uses the BEST equipment they can get for
their field.

N3 with the GPL engine would probably work pretty damn well on most of
the PC's of the people reading this newsgroup (at least if they were
willing to settle for 25 cars instead of 43, which would be fine with
me). That's not the target they had to hit though.

You say you're in the software industry, but you don't grasp that?
Are you a cashier at EB?

Tim

Kevin Caldwel

The ME! ME! ME! Syndrome

by Kevin Caldwel » Fri, 24 Sep 1999 04:00:00

Bob,

Newsgroups are newsgroups! I read 2% of it and ignore the rest because I
know it's not worth my time.

Maybe Papyrus needs to adopt a different marketing strategy. Rather than
getting complaints from the masses that the "game" is too difficult, they
should direct market the real sims off the web. If they charged $150US for
GPL, I still would have thought I got a deal. Avoid all of Sierra's mass
marketing connections, and their slice of the profits, and maybe there is
money in high end racing simulations. I think X-plane goes for about that,
and they seem to be staying around.

We've got a bunch of fairly serious sim racers, most who have spent $200 to
$2000 on a controller, probably another grand on computer upgrades, and the
software that makes this all worth it is $40US? That doesn't seem right to
me.

I think all companies that go the hard route of following their passion,
rather than the dollars, struggle financially from time to time. Certainly
Ferrari has, and Lotus and Apple, and the thousands of other small business
that do it, at least in good measure, because they love it. They will likely
never rule the world like GM or Microsoft, but that was never their goal.

Kevin

Wishing I had the courage to follow mine...


Bruce Kennewel

The ME! ME! ME! Syndrome

by Bruce Kennewel » Fri, 24 Sep 1999 04:00:00

When one has experienced the realism of a one year-old Papyrus product and
the realism of a brand-new product is of a lower order then one is bound for
disappointment.

It would be interesting to have seen how many people would have bought N3 if
Papyrus had made a demo available a month ago.

BK


  -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
   http://www.newsfeeds.com       The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
------== Over 73,000 Newsgroups - Including  Dedicated  Binaries Servers ==-----


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.