rec.autos.simulators

Celeron II-566 @850mhz vs. PIII-600 @850mhz, any performance difference in GP3?

f13df

Celeron II-566 @850mhz vs. PIII-600 @850mhz, any performance difference in GP3?

by f13df » Tue, 01 Aug 2000 04:00:00

Would there be a NOTICEABLE performance difference using either one in GP3?
Tim McArthu

Celeron II-566 @850mhz vs. PIII-600 @850mhz, any performance difference in GP3?

by Tim McArthu » Tue, 01 Aug 2000 04:00:00


than any coppermine at the same mhz. (not dis'ing celerys, just a fact).
Since GP3 isnt all that CPU intensive, I doubt you would see much of a
difference as long as you have a good 3D card.


Bill Jone

Celeron II-566 @850mhz vs. PIII-600 @850mhz, any performance difference in GP3?

by Bill Jone » Wed, 02 Aug 2000 04:00:00



> than any coppermine at the same mhz. (not dis'ing celerys, just a fact).
> Since GP3 isnt all that CPU intensive, I doubt you would see much of a
> difference as long as you have a good 3D card.

The ScreenSavers show on ZDTV last week claimed that a 566MHz Celeron is 48%
slower than a PIII 600.
http://www.zdtv.com/zdtv/screensavers/showtell/jump/0,3658,1501,00.html

--
<remove 7of9 for e-mail replies>

--
Bill Jones    e-mail addresses:


(860) 701-1201   WWW:   http://pages.cthome.net/billj



> > Would there be a NOTICEABLE performance difference using either one in
> GP3?

Peter Hol

Celeron II-566 @850mhz vs. PIII-600 @850mhz, any performance difference in GP3?

by Peter Hol » Thu, 03 Aug 2000 04:00:00

Check out this link for a Pentium 3 v o/c'd Celeron 2 test.

http://firingsquad.gamers.com/hardware/p3vc2/default.asp


>Would there be a NOTICEABLE performance difference using either one in GP3?


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.