>Fraud is:
>1. The intentional misrepresentation of a material fact.
>2. Made for the purpose of a specific person relying on it.
>3. That specific person did, in fact rely on it.
>4. By relying on it, that specific person suffered a loss.
>These four elements must be present to prove fraud "in the U.S.".
>Bill Yowell
>(Remco
>> Moedt) writes:
>> >>Technically, Jack IS a liar. He said that GPal would be out on a certain
>> >date.
>> >> It wasn't. That makes him a liar.
>> >Nope. You're a liar if you KNOW that what you say isn't true. In
>> >Jack's case, you can't prove it...
>> >> A fraud is someone who promises something
>> >>they can't (or won't) deliver. Again, that description DOES fit Jack.
>> >Nope again. A fraud is someone who is doing it on purpose. Again, you
>> >can't prove this in Jack's case...
>> >Remco
>> Uh, you can be sued for fraud(in the US anyway) if you don't deliver what
>you
>> promised. Whether it's on purpose or not doesn't matter. We'll just have
>to
>> agree to disagree on this. I see Andre's comments as a running joke we have
>> aroung here...
>> Eldred
don't have a problem with how Jack handled this, some(including myself) do.
Shit happens - put away your 'law' books...
Eldred
--
Tiger Stadium R.I.P. 1912-1999
Own Grand Prix Legends? Goto http://www.racesimcentral.net/
Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you
with experience...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.