rec.autos.simulators

F1 and rally simm recommendations?

Mikko Harjul

F1 and rally simm recommendations?

by Mikko Harjul » Wed, 16 Sep 1998 04:00:00

I'm an enthusiastic flight simmer and have always considered myself as
non-arcade gamer in fsims, but after reading this ng I'm not sure the
same goes in car simms.  I'm really not that much interested tuning
suspension or wings - i'd rather be driving.  However I would like
some realism, f.ex. I don't want a game where after a collision the
car continues as nothing has happened.

In this respect what F1 and rally sims would you recomment?  F1RS
seems to be highly regarded but is there a way for a newbie to get a
reasonable setup?

Colin McRae could be the choice for a rally sim if my PC can handle
it.  I have P166 (no MMX) 64MB and Matrox Mill 8Mb.  I don't have a 3D
card and am waiting for Matrox to release a PCI version of G-200.
Don't recommend Voodoo because for the flight sim I need a card that
does 3D in a window.  I also may change the CPU for K6 300MHz.

--
Mikko Harjula                  SQ Consulting Oy  | If you email me from a

tel.   +358-3-3165206          33710 Tampere     | use subject "I AM NOT SPAM"
fax    +358-3-3165201          FINLAND           |

Jeroen van Engelenhove

F1 and rally simm recommendations?

by Jeroen van Engelenhove » Wed, 16 Sep 1998 04:00:00

F1 RS is THE game to get. No question about that. There are so much config
and setup options that this game is suited for > 2 year old arcade racers
AND < 18 year old hard-core simmers. But... your lost without a Voodoo
card... (and in comes your next question):

Colin indeed seems to be the rally game to wait for. There aren't any good
rally sims yet (IRC is crap, imo). But your problems with Colin will be your
problems with F1RS: you need at least a P200 and a Voodoo card to get smooth
framerates. I had a P200 MMX, 32 EDO RAM and Voodoo1 system and F1RS was
good, except for a very choppy first lap. Now I got a Celeron 266 OC to 333,
64 PC100 RAM and a Voodoo2 and it's heaven. Really. Forget about flight sims
in a window. Get another flightsim! And get Voodoo2 and a new CPU.
Or... you can have a Voodoo card and still play games in a window (thought
not with the Voodoo support). Getting a Voodoo card doesn't mean you can't
play non-glide games anymore! You can even play D3D games using your coming
G200 card and disable D3D for the Voodoo card. Computers are very flexible
things, really... The choice is yours :-)

Jeroen van Engelenhoven

Ronald Stoe

F1 and rally simm recommendations?

by Ronald Stoe » Wed, 16 Sep 1998 04:00:00


> >In this respect what F1 and rally sims would you recomment?  F1RS
> >seems to be highly regarded but is there a way for a newbie to get a
> >reasonable setup?

> F1 RS is THE game to get. No question about that. There are so much config
> and setup options that this game is suited for > 2 year old arcade racers
> AND < 18 year old hard-core simmers. But... your lost without a Voodoo

Oh no, don't tell me, I'm too old for F1RS... ;^)
(I'm much older than 18!)

l8er
ronny

--
How to get rid of censorship in German game releases
<http://www.gamesmania.com/german/maniac/freedom/freedom.htm>

          |\      _,,,---,,_        I want to die like my Grandfather,
   ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_              in his sleep.
        |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'     Not like the people in his car,
       '---''(_/--'  `-'\_)            screaming their heads off!

Brian Shor

F1 and rally simm recommendations?

by Brian Shor » Wed, 16 Sep 1998 04:00:00

I'd say that F1RS is good... you can download setups for it on the net (as you can
for most sims), and worry just about driving.  You do need a 3dfx card or a
direct3d card, but 3dfx is better...
Just curious, but why do you NEED to play your flight sims in a window?  What
flight sim is this that needs it?  3dfx is releasing the Banshee chip, which is
basically the Rush version of the Voodoo 2.  You can also get a 3dfx for the
racing games, and not use it for the flight sims.

Brian Short


> I'm an enthusiastic flight simmer and have always considered myself as
> non-arcade gamer in fsims, but after reading this ng I'm not sure the
> same goes in car simms.  I'm really not that much interested tuning
> suspension or wings - i'd rather be driving.  However I would like
> some realism, f.ex. I don't want a game where after a collision the
> car continues as nothing has happened.

> In this respect what F1 and rally sims would you recomment?  F1RS
> seems to be highly regarded but is there a way for a newbie to get a
> reasonable setup?

> Colin McRae could be the choice for a rally sim if my PC can handle
> it.  I have P166 (no MMX) 64MB and Matrox Mill 8Mb.  I don't have a 3D
> card and am waiting for Matrox to release a PCI version of G-200.
> Don't recommend Voodoo because for the flight sim I need a card that
> does 3D in a window.  I also may change the CPU for K6 300MHz.

> --
> Mikko Harjula                  SQ Consulting Oy  | If you email me from a

> tel.   +358-3-3165206          33710 Tampere     | use subject "I AM NOT SPAM"
> fax    +358-3-3165201          FINLAND           |

David Mast

F1 and rally simm recommendations?

by David Mast » Thu, 17 Sep 1998 04:00:00


>I'd say that F1RS is good... you can download setups for it on the net (as you
> can for most sims), and worry just about driving.  You do need a 3dfx card or a
>direct3d card, but 3dfx is better...

Seconded.  Though I've only tried F1RS with a Voodoo card.  P166 with Voodoo
would be okay.  Can't vouch for any D3D setup.  The 64MB will help.  I fixed
the first lap slowdown by going from 32 to 64.

Otherwise, I think you are stuck with previous generation sims like Indycar 2
(excellent, but hard) and F1GP2.

I wonder too.  FS98 benefited, but that's been out for a long time and I can't
imagine he refers to it as his P166/Millenium is not up to the challenge.  So,
what fsim is it?

Well, "Rush" in that it is a Voodoo with 3D/2D that will do the 3D in a
window.  But by all reports it is *faster* than the Voodoo2 in
non-multitextured games due to a higher clocking, and a fast 2D performer.  
While problems may arise on release, it looks like his best bet for now.  The
G200 seems pretty decent, but is not at the top of the class for 3D.

Jeroen van Engelenhove

F1 and rally simm recommendations?

by Jeroen van Engelenhove » Thu, 17 Sep 1998 04:00:00

Ronald Stoehr heeft geschreven in bericht

The '<' before the 18 means 18 and higher ;-) If I would have said 90 year
old etc. you would have said: I'm not that old! Next time I'll try not to be
funny and simply say the game is suited for all ages. :-)

Jeroen

Ronald Stoeh

F1 and rally simm recommendations?

by Ronald Stoeh » Thu, 17 Sep 1998 04:00:00


> Ronald Stoehr heeft geschreven in bericht

> >> F1 RS is THE game to get. No question about that. There are so much
> config
> >> and setup options that this game is suited for > 2 year old arcade racers
> >> AND < 18 year old hard-core simmers. But... your lost without a Voodoo

> >Oh no, don't tell me, I'm too old for F1RS... ;^)
> >(I'm much older than 18!)

> The '<' before the 18 means 18 and higher ;-) If I would have said 90 year
> old etc. you would have said: I'm not that old! Next time I'll try not to be
> funny and simply say the game is suited for all ages. :-)

Don't loose your humour! Did you see my smiley? ;^)
I'm an old math nerd and your sentence says: suited for less than 18
year old
hard-core simmers. Of course, I knew what you ment and was just teasing
you...

And please, stay funny... ;^)

l8er
ronny

--
Toys'R'Us '99: "So, would you like a hand gun with that action figure,
kiddo?"

          |\      _,,,---,,_        I want to die like my Grandfather,
   ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_              in his sleep.
        |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'     Not like the people in his car,
       '---''(_/--'  `-'\_)            screaming their heads off!

Mikko Harjul

F1 and rally simm recommendations?

by Mikko Harjul » Fri, 18 Sep 1998 04:00:00


> >Just curious, but why do you NEED to play your flight sims in a
> >window?  What flight sim is this that needs it?

> I wonder too.  FS98 benefited, but that's been out for a long time
> and I can't imagine he refers to it as his P166/Millenium is not up
> to the challenge.  So, what fsim is it?

Actually it is the FS98 I refer to.  I get frame rates 5-10 fps which
is somehow manageable with small aircraft.  The reason for 3D in a
window is because I want separate utility programs to be visible
simultaneously.  F.ex. to connect to control tower over the Internet,
flight planner and navigation programs etc.

I'm holding my breath to get my hands on the new MS Combat Flight Sim
that will be released soon.  Also with almost every major plyer
releasing new 3D cards I want to wait a few months before I decide how
dramatic upgrade I need to do.  My spouse and budget are definitely
saying that fastest K6-2 and soon to be released Matrox PCI version of
G200 would suffice.  Otherwise it's also the motherboard, main memory,
the case ... everything else but the monitor and HD's :-(

As this waiting is becoming too much I'll probably get a used Voodoo 1
and dump it after upgrading.

One requirement I didn't mention earlier is that if I go for 2D/3D
combo, the 2D part must work with XFree as I use Linux extensively.
There already is a working beta version for G200.

--
Mikko Harjula                  SQ Consulting Oy  | If you email me from a

tel.   +358-3-3165206          33710 Tampere     | use subject "I AM NOT SPAM"
fax    +358-3-3165201          FINLAND           |

David Mast

F1 and rally simm recommendations?

by David Mast » Fri, 18 Sep 1998 04:00:00



>Actually it is the FS98 I refer to.  I get frame rates 5-10 fps which
>is somehow manageable with small aircraft.

Ah.  I find that a framerate that low seriously detracts from the enjoyment
for me.  In a moment of weakness, I bought FS98 when I had a P133 and no 3D
card.  I found it unacceptable.  I soon had a Voodoo and it became a lot more
playable.  1.5x to 7x the framerate (depending on view) and a lot more
pleasing detail.  But I'm not really an FS98 fan anway.

If you don't need it, always pays to wait.  I think with more mature drivers,
the TNT and the yet-to-be-released Savage3D (I'll stay away from the "Tom's
Hardware" debate except to say I don't go with him on this one), can be quite
impressive.  Still, I'd go Banshee for today's Glide support.

Thing is, upgrades now are cheaper than ever.  I guess you are talking Celeron
300A, Abit BH6, ATX case, and DIMMs.  Yes, a lot of new stuff, but "only"
about $400.  I may go this way.  I think I want an Intel since I do a lot of
FPU-intensive process modeling (differential-algebraic eqns) for work.

I think this is wise.  Or, why dump it?  If you want a non-3dfx 2D/3D card,
you can always use the Voodoo1 for Glide-only or Glide-preferred titles.

Can't help you there.

Mikko Harjul

F1 and rally simm recommendations?

by Mikko Harjul » Fri, 18 Sep 1998 04:00:00


> If you don't need it, always pays to wait.  I think with more mature
> drivers, the TNT and the yet-to-be-released Savage3D (I'll stay away
> from the "Tom's Hardware" debate except to say I don't go with him
> on this one), can be quite impressive.  Still, I'd go Banshee for
> today's Glide support.

Thanks for the info.  I'll give those serious consideration and try to
find out if any of those are (or will be soon) supported by XFree.

This brings us closer to the subject of this ng - would my currently
preferred candidates F1RS and Colin McRae perform better under Glide
than D3D?

--
Mikko Harjula                  SQ Consulting Oy  | If you email me from a

tel.   +358-3-3165206          33710 Tampere     | use subject "I AM NOT SPAM"
fax    +358-3-3165201          FINLAND           |


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.