> >Whereas in ICR or ICR2, I found
> >it much smoother looking (and driving) at 20 fps, and even playable at
> >less than 15 fps (this is going back some years).
> I still disagree. I remember having to run ICR2 and N2 in 320x200, as
> it was the only way to get a really solid frame-rate.
framerates before a racing sim is even worthy of your consideration?
Yep... I think you are way too intolerant to what you conceive to be
crappy framerates. 300x200 in Nascar 2... Haha.
I did a F12K race yesterday starting from the rear. On the grid, the
fps was 13. The start went fine and the rest of the race was around
18-19fps. I had a whole lot of fun, and finished in second and the
framerate and my racing experience was perfectly acceptable at
those numbers.
Of course I could have been focusing on what the numbers were
and had a miserable time. But regardless of the numbers, the
race was very smooth. If I didn't have numbers I would not have
realized that the fps was below 20-25fps.
--
Header address intentionally scrambled to ward off the spamming hordes.
Please reply to: cisko[AT] ix [dot] netcom [dot] com