> I dig running GP3 at like Silverstone then jumping into GPL and running the
> same track. You get a real historical feel for GPL that way.
> David
> > Spot on, Hammer. For serious simming, run GPL. It's rewarding when you
> get
> > it right, but you can (metaphorically) raise a sweat doing so. But for
> > sheer fun, GP3 is hard to beat.
> > GMF
Well of course I have GPL as well, but I have to admit I have not run
it much in the last year or so. Maybe time to dust that off again. I
do remember in the past I had a difficult time doing both, they are so
different... you have so much grip and downforce available to you in
modern F1... but how I do love a good GPL powerslide, and navigating
the Masta Kink at Spa in the Ferrari with a lift and a sqeeze...
classic stuff :)
In GP3, I'm wondering if they are actually modelling airflow over the
wings. It seems to me, that unlike GP2, when I get close to the rear
of a car in GP3, I actually lose significant front end downforce, as
would occur IRL. However, I'm not sure if this is a product of frame
rate/CPU occupancy, or an accurate physics modeling mechanism.... it's
difficult to know.
I have also noticed the AI can be dumb at spots... like at Hockenheim,
I am able to lap almost 2 seconds a lap faster than the McLarens
because they have a stupid setup and they lose 2 seconds to me in the
stadium complex every lap, which is a bit annoying. Using stock
performance, Mika hits 216kph down the longest straight, to my 210kph,
but I outlap him by at least 2 seconds every lap unless I*** it up,
because he crawls through the stadium complex like he has a hamster on
a wheel in place of the Mercedes. But at some of the other tracks,
the AI is damn fast and takes a very good setup to beat them.
Cheers... glad to hear others are enjoying GP3 as I am. I mean ya, it
has it's quirks and weaknesses, and us sim'ers can be awful critical
at times, but ya sometimes it's just plain fun, if ya take it for what
it is.
Hammer