>> I was just making the point that Stirling says that, but when he was
>> actually in that kind of situation (well, actually it was his choice
>> to go out of his way to get Mike Hawthorn reinstated), he did the
>> opposite. They have a name for people who say one thing but do the
>> other - politicians. I don't want politics to get more involved in F1
>> than they already are (pushing F1 to the far east due to tobacco
>> sponsorship laws and suchlike).
unfairly treated and did something about it, that he's a hypocrit, because
today he claims that a team forcing one driver to gift a victory to another
is wrong? If Stirling had ever been gifted a victory, that would make him
a hypocrit.
You make no sense whatsoever. Explain how Stirling is a hypocrit.
cheers
John