rec.autos.simulators

original world circuit

David Gar

original world circuit

by David Gar » Thu, 08 May 1997 04:00:00



> >DO you all think $20 is a resonable price for the first game.  That was
> >the price from chips and bits this summer.  I am sure it has dropped
> >since gp2s release.  Is it worth it, I thaught it might be fun but is it
> >comparable to gp2?

GP2 is 5 bucks more than the original GP1 in the bargain bins. Must tell
you something.
If you are interested in the older sim because of a slower system and
want a top
of the line "open wheeled" sim for VGA, go with Indycar 1. It would be
absurd to try to
compare the "sprite" filled World Curcuit to Papy's masterpiece.

-DG-

Dave Bower

original world circuit

by Dave Bower » Thu, 15 May 1997 04:00:00





>> >DO you all think $20 is a resonable price for the first game.  That was
>> >the price from chips and bits this summer.  I am sure it has dropped
>> >since gp2s release.  Is it worth it, I thaught it might be fun but is it
>> >comparable to gp2?

>GP2 is 5 bucks more than the original GP1 in the bargain bins. Must tell
>you something.
>If you are interested in the older sim because of a slower system and
>want a top
>of the line "open wheeled" sim for VGA, go with Indycar 1. It would be
>absurd to try to
>compare the "sprite" filled World Curcuit to Papy's masterpiece.

He didn't ask how F1GP compares to Indycar, he asked how it compared to
GP2. Besides, F1GP's main rival at the time of release was Indianapolis
500 or whatever, Papyrus' first racing sim, so F1GP was the technically
better game.
--
Dave Bowers

rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.