rec.autos.simulators

New SciTech Display Doctor

Eric T. Busc

New SciTech Display Doctor

by Eric T. Busc » Wed, 29 Jan 1997 04:00:00

No one else has mentioned it here, so I guess I will.  SciTech just
released version 5.3a of it's popular UniVBE program, Display Doctor,
which now boasts support for the Verite chip.  You can download a
21-day fully functional demo, but you have to send off for the full
version.  See what happens when you don't register your shareware?  For
more info see: http://www.racesimcentral.net/

--

The IWCCCARS Project: Q & A Representative
http://www.racesimcentral.net/
http://www.racesimcentral.net/~ebusch/

Michael E. Carve

New SciTech Display Doctor

by Michael E. Carve » Wed, 29 Jan 1997 04:00:00


: No one else has mentioned it here, so I guess I will.  SciTech just
: released version 5.3a of it's popular UniVBE program, Display Doctor,
: which now boasts support for the Verite chip.  You can download a
: 21-day fully functional demo, but you have to send off for the full
: version.  See what happens when you don't register your shareware?  For
: more info see: http://www.scitechsoft.com/sdd.html

I am just curious, but how would using UniVBE help a video card that
already complies with VESA v2.0?  Is there some magic in SciTech's
software (just another layer to go through to get to the card), that can
out perform the native BIOS?

--
**************************** Michael E. Carver *************************
     Upside out, or inside down...False alarm the only game in town.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<[ /./.  [-  < ]>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Eric T. Busc

New SciTech Display Doctor

by Eric T. Busc » Wed, 29 Jan 1997 04:00:00

I really have no idea how or even if it will improve performance.
Perhaps their VESA driver is faster than the card's on board support?

--

The IWCCCARS Project: Q & A Representative
http://www.theuspits.com/iwcccars/index.html
http://userwww.service.emory.edu/~ebusch/



Don Mullin

New SciTech Display Doctor

by Don Mullin » Wed, 29 Jan 1997 04:00:00



> : No one else has mentioned it here, so I guess I will.  SciTech just
> : released version 5.3a of it's popular UniVBE program, Display Doctor,
> : which now boasts support for the Verite chip.  You can download a
> : 21-day fully functional demo, but you have to send off for the full
> : version.  See what happens when you don't register your shareware?  For
> : more info see: http://www.racesimcentral.net/

> I am just curious, but how would using UniVBE help a video card that
> already complies with VESA v2.0?  Is there some magic in SciTech's
> software (just another layer to go through to get to the card), that can
> out perform the native BIOS?

> --
> **************************** Michael E. Carver *************************
>      Upside out, or inside down...False alarm the only game in town.

> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<[ /./.  [-  < ]>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

        When I used Univbe(5.2 I believe) with Nascar2 it seemed to speed up
quite a bit and my card is Vesa2.0 compliant.
--
There is no problem we can't ignore if we really put our minds to it.

GO #2!

        Mullins Motorsports Inc.
        http://www.***tron.com/~ddmj

Kai Fulle

New SciTech Display Doctor

by Kai Fulle » Thu, 30 Jan 1997 04:00:00

here do I get scitechs setup doctor?

--
--Kai Fuller
  Senior Writer of IOR (previously INR)

  GO Thunderbirds!!!!!!! (WHL)

Eric T. Busc

New SciTech Display Doctor

by Eric T. Busc » Thu, 30 Jan 1997 04:00:00

http://www.scitechsoft.com/sdd.html

--

The IWCCCARS Project: Q & A Representative
http://www.theuspits.com/iwcccars/index.html
http://userwww.service.emory.edu/~ebusch/



rickfis

New SciTech Display Doctor

by rickfis » Thu, 30 Jan 1997 04:00:00


> No one else has mentioned it here, so I guess I will.  SciTech just
> released version 5.3a of it's popular UniVBE program, Display Doctor,
> which now boasts support for the Verite chip.  You can download a
> 21-day fully functional demo, but you have to send off for the full
> version.  See what happens when you don't register your shareware?  For
> more info see: http://www.scitechsoft.com/sdd.html

I downloaded the DOS only version.  There is no mention of Verite
support in the readme file.  Is this for Windows only?

Rick

John Twitchel

New SciTech Display Doctor

by John Twitchel » Fri, 31 Jan 1997 04:00:00

 Try the windows version. It contains the dos version as well.
I have been using the SSD5.3a with my Intergraph video card but I
have not noticed any improvment in Nascar 2.

Eric T. Busc

New SciTech Display Doctor

by Eric T. Busc » Fri, 31 Jan 1997 04:00:00

As far as I can tell, all it does is add support for same new VESA
resolutions that the card's onboard VESA 2.0 doesn't support.  Try
running Quake with it loaded to see the new modes.

--

The IWCCCARS Project: Q & A Representative
http://www.theuspits.com/iwcccars/index.html
http://userwww.service.emory.edu/~ebusch/



SimRaci

New SciTech Display Doctor

by SimRaci » Fri, 31 Jan 1997 04:00:00

I noticed a jump in performance after creating the drivers within the N2

:)

...your mileage may vary.

Marc

Marc J. Nelson
Sim Racing News - USA
http://members.aol.com/simracing

Brad Rosenbau

New SciTech Display Doctor

by Brad Rosenbau » Fri, 31 Jan 1997 04:00:00

How do measure the frame rate while running N2?

Thanks,
Brad


> I noticed a jump in performance after creating the drivers within the N2

> :)

> ...your mileage may vary.

> Marc

> Marc J. Nelson
> Sim Racing News - USA
> http://members.aol.com/simracing

Michael E. Carve

New SciTech Display Doctor

by Michael E. Carve » Fri, 31 Jan 1997 04:00:00



: > Try the windows version. It contains the dos version as well.
: >I have been using the SSD5.3a with my Intergraph video card but I
: >have not noticed any improvment in Nascar 2.

: Neither have I..

: I wonder..???

The original need for UniVBE was that many video cards did not have VESA
compliant extensions.  Some that did had "bugs" in the firmware
implementation of VESA.  The Intergraph has VESA 2.0 compliant code
already.  Unless SciTech can create EXTREMELY SUPER EFFECIENT code, it
would make sense that the code in the hardware can interact with the
card faster than a TSR program.  

Unless there is some other feature that the DisplayDoctor can provide, I
think it's overkill to install it for the Intergraph.

--
**************************** Michael E. Carver *************************
     Upside out, or inside down...False alarm the only game in town.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<[ /./.  [-  < ]>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Matthew Lewi

New SciTech Display Doctor

by Matthew Lewi » Fri, 31 Jan 1997 04:00:00


> The original need for UniVBE was that many video cards did not have VESA
> compliant extensions.  Some that did had "bugs" in the firmware
> implementation of VESA.  The Intergraph has VESA 2.0 compliant code
> already.  Unless SciTech can create EXTREMELY SUPER EFFECIENT code, it
> would make sense that the code in the hardware can interact with the
> card faster than a TSR program.

> Unless there is some other feature that the DisplayDoctor can provide, I
> think it's overkill to install it for the Intergraph.

I would agree, and add that this program is also overkill for the
Screamin'3D card.  I got NO improvement in either vQuake or Nascar2.  I
even ran Quake benchmarks and saw no improvement.  Not even .1 fps
increase.  Perhaps the "Doctor" only fixes and speeds up graphics when
you have a true problem hindering max. performance.  My card, evidently
previously well-configured, saw no performance gain.
--
Matt Lewis

Frederik Schukke

New SciTech Display Doctor

by Frederik Schukke » Fri, 31 Jan 1997 04:00:00

Without Univbe Nascar 2 is nothing but a rare bunch of coleurs with my
Herc. 128~

Frederik



> > The original need for UniVBE was that many video cards did not have VESA
> > compliant extensions.  Some that did had "bugs" in the firmware
> > implementation of VESA.  The Intergraph has VESA 2.0 compliant code
> > already.  Unless SciTech can create EXTREMELY SUPER EFFECIENT code, it
> > would make sense that the code in the hardware can interact with the
> > card faster than a TSR program.

> > Unless there is some other feature that the DisplayDoctor can provide, I
> > think it's overkill to install it for the Intergraph.

> I would agree, and add that this program is also overkill for the
> Screamin'3D card.  I got NO improvement in either vQuake or Nascar2.  I
> even ran Quake benchmarks and saw no improvement.  Not even .1 fps
> increase.  Perhaps the "Doctor" only fixes and speeds up graphics when
> you have a true problem hindering max. performance.  My card, evidently
> previously well-configured, saw no performance gain.
> --
> Matt Lewis


Greg Cisk

New SciTech Display Doctor

by Greg Cisk » Sat, 01 Feb 1997 04:00:00



While I am not sure about the intergraph, there is one HUGE need for the
DisplayDoctor
in the flight-sim arena. There is a new game called Flying Corps. If you
run it in DOS
and run UNIVBE, you are allowed to run other SVGA resolutions other than
640x480.
Imagine how fast GP2 would be at 512x384 instead of 640x480. In Flying
Corps it
make the difference on a low end (P5-133) machine. So SDD can make a
difference.
However, I do not think GP2 will allow any resolutions other than 640x480 &
300x200.
So we are screwed there :-)

> --
> **************************** Michael E. Carver *************************
>      Upside out, or inside down...False alarm the only game in town.

> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<[ /./.  [-  < ]>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.