rec.autos.simulators

Interesting N2Demo learnings...

Nick Totor

Interesting N2Demo learnings...

by Nick Totor » Sat, 28 Sep 1996 04:00:00

I don't know if many of you remember, but I made a post a few days
ago asking why my car constantly pulls hard to the left on the demo. I
am using a T2, ACM and the same speed setting on the ACM as I do all my
other sims. Well... strangely enough I got it to stop. In the "options"
section I changed the manner of control from "wheel" to "joystick" and
it stopped.
     Kinda' odd, dontcha' think? I went on to race Atlanta and WGI and
won at both starting from the back (the AI on the demo don't put up much
of a fight <g>). The graphics are wonderful. I really enjoyed the
detail. As well, WGI looks marvelous... it actually resembles the real
track rather than the version in NASCAR Racing. The dimension and model
of the track looks more accurate as well (I hope the rest of the tracks
have the quality of WGI).
     This game seems to be a hog as well. A lower Pentium and graphics
cars will not really cut it as well and with the satisfaction that a
user will want. It's all worth it, IMHO.
     The spotter makes the game so much more fun. It's one of those
things that you really didn't know you missed because you never had it.
It made racing on both courses in the demo much more
confidence-inspiring. There are a few rough points (no mirrors?) however
this is a demo and I'm quite sure they'll be worked out.
     I can honestly say that this game will beat and has aleady beaten
my expecations in demo form.
     Nick
_______________________________________________________________

#6 and #94 in the *real* quest for the Cup!
My home away from home...  http://www.racesimcentral.net/~ntotoro/
_______________________________________________________________

Jeff Salzma

Interesting N2Demo learnings...

by Jeff Salzma » Sun, 29 Sep 1996 04:00:00

On Fri, 27 Sep 1996 15:26:20 -0400, Nick Totoro


>I don't know if many of you remember, but I made a post a few days
>ago asking why my car constantly pulls hard to the left on the demo. I
>am using a T2, ACM and the same speed setting on the ACM as I do all my
>other sims. Well... strangely enough I got it to stop. In the "options"
>section I changed the manner of control from "wheel" to "joystick" and
>it stopped.

What sound card are you using?? Is it a Gravis??

Well, initially, I thought the graphics of N2 were on-par with GP2,
maybe even better. Now I beg to differ. For starters (I know it's a
demo,but...) the annoying switch-detail during replays blows. Bigtime.
Blimp view?? Hahahahahaha. I am really annoyed, though, at the armco
(guardrail) lines flickering all the time. I don't see this in GP2 at
all. What gives? This is really annoying, when this happens, the game
stops being a sim. Fix this. Please!!

P166, 32MB RAM, 512K Burst, Matrox Millenium. Slower frame rate than
Gp2, I even played with it a lot. I hope that this improves, since
there's a helluva lot less to show than Gp2 and it's slower anyway.
Damn.

Jeff

Trevor C Thoma

Interesting N2Demo learnings...

by Trevor C Thoma » Sun, 29 Sep 1996 04:00:00

I have a P133, 32 meg EDO, 512k pb cache, Triton II mobo and an STB
Lightspeed, I am able to run the demo with ALL detail on at a btter
framerate than Nascar1 and comparable to GP2 with less detail turned on.

The demo has been said to run slower than the finished product so I for
one am really going to be happy with the framerate :)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas Enterprises          Makers of the TSW the best racing
controller.
http://www.ia.net/~thomas   Lifetime warranty. Solid steel construction.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jeff Salzma

Interesting N2Demo learnings...

by Jeff Salzma » Sun, 29 Sep 1996 04:00:00



We can only hope- I am still bummed about that line-zipping thing
going on at WG...looks worse than TV...

Jeff

PS- I am using SDD 5.3, and changing it on/off didn't help. Thoughts?
Maybe the linear stuff isn't implemented yet or something.

Michael E. Carv

Interesting N2Demo learnings...

by Michael E. Carv » Sun, 29 Sep 1996 04:00:00

: Well, initially, I thought the graphics of N2 were on-par with GP2,
: maybe even better. Now I beg to differ. For starters (I know it's a
: demo,but...) the annoying switch-detail during replays blows. Bigtime.
: Blimp view?? Hahahahahaha. I am really annoyed, though, at the armco
: (guardrail) lines flickering all the time. I don't see this in GP2 at
: all. What gives? This is really annoying, when this happens, the game
: stops being a sim. Fix this. Please!!

I will agree.  The moire-ing of the armco at the Glen is very
distracting.  It sorta reminds me a a blue & white barber pole.

: P166, 32MB RAM, 512K Burst, Matrox Millenium. Slower frame rate than
: Gp2, I even played with it a lot. I hope that this improves, since
: there's a helluva lot less to show than Gp2 and it's slower anyway.
: Damn.

Am sure this will be improved.  This is a demo and has not been
optimized yet.  Knowing this I am impressed.  However, the graphics
still seem to be pixellated.  Until I get a 3-d accelerator I will just
pretend that this is from the "pitting" of the windshield. ;-)

--
**************************** Michael E. Carver *************************
     Upside out, or inside down...False alarm the only game in town.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<[ /./.  [-  < ]>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Robert Mull

Interesting N2Demo learnings...

by Robert Mull » Sun, 29 Sep 1996 04:00:00


>On Fri, 27 Sep 1996 15:26:20 -0400, Nick Totoro

>>I don't know if many of you remember, but I made a post a few days
>>ago asking why my car constantly pulls hard to the left on the demo. I
>>am using a T2, ACM and the same speed setting on the ACM as I do all my
>>other sims. Well... strangely enough I got it to stop. In the "options"
>>section I changed the manner of control from "wheel" to "joystick" and
>>it stopped.
>What sound card are you using?? Is it a Gravis??
>>     Kinda' odd, dontcha' think? I went on to race Atlanta and WGI and
>>won at both starting from the back (the AI on the demo don't put up much
>>of a fight <g>). The graphics are wonderful. I really enjoyed the
>>detail. As well, WGI looks marvelous... it actually resembles the real
>>track rather than the version in NASCAR Racing. The dimension and model
>>of the track looks more accurate as well (I hope the rest of the tracks
>>have the quality of WGI).
>Well, initially, I thought the graphics of N2 were on-par with GP2,
>maybe even better. Now I beg to differ. For starters (I know it's a
>demo,but...) the annoying switch-detail during replays blows. Bigtime.
>Blimp view?? Hahahahahaha. I am really annoyed, though, at the armco
>(guardrail) lines flickering all the time. I don't see this in GP2 at
>all. What gives? This is really annoying, when this happens, the game
>stops being a sim. Fix this. Please!!
>>     This game seems to be a hog as well. A lower Pentium and graphics
>>cars will not really cut it as well and with the satisfaction that a
>>user will want. It's all worth it, IMHO.
>P166, 32MB RAM, 512K Burst, Matrox Millenium. Slower frame rate than
>Gp2, I even played with it a lot. I hope that this improves, since
>there's a helluva lot less to show than Gp2 and it's slower anyway.
>Damn.
>Jeff

I am running Nascar2 on a p5-166 w/ 24megs and a Lightspeed 128 and it
is smooth with all details on. I would say propably 22-25 fps. You
should keep in mind that this is strictly a demo and Adam has said
that there will faster frame rates in the final.
Nick Totor

Interesting N2Demo learnings...

by Nick Totor » Sun, 29 Sep 1996 04:00:00

     <<I will agree. The moire-ing of the armco at the Glen is very
distracting. It sorta reminds me a a blue & white barber pole.>>

     I understand how you feel, especially considering that most players
are accustomed to the NASCAR Racing version of WGI, however the armco
barrier as represented on the demo is actually how the track is. I found
it to be actually a little smoother and easier to run after a few tries.

     <<Am sure this will be improved. This is a demo and has not been
optimized yet. Knowing this I am impressed.  However, the graphics
still seem to be pixellated.>>

     Speaking of improvements, I did notice one area this morning where
I had a little scuffle. For some reason, the timing is misjudging my
laps. At AMS, I was running what were clearly laps in the high 170's and
the timing said I was going 155. Strange, especially considering that
you never go that slowly there, even in the turns.
     Nick
_______________________________________________________________

#6 and #94 in the *real* quest for the Cup!
My home away from home...  http://www.mindspring.com/~ntotoro/
_______________________________________________________________

Nick Totor

Interesting N2Demo learnings...

by Nick Totor » Sun, 29 Sep 1996 04:00:00

     <<What sound card are you using?? Is it a Gravis??>>

     I'm using an older SB16 (not P-n-P) but have disabled the joystick
port and am using a Thrustmaster ACM for a game card.

     <<I don't see this in GP2 at all. What gives? This is really
annoying, when this happens, the game stops being a sim. Fix this.
Please!!>>

     It's just a demo. That being said, I'm sure they realize the
problem and will have it corrected by the time the actual game is in
production. That is the reason for a demo. I feel the replay function is
pretty useless in demo form, so it really can't possibly be staying the
way it is.
     Nick
_______________________________________________________________

#6 and #94 in the *real* quest for the Cup!
My home away from home...  http://www.mindspring.com/~ntotoro/
_______________________________________________________________

Alan Pe

Interesting N2Demo learnings...

by Alan Pe » Tue, 01 Oct 1996 04:00:00

maybe even better. Now I beg to differ. For starters (I know it's a
demo,but...) the annoying switch-detail during replays blows. Bigtime.
Blimp view?? Hahahahahaha. I am really annoyed, though, at the armco
(guardrail) lines flickering all the time. I don't see this in GP2 at
all. What gives? This is really annoying, when this happens, the game
stops being a sim. Fix this. Please!! <<

Nascar 2 *is not* a game, or sim, or anything but a demo ... yet.  Wait
for the final release to pass judgement, eh?

!^NavFont02F01D9000BQGJHH7CHHDAFBC8

--

Posted 09/29/96 at 21:31

David Spark

Interesting N2Demo learnings...

by David Spark » Tue, 01 Oct 1996 04:00:00


>     Speaking of improvements, I did notice one area this morning where
>I had a little scuffle. For some reason, the timing is misjudging my
>laps. At AMS, I was running what were clearly laps in the high 170's and
>the timing said I was going 155. Strange, especially considering that
>you never go that slowly there, even in the turns.

If I'm not mistaken, the F1 screen is currently displaying the average lap
speed/time, not the last lap.

Dave (davids) Sparks
Late Night League
http://www.sequoia-dev.com/Hawaii/latenite.html

Scott Fo

Interesting N2Demo learnings...

by Scott Fo » Tue, 01 Oct 1996 04:00:00

: P166, 32MB RAM, 512K Burst, Matrox Millenium. Slower frame rate than
: Gp2, I even played with it a lot. I hope that this improves, since
: there's a helluva lot less to show than Gp2 and it's slower anyway.
: Damn.

I would keep playing.  I have a P133, 32 megs EDO, 256k burst, ATI Mach 64
2Meg Vram, and I get perfectly smooth frame rates (by this I mean that
I cannot tell a slow down at all, in fact I have clouds set to auto, with
the minimum F.R. set at 27, and they stay on all the time.) That is also
drawing 15 cars ahead, and 8 or 9 behind, and the mirror on.  Are you
trying to run it through win 95?  BTW this performance was achieved as per
the readme, with the computer shut down into MSDOS mode.  Good Luck

--

__________________________________________________________

                         Member
                    Alpha Psi chapter

__________________________________________________________

Nick Totor

Interesting N2Demo learnings...

by Nick Totor » Wed, 02 Oct 1996 04:00:00

     <<If I'm not mistaken, the F1 screen is currently displaying the
average lap speed/time, not the last lap.>>

     I'd agree except for a few things. One, there are no cautions on to
slow the field. Hence, the leader, at least, is always at speed and a
20mph+ variance is quite large.
     Second, when I raced WGI and chose to monitor lap times rather than
speed, I was seeing lap times that really shouldn't have been if that
were the case. For instance, I started a race there last in the grid (no
big deal... seventh). Conservatively, I made my way to the lead by
mid-lap three. The AI cars love to block, don't they! Quite dangerous if
you're not careful... I love it   8 )
     After I got through the traffic my next lap time, with a clear
track, was a whopping six seconds faster! Is that possibly right? I'm
sure it wasn't an average of six seconds because, after four-five laps
of racing, I don't think I ran quickly enough in one lap to lop off six
seconds from the average race speed. Heck, I know the blocking slowed me
a little, but I didn't even think I ran *one* lap six seconds more
quickly!
     If we could get an answer on what type of model is used I'm sure
many would appreciate it.
     Nick
_______________________________________________________________

#6 and #94 in the *real* quest for the Cup!
My home away from home...  http://www.mindspring.com/~ntotoro/
_______________________________________________________________

Trevor C Thoma

Interesting N2Demo learnings...

by Trevor C Thoma » Wed, 02 Oct 1996 04:00:00


> : P166, 32MB RAM, 512K Burst, Matrox Millenium. Slower frame rate than
> : Gp2, I even played with it a lot. I hope that this improves, since
> : there's a helluva lot less to show than Gp2 and it's slower anyway.
> : Damn.

> I would keep playing.  I have a P133, 32 megs EDO, 256k burst, ATI Mach 64
> 2Meg Vram, and I get perfectly smooth frame rates (by this I mean that
> I cannot tell a slow down at all, in fact I have clouds set to auto, with
> the minimum F.R. set at 27, and they stay on all the time.) That is also
> drawing 15 cars ahead, and 8 or 9 behind, and the mirror on.  Are you
> trying to run it through win 95?  BTW this performance was achieved as per
> the readme, with the computer shut down into MSDOS mode.  Good Luck

> --

> __________________________________________________________

>                          Member
>                     Alpha Psi chapter

> __________________________________________________________

I dont understand why some guys are complaining that N2 runs slow, I
have a 133, 32 meg EDO, 512k cache, Triton II mobo and N2 runs way
faster with full detail than N1, GP2. The only one that is comparable is
ICR2 where I can get some slowdown but very little.

Maybe the machine is a dog, a benchmark test seems in order.

Trev

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas Enterprises          Makers of the TSW the best racing
controller.
http://www.ia.net/~thomas   Lifetime warranty. Solid steel construction.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

JC

Interesting N2Demo learnings...

by JC » Wed, 02 Oct 1996 04:00:00


>: P166, 32MB RAM, 512K Burst, Matrox Millenium. Slower frame rate than
>: Gp2, I even played with it a lot. I hope that this improves, since
>: there's a helluva lot less to show than Gp2 and it's slower anyway.
>: Damn.
>I would keep playing.  I have a P133, 32 megs EDO, 256k burst, ATI Mach 64
>2Meg Vram, and I get perfectly smooth frame rates (by this I mean that
>I cannot tell a slow down at all, in fact I have clouds set to auto, with
>the minimum F.R. set at 27, and they stay on all the time.) That is also
>drawing 15 cars ahead, and 8 or 9 behind, and the mirror on.  Are you
>trying to run it through win 95?  BTW this performance was achieved as per
>the readme, with the computer shut down into MSDOS mode.  Good Luck

--snip--

I am running the demo on a P133, 16 megs EDO, 512k Burst, Matrox
Millennium.  Frame rate is fantastic.  I have everything on, but
asphalt texture.  Clouds on auto and Min. F.R. at 20, and the clouds
stay on constantly.  And as above, this was achieved as per the
readme, with the computer shut down in MSDOS mode.

J. Villanueva

Rich McCab

Interesting N2Demo learnings...

by Rich McCab » Fri, 04 Oct 1996 04:00:00



> > : P166, 32MB RAM, 512K Burst, Matrox Millenium. Slower frame rate than
> > : Gp2, I even played with it a lot. I hope that this improves, since
> > : there's a helluva lot less to show than Gp2 and it's slower anyway.
> > : Damn.

> > I would keep playing.  I have a P133, 32 megs EDO, 256k burst, ATI Mach 64
> > 2Meg Vram, and I get perfectly smooth frame rates (by this I mean that
> > I cannot tell a slow down at all, in fact I have clouds set to auto, with
> > the minimum F.R. set at 27, and they stay on all the time.) That is also
> > drawing 15 cars ahead, and 8 or 9 behind, and the mirror on.  Are you
> > trying to run it through win 95?  BTW this performance was achieved as per
> > the readme, with the computer shut down into MSDOS mode.  Good Luck

> > --

> > __________________________________________________________

> >                          Member
> >                     Alpha Psi chapter

> > __________________________________________________________

> I dont understand why some guys are complaining that N2 runs slow, I
> have a 133, 32 meg EDO, 512k cache, Triton II mobo and N2 runs way
> faster with full detail than N1, GP2. The only one that is comparable is
> ICR2 where I can get some slowdown but very little.

> Maybe the machine is a dog, a benchmark test seems in order.

> Trev

> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Thomas Enterprises          Makers of the TSW the best racing
> controller.
> http://www.ia.net/~thomas   Lifetime warranty. Solid steel construction.

> -------------------------------------------------------------------------

I have tried the demo on 3 PCs. It seems to be spotty on the
performance. My 166/32/diam. 3400 runs good. My dads 166/16 matrox runs
bad. And my buddies 100/16 ATI runs better than dads 166.
RAM does not seem to help, but the video card manufacturer does seem to
change things.

Rich

Des Moines, IA


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.