rec.autos.simulators

Demo Review (unscientific)

Justin Sa

Demo Review (unscientific)

by Justin Sa » Wed, 25 Sep 1996 04:00:00

Well, I downloaded the demo (easily and first time at the metrixx (?)
site and installed it.   Right off, I notice the graphics are even
cripser and clearer a bit than ICR2 (my imagination and anticipation
probably).  The Atlanta track now looks like the Atlanta track as it
appears (anyone confirm this?) that the banking is a little closer to
reality than the original Nascar.  The physical attributes of the
track (the condo tower, the new front straight grandstand (which is
actually on the current back straight) and a more complete infield
make it more realistic.   Playable though?  YES.  I don't have a super
computer, but it's no paperweight either (P150, 16 meg, 2 meg PCI vid
card) and the graphics were smooth in the game.  Replays dragged a bit
and were quite choppy as you could actually watch the game DRAW the
track in 200 foot sections in front of the car and pull it up behind
the car.  The sound is exactly the same.  Engine, thunks into the
wall, tire skidding, etc.  One thing that is welcomed is the "good ol'
boy" spotter you have on the "radio" which is pretty well done.  He
doesn't talk your ear off but lets you look straight ahead while he
watches the traffic next to you high or low.  He even gives
encouragement like "Bring it home now...you're the man...."  One thing
I didn't see (or at least it didn't appear with the settings and I
looked) were the tire marks on "the line" around the track.   Those
nice black smudges you follow around the track and keep some semblence
of a line to take.   Did I miss something?   Anyway, MY report card on
the demo:

Graphics: A
Graphics Speed: A-   Graphics Speed in Replay: B
Sound: C (no difference, maybe release will have slight upgrades?)
Realism: A (track environment more realistic, even uses PCX photo)
Artistics: A (between race screens, photo PCX instead of graphic PCX)

Overall: A  (Solid upgrade from the original, worth the money)  

I'd give it a rating of about 140-50% over NASCAR.   Not twice as
nice, but it did add things that were really needed and eliminated the
shortcomings of the old engine.    

Don Mullin

Demo Review (unscientific)

by Don Mullin » Wed, 25 Sep 1996 04:00:00


> Well, I downloaded the demo (easily and first time at the metrixx (?)
> site and installed it.   Right off, I notice the graphics are even
> cripser and clearer a bit than ICR2 (my imagination and anticipation
> probably).  The Atlanta track now looks like the Atlanta track as it
> appears (anyone confirm this?) that the banking is a little closer to
> reality than the original Nascar.  The physical attributes of the
> track (the condo tower, the new front straight grandstand (which is
> actually on the current back straight) and a more complete infield
> make it more realistic.   Playable though?  YES.  I don't have a super
> computer, but it's no paperweight either (P150, 16 meg, 2 meg PCI vid
> card) and the graphics were smooth in the game.  Replays dragged a bit
> and were quite choppy as you could actually watch the game DRAW the
> track in 200 foot sections in front of the car and pull it up behind
> the car.  The sound is exactly the same.  Engine, thunks into the
> wall, tire skidding, etc.  One thing that is welcomed is the "good ol'
> boy" spotter you have on the "radio" which is pretty well done.  He
> doesn't talk your ear off but lets you look straight ahead while he
> watches the traffic next to you high or low.  He even gives
> encouragement like "Bring it home now...you're the man...."  One thing
> I didn't see (or at least it didn't appear with the settings and I
> looked) were the tire marks on "the line" around the track.   Those
> nice black smudges you follow around the track and keep some semblence
> of a line to take.   Did I miss something?   Anyway, MY report card on
> the demo:

> Graphics: A
> Graphics Speed: A-   Graphics Speed in Replay: B
> Sound: C (no difference, maybe release will have slight upgrades?)
> Realism: A (track environment more realistic, even uses PCX photo)
> Artistics: A (between race screens, photo PCX instead of graphic PCX)

> Overall: A  (Solid upgrade from the original, worth the money)

> I'd give it a rating of about 140-50% over NASCAR.   Not twice as
> nice, but it did add things that were really needed and eliminated the
> shortcomings of the old engine.

If you read the text that came with it, it says that the final version
may not not as steep requirements and will be more refined. It runs
smooth on my P5-90 with 16 megs of ram with all graphic options on. The
original Nascar does not run good on a P5=90 with all graphic options.
Can't wait for the full version of N2!!!!!!!!!
hlhor..

Demo Review (unscientific)

by hlhor.. » Thu, 26 Sep 1996 04:00:00

Yes the Atlanta track did look like this when I attended last falls
race. Atlanta is going to be redone for next falls race. The start
finish line will be moving from where it is now to the Back stretch.

Does this mean a new TRACK PACK.


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.