rec.autos.simulators

NASCAR2 - short review of good points of demo

David Thaye

NASCAR2 - short review of good points of demo

by David Thaye » Thu, 26 Sep 1996 04:00:00

Hi,

I am going to just give the improved items I have found and liked
running the new NASCAR2. I have run NASCAR2 for  three hours on my
Pentium 150/Diamond Stealth 64 with 16Meg, Using a TSW steering wheel,
and SB16 sound card.

Once program was installed after following instructions from the Web
site I got it from, Program came up with no problems. I had to copy
sound .cfg file over from old NASCAR program to get sound as mentioned
in readme file.

The things I like about the new NASCAR2:

1. The changes in the graphics are better in NASCAR2. More detail. Not  
   quite as much as GP2, but I like the new layouts of tracks.
2. The cars are much more detailed and clearer now. I find the cars
   handle better than in NASCAR, but thats my opinion.
3. I like the new track layouts for Atlanta and Watkins Glenn. I hope
   the rest of final tracks are like these two.
4. The talking spotters are fantastic. It brings another flavor or    
   NASCAR touch the simulator. I would buy the simulator just to get
   this feature.
5. I like the new menus designs are very well done, even though alot of
   features are not implemented yet. Its great to see what the features
   are going to be when it comes out this Winter.

Things that I have noticed(probably not implemented for demo)
1  The mirror does not seem to see what is behind the car at this time.
2. My TSW wheel cannot get pedals to be used as Accelerator/Brakes. So
   I am using my shifter buttons as those functions(probably because of
   joystick feature only allowed). Surpisingly, I drive pretty good in
   this mode.
3. Under race pace lap, with only 10-12 cars, I cannot see the pace car
   with 30 cars viewing selected.
4. If you get off on the grass at Watkins Glenn, it seeems much slicker
   than in orignial NASCAR. Taction seems better on tracks.
5. The replay viewing are much different then orignal NASCAR, and the  
   long distance shots are different(some rough edges need to be
   worked out on the viewing). Not sure if full screen option works(no
   effect when clicked for demo). I like the side view stats of replay
   window.

I will be very interested to see what this product looks like in 3D when
the rendition chip comes out. To sum it up, I am going to like NASCAR2
when final version comes out.

Dave Thayer

Terje Wold Johans

NASCAR2 - short review of good points of demo

by Terje Wold Johans » Fri, 27 Sep 1996 04:00:00


> Hi,
> Things that I have noticed(probably not implemented for demo)
> 1  The mirror does not seem to see what is behind the car at this time.

Read the manual, ie readme.txt and you'll learn that
buy pressing 'm' mirrors, although bad ones, appears.

This is strange. I have a TSW too. No problem.
I guess you haven't changed the steering controls, ie
made accelerate on the y-axis(throttle that is) of the wheel, etc.

Grass is slick as hell because it is supposed to be. You should
not drive on the grass. :)

Again, if you read the manual you would learn that the various camera
angels are NOT working properly.

Will probably look exactly the same but at a constant
30 fps on a reasonable Pentium instead of ~20 fps.

Cheers!
--
--- Terje Wold Johansen

--- http://www.ifi.uio.no/~terjjo/
--- "I am your inferior superior." O.W.

David Spark

NASCAR2 - short review of good points of demo

by David Spark » Fri, 27 Sep 1996 04:00:00


>Again, if you read the manual you would learn that the various camera
>angels are NOT working properly.

Camera angels? Didn't know angels were getting this specialized... <g>

Dave (davids) Sparks
Late Night League
http://www.sequoia-dev.com/Hawaii/latenite.html

David Spark

NASCAR2 - short review of good points of demo

by David Spark » Fri, 27 Sep 1996 04:00:00


>Again, if you read the manual you would learn that the various camera
>angels are NOT working properly.

Camera angels? Didn't know angels were getting this specialized... <g>

Dave (davids) Sparks
Late Night League
http://www.sequoia-dev.com/Hawaii/latenite.html

Terje Wold Johans

NASCAR2 - short review of good points of demo

by Terje Wold Johans » Sat, 28 Sep 1996 04:00:00



> >Again, if you read the manual you would learn that the various camera
> >angels are NOT working properly.

> Camera angels? Didn't know angels were getting this specialized... <g>

ARGH!

"angles" "angles" "angles" "angles" "angles" "angles" "angles"

:-))

--
--- Terje Wold Johansen

--- http://www.ifi.uio.no/~terjjo/
--- "I am your inferior superior." O.W.

David Spark

NASCAR2 - short review of good points of demo

by David Spark » Sat, 28 Sep 1996 04:00:00



>writes:

>> >Again, if you read the manual you would learn that the various camera
>> >angels are NOT working properly.

>> Camera angels? Didn't know angels were getting this specialized... <g>

>ARGH!

>"angles" "angles" "angles" "angles" "angles" "angles" "angles"

>:-))

>--
>--- Terje Wold Johansen

>--- http://www.ifi.uio.no/~terjjo/
>--- "I am your inferior superior." O.W.

S'OK, Terje. I wouldn't have a clue how to say "angle" in Norwegian. Or any
other word for that matter. <g>

Dave (davids) Sparks
Late Night League
http://www.sequoia-dev.com/Hawaii/latenite.html

Terje Wold Johans

NASCAR2 - short review of good points of demo

by Terje Wold Johans » Mon, 30 Sep 1996 04:00:00




> >writes:

> >> >Again, if you read the manual you would learn that the various camera
> >> >angels are NOT working properly.

> >> Camera angels? Didn't know angels were getting this specialized... <g>

> >ARGH!

> >"angles" "angles" "angles" "angles" "angles" "angles" "angles"

> >:-))

> S'OK, Terje. I wouldn't have a clue how to say "angle" in Norwegian. Or any
> other word for that matter. <g>

I tell you, Norwegian pronunciation is pretty hopeless. :-)

In Norwegian "angle" means "vinkel" (pronounce it as it is).

But anyway, your point is very valid indeed, there are too
many people who pay too little attention to the
ultimate tool of communication.

Rock on!

--
--- Terje Wold Johansen

--- http://www.ifi.uio.no/~terjjo/
--- "I am your inferior superior." O.W.

Hen

NASCAR2 - short review of good points of demo

by Hen » Tue, 01 Oct 1996 04:00:00


> > I will be very interested to see what this product looks like in 3D when
> > the rendition chip comes out. To sum it up, I am going to like NASCAR2
> > when final version comes out.

> Will probably look exactly the same but at a constant
> 30 fps on a reasonable Pentium instead of ~20 fps.

Can someone (Ed, Adam?) confirm this. I've been under impression that
Rendition version would be 16-bit color instead of 8-bit ...

--
Henrikki (Hena) Hakkanen               Tel. +358-(9)0-345 5538

------- The best way to accelerate a Mac is 9.81 m/s2 --------
--------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are mine and does not
            necessarily reflect those of my employer!


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.