> >I own the game and i feel that it is much better than the first.
> Why? They dropped half a dozen features and added nothing but crappy
> tracks, crappy cars and a low frame rate.
> Joe McGinn
> ===================================================
> Author of Inside LotusScript, available August 1997
> http://www.browsebooks.com/McGinn/
> ===================================================
This is true, I'm a major NFS fan. I own NFS on 3DO, PC, and PlayStation,
and the 3DO version, even with it's slower 2d scrolling, is the
definitive version. The 3DO version was closer to a game called Road
Rash, and the 3DO credits even credit 'team Road Rash' for helping them.
NFSII was an attempt to make a great premise (an illegal 'Cannonball Run'
Rally race) into Ridge Racer. There's something tremendously cool about
blowing by a speed trap doing over 200 MPH, and hearing the clueless cop
fire up the sirens behind you. He AIN'T gonna catch you, UNLESS you mess
up. The cops are gone in NFSII, the game's single greatest mistake. The
Rally style tracks are gone too. Another mistake. I really don't consider
NFSII to be anything more than EA using a great games' name to compete
against the Ridge Racer series. NFSII is a fairly good 3d Racer, but it
isn't as good as NFS was on the sim end, and not as good as Ridge Racer
on the arcade end.It's a jack of all trades, master of none. It's a
handyman title, imho.
--
eppur si muove... 'and yet it does move'... Galileo,
after recanting his assertion of the Earth's motion.