rec.autos.simulators

Why is Need For Speed 2 so bad ??

Fuji Sarton

Why is Need For Speed 2 so bad ??

by Fuji Sarton » Sun, 18 May 1997 04:00:00

Hi..

I've heard reviews from various sources stating that NFS2 is not as good as
the first and only received lukewarn scores ??

Why ?

--
         +                     __'                  
  +   +    +   +        [1]_.-'__(Q_,._        
    +    +   +   +  . . . (o)_________(o)z>    
      FORMULA ONE RACING '97

Jim Knepl

Why is Need For Speed 2 so bad ??

by Jim Knepl » Mon, 19 May 1997 04:00:00


>>I've heard reviews from various sources stating that NFS2 is not as good as
>>the first and only received lukewarn scores ??
>Simple - it's a pile of crap, just like the first one. If you feel a
>desperate urge to play it I'd strongly suggest renting it.

So looking at the specifics that you site (sic) I would have to say that you
don't like games that you don't shoot stuff or beat people up or play some
lame'o sports sim.

That's fine, but until you can site specific complaints, your opinion won't
hold much credibility with people.

Jim
--
 DO NOT SEND JUNK E-MAIL:
"By US Code Title 47, Sec.227(a)(2)(B), a computer/modem/printer meets
the definition of a telephone fax machine.  By Sec.227(b)(1)(C), it is
unlawful to send any unsolicited adverti***t to such equipment.

Rob

Why is Need For Speed 2 so bad ??

by Rob » Tue, 20 May 1997 04:00:00

I own the game and i feel that it is much better than the first.


Bryan Cristin

Why is Need For Speed 2 so bad ??

by Bryan Cristin » Tue, 20 May 1997 04:00:00


> I own the game and i feel that it is much better than the first.

Yes.. it is MUCH better than the first..

Unfortunately, that isn't saying MUCH since the first one blew for PSX.

-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
"To ***: The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems."
                        * Homer J. Simpson *
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Jo

Why is Need For Speed 2 so bad ??

by Jo » Wed, 21 May 1997 04:00:00


>I own the game and i feel that it is much better than the first.

Why? They dropped half a dozen features and added nothing but crappy
tracks, crappy cars and a low frame rate.

Joe McGinn
===================================================
Author of Inside LotusScript, available August 1997
http://www.browsebooks.com/McGinn/
===================================================

Charles Doan

Why is Need For Speed 2 so bad ??

by Charles Doan » Wed, 21 May 1997 04:00:00



> >I own the game and i feel that it is much better than the first.

> Why? They dropped half a dozen features and added nothing but crappy
> tracks, crappy cars and a low frame rate.

> Joe McGinn
> ===================================================
> Author of Inside LotusScript, available August 1997
> http://www.browsebooks.com/McGinn/
> ===================================================

This is true, I'm a major NFS fan. I own NFS on 3DO, PC, and PlayStation,
and the 3DO version, even with it's slower 2d scrolling, is the
definitive version. The 3DO version was closer to a game called Road
Rash, and the 3DO credits even credit 'team Road Rash' for helping them.
NFSII was an attempt to make a great premise (an illegal 'Cannonball Run'
Rally race) into Ridge Racer. There's something tremendously cool about
blowing by a speed trap doing over 200 MPH, and hearing the clueless cop
fire up the sirens behind you. He AIN'T gonna catch you, UNLESS you mess
up. The cops are gone in NFSII, the game's single greatest mistake. The
Rally style tracks are gone too. Another mistake. I really don't consider
 NFSII to be anything more than EA using a great games' name to compete
against the Ridge Racer series. NFSII is a fairly good 3d Racer, but it
isn't as good as NFS was on the sim end, and not as good as Ridge Racer
on the arcade end.It's a jack of all trades, master of none. It's a
handyman title, imho.

--
eppur si muove... 'and yet it does move'... Galileo,
after recanting his assertion of the Earth's motion.

Brian Yeildin

Why is Need For Speed 2 so bad ??

by Brian Yeildin » Thu, 22 May 1997 04:00:00




> > >I own the game and i feel that it is much better than the first.

> > Why? They dropped half a dozen features and added nothing but crappy
> > tracks, crappy cars and a low frame rate.

> > Joe McGinn
> > ===================================================
> > Author of Inside LotusScript, available August 1997
> > http://www.browsebooks.com/McGinn/
> > ===================================================

> This is true, I'm a major NFS fan. I own NFS on 3DO, PC, and PlayStation,
> and the 3DO version, even with it's slower 2d scrolling, is the
> definitive version. The 3DO version was closer to a game called Road
> Rash, and the 3DO credits even credit 'team Road Rash' for helping them.
> NFSII was an attempt to make a great premise (an illegal 'Cannonball Run'
> Rally race) into Ridge Racer. There's something tremendously cool about
> blowing by a speed trap doing over 200 MPH, and hearing the clueless cop
> fire up the sirens behind you. He AIN'T gonna catch you, UNLESS you mess
> up. The cops are gone in NFSII, the game's single greatest mistake. The
> Rally style tracks are gone too. Another mistake. I really don't consider
>  NFSII to be anything more than EA using a great games' name to compete
> against the Ridge Racer series. NFSII is a fairly good 3d Racer, but it
> isn't as good as NFS was on the sim end, and not as good as Ridge Racer
> on the arcade end.It's a jack of all trades, master of none. It's a
> handyman title, imho.

> --
> eppur si muove... 'and yet it does move'... Galileo,
> after recanting his assertion of the Earth's motion.

I loved the ridge racer game in the arcade.  The graphics are stunning.
Has it come out for PC yet?  Are there any plans for it to?  Who makes
ridge racer?

I'm sorry to hear about NFS2.  The cars are incredible, but it seems the
game can't live up to them.  The original NFS was awesome...echoes under
bridges, great road courses, fun cars...

Jo

Why is Need For Speed 2 so bad ??

by Jo » Fri, 23 May 1997 04:00:00


I think most people here are talking about the PC version. For all we
know the Playstation version is great as you say. Maybe that's the
problem with it - they programmed it for the Psx and did a crappy port
to PC.

Joe McGinn
===================================================
Author of Inside LotusScript, available August 1997
http://www.browsebooks.com/McGinn/
===================================================

Joe Due

Why is Need For Speed 2 so bad ??

by Joe Due » Fri, 23 May 1997 04:00:00



> >I hope you weren't referring to the PlayStation version of Need For Speed
> >II when you were giving it all those bad grades. I have it for the
> >PlayStation, and it's perfect - literally. And I LOVE it!

> I think most people here are talking about the PC version. For all we
> know the Playstation version is great as you say. Maybe that's the
> problem with it - they programmed it for the Psx and did a crappy port
> to PC.

> Joe McGinn
> ===================================================
> Author of Inside LotusScript, available August 1997
> http://www.browsebooks.com/McGinn/
> ===================================================

Heh, actually, the PSX version leaves a little to be desired :)

Joe Duerr

--

Ben Kidwe

Why is Need For Speed 2 so bad ??

by Ben Kidwe » Fri, 23 May 1997 04:00:00

     I didn't think that NFS II was so bad. Then I played Rage Racer. Then
I sold my copy of NFS II to my local video rental store for $20 & counted
myself lucky.

Jo

Why is Need For Speed 2 so bad ??

by Jo » Sat, 24 May 1997 04:00:00


>One of the annoying things I found about NFS II on the Playstation was
>the fact that at some points (In the Australian Track) The Texture Maps
>didn't seem to move past at all and you looked like you weren't moving.

The PC version has the same flaw.

Joe McGinn
===================================================
Author of Inside LotusScript, available August 1997
http://www.browsebooks.com/McGinn/
===================================================

JakeHodge

Why is Need For Speed 2 so bad ??

by JakeHodge » Sun, 25 May 1997 04:00:00




> > >I hope you weren't referring to the PlayStation version of Need For Speed
> > >II when you were giving it all those bad grades. I have it for the
> > >PlayStation, and it's perfect - literally. And I LOVE it!

> > I think most people here are talking about the PC version. For all we
> > know the Playstation version is great as you say. Maybe that's the
> > problem with it - they programmed it for the Psx and did a crappy port
> > to PC.

> > Joe McGinn
> > ===================================================
> > Author of Inside LotusScript, available August 1997
> > http://www.browsebooks.com/McGinn/
> > ===================================================

> Heh, actually, the PSX version leaves a little to be desired :)

> Joe Duerr

> --


One of the annoying things I found about NFS II on the Playstation was
the fact that at some points (In the Australian Track) The Texture Maps
didn't seem to move past at all and you looked like you weren't moving.
The only 2 reasons I'm keeping it is 1. The splitscreen racing (Although
some might find it useless) and 2. My brother loves it.

JAKE (The Entity Jan, Andrew, Ken and Evan)

J.Kame

Why is Need For Speed 2 so bad ??

by J.Kame » Sun, 25 May 1997 04:00:00

At least the playstation version of NFS2 has codes for extra cars. Is
there a way to get that on the PC version?


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.