rec.autos.simulators

Car physics; technical forum open

Ruud van Ga

Car physics; technical forum open

by Ruud van Ga » Wed, 09 Jan 2002 01:36:30

Hi all,

Although RAS is a good place to discuss car physics, I wanted to let
you know that there is a technical forum up, specifically for
technical issues related to car simming, at the just-open Race Sim
Central Forums:

http://www.racesimcentral.net/

It's quiet there, as it's new, but may become a nice place of talking
about this kind of stuff.

The Racer forum is generally too much targeted at Racer alone, so this
might be a nice place. I don't really have a preference yet to using
RAS or this forum.

Just a suggestion,

Ruud van Gaal
Free car sim  : http://www.racesimcentral.net/
Pencil art    : http://www.racesimcentral.net/

Ashley McConnel

Car physics; technical forum open

by Ashley McConnel » Wed, 09 Jan 2002 01:37:54

Nice one :)

> Hi all,

> Although RAS is a good place to discuss car physics, I wanted to let
> you know that there is a technical forum up, specifically for
> technical issues related to car simming, at the just-open Race Sim
> Central Forums:

> http://forum.racesimcentral.com/forumdisplay.php?s=&forumid=77

> It's quiet there, as it's new, but may become a nice place of talking
> about this kind of stuff.

> The Racer forum is generally too much targeted at Racer alone, so this
> might be a nice place. I don't really have a preference yet to using
> RAS or this forum.

> Just a suggestion,

> Ruud van Gaal
> Free car sim  : http://www.marketgraph.nl/gallery/racer/
> Pencil art    : http://www.marketgraph.nl/gallery/

Uwe Schuerkam

Car physics; technical forum open

by Uwe Schuerkam » Wed, 09 Jan 2002 03:14:16


> Nice one :)


>> The Racer forum is generally too much targeted at Racer alone, so this
>> might be a nice place. I don't really have a preference yet to using
>> RAS or this forum.

I HATE forums, all of them. They suck. They try to re-invent
USENET just to give you banner ad overflow. Please keep the
discussion in here if possible, the volume of posts on RAS is
low enough so that a bit of hard-core physics won't / can't
hurt.

Although I am a physicist (or was, at one stage in my career),
I don't reply to technical posts, but read and follow them with
great interest.

Cheers & all the best,

Uwe

--
Uwe Schuerkamp //////////////////////////// http://www.schuerkamp.de/
Herford, Germany \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ (52.0N/8.5E)
Ever wondered what's wrong with the world?      http://bnetwork.com/
PGP Fingerprint:  2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F  67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61

Mikkel Gram-Hanse

Car physics; technical forum open

by Mikkel Gram-Hanse » Wed, 09 Jan 2002 07:13:35

Hehe Uwe I disagree on that one... Forums are IMHO a much better place for
discussions which stay open over longer periods of time. Here on RAS the
posts disappear from many peoples newsproviders in way to short time.

It is not that the *** physics is hurting anyone here.. it just gets
lost in the fray, and that is why some of the same questions about e.g. the
"pacejka constant" keep popping up here. We are trying to make a place
specifically aimed at answering that type of questions. Matematics, Physics,
Programming, and other files related in some way to simracing.

The forum also gives a much better opportunity to provide diagrams, pictures
and related files.... and it is searchable.

I know the newsgroup vs. maillist vs. forum discussion is an old one, and
that opinions differ, but please do drop by the new technical section and
join the hopefully ressourcefull group of people there.

Btw. we are working on a new hack that will make a poster in the
RaceSimCentral technical forumsection able to post to RAS as well as to the
forum if he so chooses. This means that RAS will not be robbed of the good
physical/technical/mathematical discussions... you will still be able to
read them right here. But at the same time the more "difficult" discussion
topics will have a permanent home which will hopefully in time turn into a
vault of knowledge.

Mikkel
http://www.racesimcentral.net/

Jonny Hodgso

Car physics; technical forum open

by Jonny Hodgso » Wed, 09 Jan 2002 07:10:21



> > Nice one :)


> >> The Racer forum is generally too much targeted at Racer alone, so this
> >> might be a nice place. I don't really have a preference yet to using
> >> RAS or this forum.

> I HATE forums, all of them. They suck. They try to re-invent
> USENET just to give you banner ad overflow. Please keep the
> discussion in here if possible, the volume of posts on RAS is
> low enough so that a bit of hard-core physics won't / can't
> hurt.

Seconded, though perhaps less strongly! ;-)

I fail to see the need for forums, given Usenet.  It works just
fine for me, so I certainly won't be visiting any forums soon.

Jonny

Ed Solhei

Car physics; technical forum open

by Ed Solhei » Wed, 09 Jan 2002 08:00:18

Being a webmaster of the forum in question - could you say anything else?
;-)

--
ed_


Mikkel Gram-Hanse

Car physics; technical forum open

by Mikkel Gram-Hanse » Wed, 09 Jan 2002 08:35:12


If pushed really hard I probably could.... in theory at least ;)
My preference of a forum over a newsgroup has got nothing to do with that
though !!

Mikkel

alex

Car physics; technical forum open

by alex » Wed, 09 Jan 2002 09:38:05



Probably many may not realize, but USENET and nntp servers is not
the same thing. One may host newsgroups on his server (through
nntp protocol), without being a part of the USENET. These
newsgroups won't be added to the lists and won't be propagated
by any other news servers,
however everybody will be able to point their favourite newsreader
to that server and participate in the discussions. In this
case the host of the server will decide if any articles will
expire and when.

So far I am yet to see any web based forum that can be
compared to even such poor newsreader implementations as
Microsoft outlook.
Why?
- no filtering
- no scoring
- poor thread support
- no download from the checkpoint

One also may notice that most of the companies host discussion groups
using nntp servers (for example Microsoft, Sybase, Opera) which in
no way contradicts to putting files, various guides etc on their
websites.

I wish more web/news masters would combine benefits of several
protocols (hhtp,ftp,nntp) and use them as they were intended by
their developers. They would also save server resources as well
as money paid for the bandwidth.

Alex.

Phil Le

Car physics; technical forum open

by Phil Le » Wed, 09 Jan 2002 09:49:21

We use vBulletin which supports filtering through the ignore user list and
buddy list and has thread ratings.  Not sure what you mean by poor thread
support and of course the software doesn't allow you to download the forum.
The main advantage of web based forums is the ability to upload files.

Personally I see a place for both newsgroups and forums.  I was posting here
at RAS for more than a year before I discovered Legends Central and have
posted at both since then.

Phil Lee
--
Race Sim Central Administrator
http://www.racesimcentral.com

Don Scurlo

Car physics; technical forum open

by Don Scurlo » Wed, 09 Jan 2002 09:55:35



That's a good idea, but I lean towards the anti forum crowd. Technical physics
discussions aside, I'd rather have one central place to exchange information,
whereas with forums it's fragmented all over the net. RAS is the only place I
check regularly.

--
Don Scurlock
Vancouver,B.C.

GPLRank     -15.39
MonsterRank  89.11

Come see how you rank, at the GPLRank site
http://newgplrank.schuerkamp.de/

Doug Millike

Car physics; technical forum open

by Doug Millike » Wed, 09 Jan 2002 12:11:56



> >Btw. we are working on a new hack that will make a poster in the
> >RaceSimCentral technical forumsection able to post to RAS as well as to the
> >forum if he so chooses.

> That's a good idea, but I lean towards the anti forum crowd. Technical physics
> discussions aside, I'd rather have one central place to exchange information,
> whereas with forums it's fragmented all over the net. RAS is the only place I
> check regularly.

I'm with the anti-forum crowd -- will keep reading RAS and comment on
things that are interesting, but I'm not likely to go to a forum.  One
place to exchange info is enough, imo.

I hope that interesting threads from the forum are cc'd over to RAS in some
way.  And of course it would be great if someone would collect the physics
threads on RAS and keep them somewhere nice and safe (and searchable).

-- Doug Milliken
   <http://www.millikenresearch.com>

Asbj?rn Bj?rnst

Car physics; technical forum open

by Asbj?rn Bj?rnst » Wed, 09 Jan 2002 12:33:58


> way.  And of course it would be great if someone would collect the physics
> threads on RAS and keep them somewhere nice and safe (and searchable).

http://groups.google.com/
--
  -asbjxrn
alex

Car physics; technical forum open

by alex » Wed, 09 Jan 2002 14:05:10



For example I have filter set to ignore Nascar posts
(one that contain nascar, N4 or n3 in a subject) and several
"annoying" posters. If I see thread I don't want to follow
I set to "ignore it". I give GPL posts higher score (+1000) so
I see them at the top. Of course read posts are marked and I
don't have to go through them again. Also I use "hide read threads"
options. As a result I am able
to read posts that are intersting for me just by hitting 'space'.
I can interrupt reading at any point and continue later from
the place I stopped at. I use web forum (yes, yes, your forum ;>)
because it's the best one for GPL,
but I am definitely spending more time navigating through the
web based interface than I would like to.

While RAS is non-binary group, you can accept attachment or
allow uploads on your site with the links from the posts
if you hosts news server yourself.

Alex.

Tom Pabs

Car physics; technical forum open

by Tom Pabs » Wed, 09 Jan 2002 18:18:31

"UseNet" is dead.....mostly because of the "nazi-like" prohibitionists to
HTML and graphics.  You guys created your own "end."  This is "2002"
.....not "1982."  Get a real computer and go to the Forums....you'll see
where the rest of the Internet has gone.

TP


> On Mon, 07 Jan 2002 16:37:54 +0000, Ashley McConnell

> > Nice one :)


> >> The Racer forum is generally too much targeted at Racer alone, so this
> >> might be a nice place. I don't really have a preference yet to using
> >> RAS or this forum.

> I HATE forums, all of them. They suck. They try to re-invent
> USENET just to give you banner ad overflow. Please keep the
> discussion in here if possible, the volume of posts on RAS is
> low enough so that a bit of hard-core physics won't / can't
> hurt.

> Although I am a physicist (or was, at one stage in my career),
> I don't reply to technical posts, but read and follow them with
> great interest.

> Cheers & all the best,

> Uwe

> --
> Uwe Schuerkamp //////////////////////////// http://www.schuerkamp.de/
> Herford, Germany \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ (52.0N/8.5E)
> Ever wondered what's wrong with the world?      http://bnetwork.com/
> PGP Fingerprint:  2E 13 20 22 9A 3F 63 7F  67 6F E9 B1 A8 36 A4 61

Mats Lofkvis

Car physics; technical forum open

by Mats Lofkvis » Wed, 09 Jan 2002 18:29:20


> I'm with the anti-forum crowd -- will keep reading RAS and comment on
> things that are interesting, but I'm not likely to go to a forum.  One
> place to exchange info is enough, imo.

The single place of exchange is the main reason I prefer usenet also.

As soon as you want to follow more than a few web forums, the fact that
you have to check multiple web pages is a huge disadvantage compared
to usenet browsing.

All the other disadvantages like not being able to use the client of
your own choice just makes things worse.

      _
Mats Lofkvist


rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.