>There's a very limited number of things you can change in a WC car from the
>pits during a race. It might take you all of two hours to practice and test
>them....to figure out what they do and in what way. There's literally
>dozens of "guides" on the topic of setups for you to reference, in addition
>to a very good (but not perfect) guide built into N2K2 to give the driver
>basic information about setup parameter changes. This is not hard. I think
>the term, "setup guru" is way over-used.....applied too many times to
>someone who has simply taken the time to learn and understand the basics of
>the race car setup parameters. That's an important part of the character of
>a "racing simulation".....should be part and parcel to its appeal.
to figuring out setups now than when we started(even with the guides). Should
we just be left out to dry? Since you apparently understand all the
ramifications of setup subtleties, you can't see the point of view from those
that don't. Just like the fast drivers can't understand what it's like at the
back of the grid. It's an elitist view...
Should we not be able to download others' setups, as well? First, it's
possible to find someone's setups that work for you without knowing why.
Second, I know of some VERY good sim drivers who don't have a CLUE about
setups. They find one that works for them and kick everyone else's ass...
Third, I don't think that REAL drivers know how to tweak the car for maximum
benefit(um, that's why they have a crew chief). If *they* can't, why should
*we* be expected to?
The better drivers usually win anyway, so what's wrong with giving people who
aren't good at setups a CHANCE?
Eldred
--
Homepage - http://www.racesimcentral.net/~epickett
GPLRank - under construction...
Can the Detroit Tigers match the Detroit Lions' blazing 2001 start of 0-12???
Currently at 0-8...stay tuned...
Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.