Yes, I am amazed by these events, Michael.
As a spectator, I've stood next to racing tracks close enough to reach out
and touch a car as it has passed (relatively slowly....I always liked to
spectate at the slower corners).
No way in the world would I ever do that as part of a crowd lining a gravel
road on which rally cars are arriving sideways in an enormous cloud of dust.
--
Regards,
Bruce Kennewell,
Canberra, Australia.
---------------------------
> Bruce,
> Agreed. From our current "lofty position" I always shake my head in
> amazement when watching a contemporary rally race. Just this weekend I
> caught some of Speedvision's coverage of rallies from Portugal and
> Spain. Thousands of spectators lining loose-dirt roads with cars
> whizzing past kicking dirt into the spectators' faces.... It amazes me
> that they can still run the races like that.
> Michael Lowery
> > Well...that's how we went motor-racing then. It's all very easy to use
30+
> > year's of collective wisdom but the sport was far more dangerous then
for
> > both driver AND spectator.
> > But we didn't question it because it was .....well, it just WAS.
> > If somebody had invented chain link fencing and Armco barriers in 1954
that
> > terrible accident at le Mans in '55 may not have happened. But it did,
> > because it was 1955, not 1995.
> > When criticising past behaviour...and technology...one has to remember
that
> > one is doing so from a lofty position that allows the benefit of looking
> > backwards into history.
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Bruce Kennewell,
> > Canberra, Australia.
> > ---------------------------
> > > > That's why motor-racing for a spectator back then was *far* more
> > exciting
> > > > than now.
> > > Kinda gives a whole new definition to the term "keep your eyes on the
> > > action", eh Bruce? <g>
> > > --
> > > Chuck Kandler
> > > A man is no less a Slave just because he is
> > > allowed to choose a new Master every four years.